Paul Heselton 18 Theories OfCLD Flashcards
(26 cards)
Behaviourism
- B.F. Skinner
- the theory that all learning happens through operant conditioning
- a child can be trained to repeat certain actions or utterances if they get a favourable response (positive reinforcement)
- a lack of any positive response will discourage repetition of the action/utterance (negative reinforcement)
- everyone is born with a ‘blank slate’ and children learn to speak through imitation
Evaluating behaviourism
- look in the data for examples of children copying older peoples lexis, grammar and phonology
- limitations:
Children rarely simply repeat what adults say
Children often make virtuous errors, logical but non-standard utterances which suggest they are creatively working out grammatical rules not just copying
Children appear to go through the same predicatible stages of development regardless of input
Few children receive explicitly grammatical correction
Nelson- parents more interested in politeness and truth value
Nativism
- Chomsky and pinker
- argued the human brain has a naturally programmed ability to learn language and ability to work out language systems
- coined the term LAD (goes against blank slate)
- universal grammar = used to describe this global capacity to learn languages at similar rates
Limitations of nativism
- Isaac Slabin argued a child is not born with a set of linguistic categories but instead some form of process mechanism
- chomskys work was theoretical not based on linguistic data
- chomskys theory downplays the part played by interaction + functions behind children’s language
- Bard and Sachs 1977 Jim case study
Cognitivism
- jean Piaget (1936)
- suggest that children would not develop until particular stages of cognitive development had been reached
- sensorimotor (0-2), pre-operational (2-6/7), concrete operational (6/6-11/12) formal operational (11-16+)
- focused on the need from conceptual understanding to be present before language can reflect it
Evaluating cognitivism
- it’s possible to link a child’s language to their conceptual development in the early stages (e.g. the child’s realisation of ‘object permanence’ at the end of stage 1 which enables the child to articulate abstract ideas about non-deictical concepts)
- as the child gets older t becomes harder to make clear links between cognitive level and language
- some studies have focused on children who have learnt to speak fluently despite having a relatively low cognitive level - some studies have called ‘cocktail party chatterers’ (jean aitchison)
Social interactionism
- Bruner
- focused on the importance of a child’s interaction with caregivers as the key to language development
- LASS
- scaffolding (vygotsky)
- concentrated more on the need for quality input from caregivers to facilitate learning rather than on imitation and positive/negative reinforcement
Evaluating social interactionism
- look out for data for evidence which supports and challenges the idea that the caregivers language is enabling progression in the child’s language
- CDS: repetition of key lexis, simplification of sentence constructions, over-articulation of certain phonemes
- children of all backgrounds and language tend to progress through similar stages predictably
- some cultures e.g. in papa New Guinea don’t appear to use CDS. At all to young children yet they develop language at the same rate
Pre-verbal stage
Crying, cooing, babbling - reduplicated and variegated
Holophtastic stage
One word utterances
Two-word stage
Word order starts to follow conventional English syntactical patterns
Roger browns eight categories of 2-word utterances incl:
- agent + action
- action + location
- possessor + possession
Telegraphic stage
Omission of grammatical lexis
Halliday (1975!!!!!)
- suggested that having an intended outcome or motivation for using language, a child will then be motivated to further use language
- instrumental, regulatory, interactional, personal, heuristic, imaginative, representational
John Dores (1978) speech acts
Labelling, repeating, answering, requesting action, calling, greeting, protesting practising
Critical period hypothesis
Eric lenneberg
- believed that in the first few years if life, sufficient social interaction and exposure to language was essential that a child might gain full master of the language
- case of genie often used, discovered in 1970
The WUG test
- jean Berko Gleason, 1958
- wanted to test the notion that children have a more sophisticated understanding of linguistic morphology than they have been taught explicitly
- pseudo words like wug
76% of 4-5-year-olds able to use -s inflection - results suggest that children have an ability to understand grammatical rules and transfer them to other examples they’ve never heard before
The ‘fis’ phenomenon
- berko and brown, 1960
- researched the extent to which children can hear the correct pronunciation of words but are unable to always articulate phoenemes accurately themselves - could be through physical limitations or the inability to recognise the errors that are occurring
- showed a child rejecting an adults articulation of the noun ‘fish’ as ‘fis’
- goes against skinners behaviourist theory and that sometimes they can’t simply imitate language
IRF structure
- Sinclair and couthlard
- initiation, response, feedback
- demonstrated that questioning and evaluating are important aspects to CDS
Early lexis - Katherine Nelson
- found that 60% of first words were nouns
- verbs formed second largest group
- modifiers theirs
- personal/social words only 8%
Eve Clark
Over extension + under extension
Rescorla
Categorically vs. Analogical overextension
Jean aitchison
Three stages in children’s lexical development:
- labelling
- packaging
- network building
Roger brown 1973
Suggested that children learn to use inflections in a predictable order:
1. Present participle (running)
2. Plural -s
3. Possessive -s
4. Articles
5. Past tense
6. Third person singular -s
7. Auxiliary verb
Bellugi - pronoun development
Discovered that children developed their use of pronouns in predictable stages:
1. Gives a name rather than a pronoun
2. Will start to use subject and object pronouns but no accurate consistent application
3. Correctly apply subject and object pronouns