Not in Revision Powerpoint Flashcards

(65 cards)

1
Q

Epidemiology

A

Study of disease and their treatments from a population perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Epistemology

A

different ways to find out about reality eg. quantitative questionnaire to test knowledge pre + post lecture. Qual: Observe and ask people their point of view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Epistemology social construction

A

people construct their knowledge together eg. ideal community build ideas together and learn from one another ‘oh yes I also read that paper and thought…’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mental capacity

A

also referred to as capacity. The ability to retain and understand information needed to make a decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Non-experimental

A

research which does not use comparison to test cause and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ontology

A

objective (facts/ not influenced/ impartial/ unbias) vs subjective (personal/ opinions/ bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Peer review

A

a common practice in good quality journals whereby submitted articles are reviewed by subject experts for their accuracy. Peer review is usually undertaken without the identity of researcher being disclosed to the reviewers, to avoid bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prospective vs retrospective

A

Prospective: going forward in time.
Retrospective: going back in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Representative

A

the amount of similarity between a study sample and the population from which it is drawn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quan:
Sensitivity vs Specificity

A

Sensitivity: the ability of a test to correctly identify patients with a disease
Specificity: the ability of a test to correctly identify people without the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of evidence
Systematic review

A

a review of literature on a given topic which is undertaken using a defined process covering a predetermined number of years of the literature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Qual: Tacit knowledge

A

knowledge so deeply embedded, they often forget they have it. It is known to people within a group and does not need explanation within the context of that group, but may be unknown to outsiders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Qual: Bracketing

A

researchers opinion put to the side- self-awareness to not impact study results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Qual Terminolgy
Contextual

A

Individual perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Critical appraisal

A

Are the findings credible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Qual: Emic vs eTic

A

Emic: Seeing something from an insiders point of view eg. student nurses point of view of their course
Etic: outsiders point of view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Qual: Empirical

A

Something proved/ discovered by experience
-lots of student nurses drop out

Grounded theory would be why do they drop out ^^

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Qual: Ethnography/ethnographic study

A

how people behave in a certain context or culture (eg. ward vs community nursing ). Getting immersed into a community to get a better perspective than being a stranger in a room eg. being a student nurse at ACE for 3 months vs head lead teacher popping in for 20 mins you will have a better portrayal of the participants reality. Glasgow HIV paper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Qual: Gatekeeper

A

helps gain access to a group to be studied eg. ward manager agreeing for nurses to be involved with the study and help select who is going to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Qual: Hawthorne effect

A

Bias – people respond in a manner in which they believe they should because researcher present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Qual: InDuctive

A

develop a theory from data eg. for the last 5 summers I have seen fireflies in my garden so this summer I will see fireflies in my garden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Qual: Interpretive phenomenology

A

Interpreting and understanding human experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Qual: Iterative process

A

initiative
data analysis starts before data collection has finished because data saturation is reached eg. all 5 student nurses thought that they don’t get enough support. Common theme so most student nurses think they don’t get enough support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Qual: Narrative inquiry

