paper 1 - memory Flashcards
Describe The Sensory Register:
- Stimulus from the environment passes into the sensory register
. Coding - Modality specific
. Duration - 0.5 seconds
. Capacity - High
Describe The Short Term Memory:
- Information passes through the sensory register to the STM through paying attention
. Coding - Acoustically
. Duration - 18-30 seconds (unless rehearsed)
. Capacity - 5-9 items
Describe The Long Term Memory:
- If maintenance rehearsal occur (repeating the info to ourselves) it can increase the length of time information is held in the STM. If info is rehearsed enough it will be passed into the LTM.
. Coding - Semantically
. Duration - Potentially up to a lifetime
. Capacity - Potentially unlimited
How to recall information:
The information must be transferred from the LTM to STM, through retrieval
Strength: The Multi Store Model
The multi store model of memory is supported by research that show that STM and LTM are different stores. E.g. research found (Baddeley) that ppts mixed up words that sound similar in the STM, but mixed up words that have similar meanings in the LTM. This study clearly shows that coding in STM is acoustic and coding in the LTM is semantic. This supports the multi store model of memory because it supports the view that the STM and LTM are separate.
Strength: The Multi Store Model
Further research to support Atkinson and Shiffrin’s multi store model of memory comes from a case study of Clive Wearing. He suffers from amnesia in which he cannot transfer information from his STM to his LTM, this is evident as when his wife re-enters the room after leaving just seconds before, he greets her as if it is the first time he has seen her in years. This supports the multi store model of memory because it shows that STM and LTM are separate stores and that information must flow through in a linear way, first to STM then LTM.
Weakness: The Multi Store Model
However, critics would argue that the case study to support the Multi store model is flawed, as it has low population validity.The research was a case study of just one person, Clive Wearing, who has an unusual illness involving damage to the brain. Therefore, it is difficult to generalise the findings to the wider population as their memory may operate differently, thus limiting the support that the research provides for the multi store model of memory.
Weakness: The Multi Store Model
Moreover, it suggests that the MSM could be too simplistic in the stating that STM and LTM are unitary stores. For example. Other researchers conducted research into the STM on patient, who suffered from amnesia, found that recall in STM for digits was very poor when the digits were read aloud, but recall was much better when you could read the digits to urself. This suggests that there must be different stores within the STM, one to process visual and one to process auditory info, casting doubt on the theories assumption that the STM is unitary.
STUDY: Coding for the sensory register
Sperling:
Modality specific (different coding for different stores)
Procedure: Ppts shown a grid of 12 symbols and displayed for 0.5 seconds. High tone was played and they had to recall the first line. Medium tone was played and they had to recall middle line. Low tone was played and they had to recall the last line
STUDY: Capacity for the sensory register
Sperling:
Potentially unlimited
findings: if the capacity was 3/4 symbols on the line suggets retained information is 76%, meaning sensory has a potentially unlimited capacity
STUDY: Duration for the sensory register
Sperling:
Iconic (visual) memories last less than 1 second
Findings: If a delay occured information was forgotten. After 0.3 seconds 50% of info was recalled. After 1 second accuracy reduced to 33%. Suggesting duration is less than 1 second
STUDY: Coding for the STM
Baddeley:
STM codes acoustically as there was better call with acoustically dissimilar words
Procedure: Showed list of words in 4 categories
- Acoustically similair
- Acoustically dissimilar
- Semantically similar
- Semantically dissimilar
immediately after each they had to recall in the CORRECT ORDER
Finding: More mistakes on Acoustically similar (STM codes acoustically)
STUDY: Capacity for the STM
Miller:
Limited 5-9 items were recalled using the digit-span technique
Procedure: digit span technique
- ppts given unrelated digits that incresed by 1 digit each time. Span was measured until they could no longer recall the digits in the correct sequence.
Findings: ppts able to recall 5-9 items (capacity of STM is 5-9 items)
STUDY: Duration for the STM
Peterson & Peterson:
18-30 seconds, however maintenance rehearsal will increase duration
Procedure: ppts breifly presented with trigram then given a 3 digit number and asked to count backwards from this number (prevent rehearsal). Stopped at different intervals and asked to recall trigram
Findings: After 3 seconds 80%. After 18 seconds 10% recalled correctly
STUDY: Coding for the LTM
Baddeley:
LTM codes semantically, as here was better recall with semantically dissimilar words after 20-minute prevention task
Procedure: showed ppts lists of words in 4 categories
- semantically similiar
- semantically dissimilar
- acoustically similiar
- acoustically dissimilar
After ppts had to recall in the CORRECT ORDER
Findings: Mistakes made on semantically similar (LTM codes semantically)
STUDY: Capacity for the LTM
Standing:
Unlimited 90% recognition of photos after a few days
Procedure: over a week showed ppts 10,000 photos for a few seconds each
Findings: when tested a few days later 90% recall (LTM is unlimited capacity)
STUDY: Duration for the LTM
Bahrick:
Potentially a lifetime. Recall of classmates remained accurate after 47 years, improved with the use of correct cues (photos)
Procedure: tested 392 American graduates on their memor of former classmates.
conditon 1: recall names of classmates using yearbook
Condition 2: recall names without photo cue
Findings: conditon 1 - 70% accurate recall after 48 years
conditon 2 - 30% accurate recall after 48 years
(Potentially last a life time)
Weakness: Studies into Sensory register + STM + LTM
The research into coding of LTM conducted by Baddeley lacks mundane realism, as the task of recalling semantically similar or acoustically similar words is artificial. Therefore, it is difficult to generalise the findings as there was higher recall for the acoustically similar words as this research does not reflect most real-life memory therefore, lowering the external validity of the research into the coding of LTM.
Strength: Studies into Sensory register + STM + LTM
The research into the capacity of STM conducted by Miller has high control over extraneous variables as it was carried out in a controlled setting (lab), for example ppts were given strings of unrelated digits that increased by 1 digit each time. This means that we are more likely to establish a cause and effect between the IV list of words and the DV how accurate the recall of words where. Therefore, increasing the internal validity of the research into the capacity of the STM.
Strength: Studies into Sensory register + STM + LTM
Research into the duration of STM conducted by Peterson & Peterson is high in reliability this is because the research was carried out in a controlled environment (lab) therefore the research could be repeated in the same conditions. For example, ppts were presented with a trigram and given a three-digit number and had to count back in 3s then asked to recall the trigram. In order to check for consistent results into the duration of the STM.
Strength: Studies into Sensory register + STM + LTM (Bahrick evaluation)
Bahrick’s research into duration of the LTM is high in mundane realism, as the research assessed real life memories of the individual’s old classmates. This is a strength because it is something you might find yourself doing in everyday life, for example, searching for an old friend on social media. Therefore, it may be easier to generalise the research findings of the duration of LTM to other real-life applications, increasing the external validity of the research into the duration of LTM
Types of LTM: Procedural memory
“Knowing how”
. Responsible for knowing how to do things E.g. motor skills (riding a bike)
. Do not involve conscious thoughts and are non-declarative
. Area of the brain that is responsible is the Cerebellum + Motor cortex
Types of LTM: Semantic memory
“Knowing that”
. Responsible for storing knowledge about the world (own encyclopedia) E.g. facts Paris is the capital of France
. Involves conscious thoughts and are declarative
. Area of the brain that is responsible is the Temporal Lobe
Types of LTM: Episodic memory
. Responsible for storing information about events E.g. first day of school
. Involve conscious thoughts and are declarative as well as timestamped
. Area of the brain that is responsible is the Hippocampus