PA 8 & 9 Action Flashcards

1
Q

Perception-action mapping

A

We can seamlessly map visual representations
of actions onto our motor systems (crossmodal
transfer) to produce a copy of the action

= innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

developmental evidence for innate PAM

A

infants imitate facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Active Intermodal Matching
(AIM)

A
  • Neonates recognise
    equivalences between body
    transformations they see and
    those of their own body that
    they ‘feel’ themselves make

AIM involves:
* perception and action having independent
coding/representation
* A “specialist” module for imitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AIM vs other theories

A

AIM involves:
* perception and action having independent
coding/representation
* A “specialist” module for imitation

Other theories (IM and ASL) posit:
* Common coding for perception and action
* Imitation part of “generalist” processes for
motor control and learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dual route model of imitation

A

input action

visual analysis

  • Semantic –
    meaningful actions,
    stored in repetoire
  • Visuomotor/direct –
    meaningless actions –
    mirror neurones

output action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mirror neurones

A

Same neurones
found to be
active when the
monkey
performed and
watched an
action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MNs - General properties

A

Bimodal, visuo-motor
neurons (i.e., respond
to both visual and
motor stimuli)
* Discharge when
individual performs an
action and when they
observe the same
action performed by
another individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

F5 contains 3-types of neurons (direct
evidence from monkeys):

A

– ‘action observation-related’ visuomotor
neurons (mirror neurons)
– motor neurons
– Canonical visuomotor neurons (also
called ‘object observation-related’
neurons)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

indirect evidence for human mirror neurons

A
  • close link between perception and action
  • behavioural
  • brain imaging
  • TMS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

direct evidence in humans for mirror neurons

A

Recording from neurons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

behavioural evidence for MNs

A

faster response when there is compatibility between observed and executed movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Human MNs – Brain Imaging
evidence

A

Somatotopic activation of premotor and parietal cortex
(Buccino et al, 2001)

areas correspond to
observations of actions of
different body parts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Perception action overlap human MN evidence

A

Overlap in brain
activity between
imagined, observed
and executed
movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Human MNs - TMS EVIDENCE

A

Use motor evoked potentials to show that observing an
action produces increased motor excitability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Human MNs – Direct recording

A
  • Recorded from 1177 neurons in 21 patients
    undergoing surgery for intractable epilepsy
  • They observed and executed grasping actions
    and facial gestures
  • Action observation-related (‘mirror’) neurons
    found in medial frontal lobe (supplementary
    motor area; SMA) and medial temporal lobe
    (hippocampus)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

diff response in mirror neurons in mirror neurones

A

when observing action, some will respond with excitation, some with inhibition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Species-specific differences

human vs monkey

A

for human, action does not have to be goal-directed or contain object.
- meaningless movements are represented
* Action must be goal-directed (often involve actual
object)
* Cannot learn novel and complex acts (involve BA46
not present in monkey) – THEY DON’T IMITATE
* Rather than for imitation MNs may underpin
understanding intentions

18
Q

what does the core imitation circuit contain

WHAT FUNCTION

A

STS, MNS
superior temporal sulcus

mirror neuron system

gesture and language

19
Q

motor preparation areas

WHAT MAIN AREA

WHAT FUNCTION

A

BA46 …

imitative learning

20
Q

how do insula and limbic system interact with core imitation circuit

A

to perform social mirroring

21
Q

MNs and origin of language

A

MNs give capacity to recognise actions of others

  • inter-individual communication
  • manual gesture system
  • vocal speech
22
Q

Inter-individual communication

A

Actor performs an
action
Observer is interested
and produces small
motor response
visible to actor
Actor recognises
intention of observer
and responds
Observer recognises
they have affected
behaviour of actor

23
Q

From Gesture to Speech.

suggested evidence that hand gestures predisposed speech

A

The hand and mouth are functionally linked
(Gentilucci et al., 2001; Darwin)
* When hold large/small objects people make
matching large and small mouth movements
* Make larger mouth movements (and louder
sounds) when asked to produce a syllable whilst
holding large objects
* Size of mouth movement increased when
watching someone else hold a large object

24
Q

intersubjectivity

A

intersubjectivity is about how we share experiences, emotions, and understandings with other people. It’s the foundation for social connection — how “my mind” and “your mind” can meet.

  • Imitation, empathy, intention

Gallese suggests that when we observe other people, we understand them by simulating their actions and feelings inside our own body and mind. = embodied simulation

Together, crossmodal transfer (put diff senses together) + mirror neurons allow us to internally mirror others’ experiences — forming the basis of imitation, empathy, and predicting intentions.

25
evidence for motor empathy
p.p press space bar. watch needle touch hand or control cotton bud touch hand measure RT of pressing or releasing space bar found were quicker to release space bar when needle. BUT opposite true for control
26
When you see a disgust expression: brain regions
Your brain internally copies the face (BA44), feels the disgust inside your body (insula), and emotionally reacts to it (amygdala).
27
Chameleon Effect
Empathy boosts unconscious mimicry Higher mimicry = better social connections.
28
3 major theories of autism
- ToM deficit (mentalizing) - Weak central coherence (focus on detail at expense of bigger picture) - Broken mirror theory
29
Broken Mirror Theory
Problem with MNs could explain:Problems with imitation * Difficulties with empathy/social cognition * Difficulties with metaphor and indirect meaning
30
Examined similarities between observing and executing actions * Compared similar action for eating and placing * Compared autistic and non-autistic children FOUND what
Increased activity (mouth open) for eating versus placing for both execution and observation Increased activity only for execution in autistic group
31
limitations with primate data
- small no. of examples - often qualitative - how well can cells distinguish types of movement? - need evidence of MNS firing in spontaneous social interaction
32
limitations of human data MNs
many areas outside of MN reas activated during action observation - are the same (individual) mirror neurones firing? adaptation protocols
33
adaptation tasks (in MN)
(similar to line orientation or colour adaptation). Mirror neuron will fire less when adapted to same gesture. if see scissors then see scissors again, then the neuron will still be adapted. if see scissors and then act scissors, the adaptation effect will not show
34
Hickok’s argument
Observing an action may activate this system with similar electrophysiological consequences, not because it is reading the intention of the actor, but simply because the sensory event is is associated with particular motor acts In simpler terms: ➡️ You see an action → your brain remembers what it feels like to do that action → your motor system fires. ➡️ It’s habitual sensory-motor matching, not necessarily interpreting someone's goals.
35
Action understanding can be achieved without MNs
* F5 also responds to objects, but it is not argued to underpin understanding of objects * Another region, such as Superior Temporal Sulcus (STS) may be more critical for action understanding
36
Human-monkey differences
Higher cognitive functions attributed to MNs are not seen in monkeys * Assumed that MN in humans has developed to include both action understanding and imitation * Cannot assume that conclusions from monkey MNs apply in humans e.g. few human imaging studies examine overlap between observation and own action
37
Calvo-Merino (2005) Ballet dancers v. Capoeira Greater activation for experts in ehich areas
1 ventral pre-motor 2 dorsal pre-motor 3 Inferior parietal sulcus 4 Posterior STS
38
Problems with the broken mirror theory of autism
Effects may be due to activity outside of MN areas * MN problems cannot explain preference for local detail and sensory problems Autistic adults/children can * Recognise and predict actions * Imitate under some conditions
39
Conclusion More understanding is needed about MNs More evidence needed for:
specificity of MNs and their existence in humans - key role of MNs in action understanding and social cognition - broken mirror theory of autism is over-simplistic
40