A

stories are collected, analysed and presented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Qual: Narrative analysis
why do people tell the story that way? What was emphasised? Where was eye contact present and not present ? etc.
26
Qual: Paradigm
the philosophical position that is taken within the research.
27
Qual: Purposive
sampling method where people are chosen for inclusion because they meet the purpose of the research. This means they have experience of the phenomenon being studied. - long term diabetes vs diagnosed yesterday
28
Qualitative
Opinions, quality of interaction and how it felt to experience something eg. how did the new blood pressure drug feel
29
Qual: Reflexivity
made clear that the researcher is aware of how they influence data collection eg. lecturer marking your assignment asking your opinion on how they lead the model vs a non-connected person asking you for feedback on the module.
30
Qual: Relevance
this refers to the extent to which the findings of a study might be applied outside the context of the original research
31
Qual: Retrospective
looking back in time
32
Qual: Rich data
small sample size but high detail used in qualitative research eg. long term diabetes patient vs diagnosed yesterday diabetes patient
33
Qual: Rigour
trustworthiness- was the study well conducted? What limitations are involved?
34
Qual: Semi-structured interview
an interview that is partially guided using something like a topic guide or a list of predetermined questions.
35
Qual: Theoretical sampling
a method of sampling that occurs as researchers build new theories and idea from the data they have collected and test these theories by interviewing more subjects to see if the new theories still hold true. Usually a feature of grounded theory research. Also called handy sampling.
36
Qual: Triangulation
more than one method or source of data used to study a social event eg. questionnaire, interview AND survey for healthcare staff AND patients
37
Quan Sampling Blinding
Placebo use in RCT. Primary- only patient. Secondary- patient and medical administrator. Tertiary- patient, administrator and data analyse
38
Terminology Causality
the relationship between cause and effect
39
Experimental Confounding variable
an extra variable you don’t account for that impacts the independent and dependent variable. – a control variable that isn’t controlled! Eg. People who eat more ice cream get more sunburnt. Temp would be the confounding variable.
40
Experimental Control arm
The group that isn’t changed to compare if the results have an impact
41
Experimental Correlation
Two variables are related
42
Experimental deDUCtivE
QUAN prove an Existing theory or hypothesis using scientific data Collection and accepting/ rejecting a nUll hypothesis
43
Experimental Dependant variable
what you measure
44
Experimental Equivalence study
New treatment vs current treatment (rather than placebo)
45
Experimental
a way of testing a hypothesis through comparison- case and control
46
Experimental Hypothesis
Suggesting that an effect will happen. In paper written as H1 eg. does talking aspirin everyday reduce the chance of having a heart attack
47
Experimental Null hypothesis
suggesting nothing (no effect) will happen. In paper written at H0 eg. taking aspirin everyday has no effect on reducing a heart attack
48
Experimental Independent variable
what you change
49
Interventional study/ clinical trial
tests an intervention eg. new drug using a clinical trial
50
Terminology Odds ratio
the result of something happening. It is 2.5 x more likely that …
51
Terminology Parametric
Normal disruption. More assumptions. Larger sample size. No outliers. Equal variances. Interval or ratio
52
Terminology Non-parametric
non-normal distributed data. Less assumptions. Small sample size. Outliers. Unequal variances. Nominal (named or labelled) or ordinal (specific order and named)
53
Terminology for epidemiology - PrevAlencE
the amount of cases of diseases in a given population over a specific time.
54
Quantitative
Quantity/ measure/ generalise/ stats eg. the new drug lowered blood pressure by this amount
55
Statistics standard deviation
the dispersion of data around the mean
56
Statistics Statically significant
P < 0.05. 5% probability that something happened by chance so sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and accept the (alternative) hypothesis
57
Statistics non-statically significant
P > 0.05. over 5% probability that something happened by chance so accept null hypothesis and reject the (alternative) hypothesis because there isn’t enough sufficient evidence to support alternative hypothesis
58
Statistics clinically significant vs statistically significance
Clinical – the healthcare and patients decide if the intervention has an effect Statically- clinical research with numbers and p-value state if an intervention has an effect
59
Quan Sampling Convenience sample
Selection of the most readily available people as participants
60
Quan Sampling Cross-sectional study
taken at a single point in time (most common survey type)
61
Statistics Meta-analysis
the process of collating the statistics from a number of studies and re-analysing it as one dataset.
62
Experimental Trail arm
no. of groups involved with an experiment/ trial
63
per-protocol anaylsis
Only considers participants that have always adhered to ALL the study protocol – always receive the intervention and showed up for check ups D: overestimates treatment effects. distortion of true study results if the only form on analysis
64
As treated anaylsis
Analysis based on actual treatment received regardless of the original group assignment. Receive additional therapy other than that assigned by randomization
65
Completers only anaylsis
Only people who complete study are analysed