PA wk 7- motion perception. - ESSAY LEC Flashcards
(23 cards)
Motion after-effect
When viewing a stationary object ‘up’ and ‘down’ detectors fire equally
Prolonged viewing of downward motion causes reduced firing of ‘down’ detectors (adaptation)
Viewing a stationary object post-adaptation results in greater ‘up’ activation than ‘down’, hence we perceive upward motion.
Local Motion
Motion of individual (local) elements
Global motion
We can group the motion of many individual elements to perceive a complex pattern of global motion
motion coherene threshold
minimum proportion of signal dots (dots moving in same direction) compared to noise dots (random direction) to detect coherent motion.
For humans this is 10% (5% if trained)
what do these global motion tests suggest ab our motion detectors
we have:
Local motion detectors: mall receptive field
and
Global motion detectors: large receptive field
how brain processes motion.
MT (middle temporal) or V5 specialised in processing motion
single cell recording evidence for MT/V5 area in processing motion
found nearly all cells have a preferred direction and respond to motion
Artificial stimulation research as evidence for MT/V5 area in processing motion
when stimulated area of downward motion cells in monkeys when presenting random movement, monkeys reported downwards motion
Tootell et al (1995): fMRI study of the motion after-effect
When we adapt to motion, then view stationary test, we experience motion in the opposite direction
2 conditions. 1 showed only expanding. 2 showed expanding + contacting (which resulted in no after effect)
Results:
When no after effect, the activity in MT took less time to reduce compared to when there was an after effect.
MT remains active during period of after-effect (i.e. no direct stimulation, but motion still perceived)
lesion study of MT
Newsome and Paré (1988) introduced small lesion to monkey MT
Undamaged coherence thresholds = 5%
Damaged coherence threshold = 80%
(big threshold is bad)
Optic flow
what motions create which retinal movements
pattern of retinal motion produced when we move
e.g. moving forwards, everything expands
backwards, everything contracts##
Rotation = horizontal motion
lateral movement = horizontal movement (but with motion paralax
Roll = created by eye, head, or body roll.
optic flow
complex movements
e.g. forward translation and head rotation combined
Imaging Optic Flow
(MST predicted to be important)
Measure response of MT and MST to 5 types of motion:
Complex
Expansion
Rotation (Roll)
Translation
Random
Interested in the difference in response to optic flow compared to random motion
The difference in response to optic flow compared to random motion is greater in MST than MT
Suggests MST is more specialised for processing optic flow motion than MT
(i.e the difference removes the activity explained by random motion)
what is optic flow used for
- navigation in world
- postural stability
- perceiving object motion during self motion
Gibson proposed we use optic flow to tell us
where we are heading and to control locomotion
Optic flow might not be the only information used for heading
e.g.
Driving – Land & Lee (1994) showed we don’t look at FOE when driving, we look at other parts of the scene e.g. When on a curved path we look at the tangent
how is optic flow used for postural stability
evidence fir this
provides info on how posture is changing
they slid walls of a room to appear as if you were leaning forwards .
Found that todlers fell over
Perception of object motion during self-motion
how is this calculated
what is this called
Flow-parsing hypothesis:
Optic flow due to self movement subtracted from total optic flow.
This gives optic flow due to object movement
Biological Motion
= the motion of another person’s body creates a complex pattern of movement
Local motion signals need to be integrated to recover the global pattern of motion
* We appear to be particularly adept at perceiving biological motion
what do fMRI studies show about biological motion processing
Area STS (superior temporal sulcus) more active for biological motion compared to scrambled
Grossman et al (2005) TMS experiment
Applied TMS to STS and MT
Task –is the stimulus biological
motion or scrambled?
Found:
TMS to STS caused significant decrease in ability to distinguish biological motion from scrambled
TMS to MT had no effect on biological motion perception