Paul Heselton 18 Theories OfCLD Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

Behaviourism

A
  • B.F. Skinner
  • the theory that all learning happens through operant conditioning
  • a child can be trained to repeat certain actions or utterances if they get a favourable response (positive reinforcement)
  • a lack of any positive response will discourage repetition of the action/utterance (negative reinforcement)
  • everyone is born with a ‘blank slate’ and children learn to speak through imitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evaluating behaviourism

A
  • look in the data for examples of children copying older peoples lexis, grammar and phonology
  • limitations:
    Children rarely simply repeat what adults say
    Children often make virtuous errors, logical but non-standard utterances which suggest they are creatively working out grammatical rules not just copying
    Children appear to go through the same predicatible stages of development regardless of input
    Few children receive explicitly grammatical correction
    Nelson- parents more interested in politeness and truth value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nativism

A
  • Chomsky and pinker
  • argued the human brain has a naturally programmed ability to learn language and ability to work out language systems
  • coined the term LAD (goes against blank slate)
  • universal grammar = used to describe this global capacity to learn languages at similar rates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Limitations of nativism

A
  • Isaac Slabin argued a child is not born with a set of linguistic categories but instead some form of process mechanism
  • chomskys work was theoretical not based on linguistic data
  • chomskys theory downplays the part played by interaction + functions behind children’s language
  • Bard and Sachs 1977 Jim case study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cognitivism

A
  • jean Piaget (1936)
  • suggest that children would not develop until particular stages of cognitive development had been reached
  • sensorimotor (0-2), pre-operational (2-6/7), concrete operational (6/6-11/12) formal operational (11-16+)
  • focused on the need from conceptual understanding to be present before language can reflect it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluating cognitivism

A
  • it’s possible to link a child’s language to their conceptual development in the early stages (e.g. the child’s realisation of ‘object permanence’ at the end of stage 1 which enables the child to articulate abstract ideas about non-deictical concepts)
  • as the child gets older t becomes harder to make clear links between cognitive level and language
  • some studies have focused on children who have learnt to speak fluently despite having a relatively low cognitive level - some studies have called ‘cocktail party chatterers’ (jean aitchison)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Social interactionism

A
  • Bruner
  • focused on the importance of a child’s interaction with caregivers as the key to language development
  • LASS
  • scaffolding (vygotsky)
  • concentrated more on the need for quality input from caregivers to facilitate learning rather than on imitation and positive/negative reinforcement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluating social interactionism

A
  • look out for data for evidence which supports and challenges the idea that the caregivers language is enabling progression in the child’s language
  • CDS: repetition of key lexis, simplification of sentence constructions, over-articulation of certain phonemes
  • children of all backgrounds and language tend to progress through similar stages predictably
  • some cultures e.g. in papa New Guinea don’t appear to use CDS. At all to young children yet they develop language at the same rate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pre-verbal stage

A

Crying, cooing, babbling - reduplicated and variegated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Holophtastic stage

A

One word utterances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Two-word stage

A

Word order starts to follow conventional English syntactical patterns
Roger browns eight categories of 2-word utterances incl:
- agent + action
- action + location
- possessor + possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Telegraphic stage

A

Omission of grammatical lexis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Halliday (1975!!!!!)

A
  • suggested that having an intended outcome or motivation for using language, a child will then be motivated to further use language
  • instrumental, regulatory, interactional, personal, heuristic, imaginative, representational
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

John Dores (1978) speech acts

A

Labelling, repeating, answering, requesting action, calling, greeting, protesting practising

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Critical period hypothesis

A

Eric lenneberg
- believed that in the first few years if life, sufficient social interaction and exposure to language was essential that a child might gain full master of the language
- case of genie often used, discovered in 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The WUG test

A
  • jean Berko Gleason, 1958
  • wanted to test the notion that children have a more sophisticated understanding of linguistic morphology than they have been taught explicitly
  • pseudo words like wug
    76% of 4-5-year-olds able to use -s inflection
  • results suggest that children have an ability to understand grammatical rules and transfer them to other examples they’ve never heard before
17
Q

The ‘fis’ phenomenon

A
  • berko and brown, 1960
  • researched the extent to which children can hear the correct pronunciation of words but are unable to always articulate phoenemes accurately themselves - could be through physical limitations or the inability to recognise the errors that are occurring
  • showed a child rejecting an adults articulation of the noun ‘fish’ as ‘fis’
  • goes against skinners behaviourist theory and that sometimes they can’t simply imitate language
18
Q

IRF structure

A
  • Sinclair and couthlard
  • initiation, response, feedback
  • demonstrated that questioning and evaluating are important aspects to CDS
19
Q

Early lexis - Katherine Nelson

A
  • found that 60% of first words were nouns
  • verbs formed second largest group
  • modifiers theirs
  • personal/social words only 8%
20
Q

Eve Clark

A

Over extension + under extension

21
Q

Rescorla

A

Categorically vs. Analogical overextension

22
Q

Jean aitchison

A

Three stages in children’s lexical development:
- labelling
- packaging
- network building

23
Q

Roger brown 1973

A

Suggested that children learn to use inflections in a predictable order:
1. Present participle (running)
2. Plural -s
3. Possessive -s
4. Articles
5. Past tense
6. Third person singular -s
7. Auxiliary verb

24
Q

Bellugi - pronoun development

A

Discovered that children developed their use of pronouns in predictable stages:
1. Gives a name rather than a pronoun
2. Will start to use subject and object pronouns but no accurate consistent application
3. Correctly apply subject and object pronouns

25
Bellugi - constructing negative sentences
Discovered that children developed their use of negative sentence constructions in predictable stages Stage 1: use ‘no’ or ‘not’ at the start of an utterance Stage 2: start to use ‘no’ and ‘not’ in front of verbs in the middle of utterances Stage 3: children become more standardised using primary and modal auxiliary verbs
26
Bellugi - interrogative development
Discovered that children developed their use of interrogatives in predictable stages Stage 1: rise in intonation Stage 2: starts to include interrogative pronouns such as what, where, why Stage 3: starts to do subject-verb inversion and use auxiliary verbs