Pediatric Trauma + Critical Care Flashcards
(262 cards)
Which of the following statements concerning pediatric trauma is true?
A. Trauma is the second leading cause of death in children between 1 and 15 years of age.
B. Computed tomography (CT) is indicated when there is a painful distracting injury, significant head injury, or an unclear examination.
C. Indications for operative intervention include documentation of injury to the spleen or liver on CT.
D. Intraosseous access is the preferred means for delivering fluids or blood in a child younger than 10 years of age.
E. Surgical cricothyroidotomy is an acceptable means of airway control for a child younger than 12 years.
ANSWER: B
COMMENTS: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children between the ages of 1 and 15 years. Motor vehicle accidents, falls, bicycle accidents, and child abuse are the most common causes of traumatic death.
The priorities of resuscitation are airway, breathing, and circulation. Fluid resuscitation is given as 20 mL/kg boluses. Intravenous access is the preferred method of fluid administration. However, if intravenous access cannot be obtained in a timely manner, a specially designed needle can be used to deliver fluids or blood through an intraosseous route in children younger than 6 years, most commonly via the tibia. The needle is placed 1 to 2 cm below the tibial tuberosity through the anteromedial surface of the tibia under sterile conditions.
If hypovolemic shock is refractory to two crystalloid boluses, blood transfusion should be initiated as a 10 mL/ kg bolus.
CT is commonly used to evaluate pediatric trauma patients. CT, which can include chest, abdomen, and pelvis, is indicated when there is an injury elsewhere causing pain, a significant head injury precluding a reliable examination, or if there is an equivocal examination in general.
Although injuries to the liver and spleen are common, the need for operative intervention is not absolute and many patients may be managed nonoperatively if stable.
Surgical cricothyroidotomy should not be attempted in a child younger than 12 years because of the risk of inadvertent airway injury. If an airway is needed, needle cricothyroidotomy can be performed.
An 8-year-old female presents as the restrained passenger after a head-on collision. On the secondary survey, a seatbelt sign is noted. In the pediatric population, what is an associated injury?
A. Chance fracture
B. Duodenal hematoma
C. Colonic perforation
D. Splenic hematoma
E. Hepatic hematoma
ANSWER: A
COMMENTS: Seatbelts in a motor vehicle collision are lifesaving. A “seatbelt sign” is abdominal wall ecchymosis that is in the pattern of a lap belt across the abdomen.
When observed on physical examination, this has been shown to have an increased rate of both solid and hollow organ injury.
In the pediatric population, the triad of abdominal wall hematoma, chance fracture, and jejunal or ileal perforations has been well described.
A chance fracture is a flexion–distraction type injury that involves the anterior, posterior, and transverse portion of the vertebral body of the lumbar spine.
Patients with a seatbelt sign should have a thorough evaluation for intraabdominal injuries as well as vertebral injuries.
These patients should undergo initial imaging with either a CT scan or a focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination and should be admitted for serial abdominal examinations, even with normal initial imaging studies.
What are the most common foreign bodies ingested by children?
The vast majority of ingestions in children are accidental.
The most common type of ingested FB varies by geographic region.
In the United States and Europe, coins are the most common. Other commonly ingested objects include toys, batteries, needles, straight pins, safety pins, screws, earrings, pencils, erasers, glass, fish and chicken bones, and meat.
However, in areas of the world where fish contribute a significant portion of the diet, such as in Asia, a fish bone is the most common FB ingested by children.
When should foreign body ingestion be suspected?
FB ingestions usually present after a witnessed event or disappearance of an object.
Also, there may be heightened suspicion for ingestion by a caregiver based on the child’s description.
The initial presentation can vary from the child being completely asymptomatic to a variety of symptoms including drooling, neck and throat pain, dysphagia, emesis, wheezing, respiratory distress, or abdominal pain/distention.
The majority of patients will have a normal physical exam; however, the child should be evaluated for signs of complications.
Physical exam findings that raise suspicion of potential complications include oropharyngeal abrasions, crepitus, or signs of peritonitis.
What are the most common sites for foreign body impaction in the Esophagus?
The esophagus is the narrowest portion of the alimentary tract and is thus a common site for FB impaction.
Within the esophagus itself, there are three areas of anatomical narrowing that are potential areas of impaction:
the cricopharyngeus sling (70%),
the level of the aortic arch in the mid esophagus (15%), and
the lower esophageal sphincter at the gastroesophageal junction (15%).
Other areas of potential impaction may be found in the esophagus of children who have underlying esophageal pathology (i.e., strictures or eosinophilic esophagitis) or prior esophageal surgery (i.e., esophageal atresia).
Although usually asymptomatic, sharp foreign bodies may penetrate the mucosa at any level and cause mediastinitis, aortoenteric fistula, or peritonitis.
Symptoms of esophageal FB impaction are nonspecific and include drooling, poor feeding, neck and throat pain, vomiting, or wheezing.
Radiopaque objects can be detected on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral neck and chest radiographs, while radiolucent objects may require further workup with a gastrografin esophagram or esophagoscopy depending on the symptoms and provider’s level of suspicion.
What are options for retrieval of ingested coins?
The most common round, smooth object ingested that is amenable to extraction or advancement is a coin.
The majority of esophageal coins will appear en face in the AP view, and from the side on the lateral radiograph.
On occasion, more than one coin will have been ingested, and thus completion esophagoscopy is generally recommended following removal of the first coin.
The location of the object on the radiograph is important in determining the treatment options.
Most FB impactions are located in the proximal esophagus at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter or thoracic inlet.
The majority of FB impactions found in the upper or mid esophagus will remain entrapped and require retrieval.
Options for retrieval include nonemergent endoscopy (rigid or flexible) and Foley balloon extraction with fluoroscopy.
The Foley balloon extraction technique should be limited to round, smooth objects that have been impacted for <1 week in appropriately selected children without any evidence of complications.
This technique was found to have a success rate of 80% while significantly lowering costs.
Objects that are impacted in the lower esophagus often spontaneously pass into the stomach.
For this reason, certain lower esophageal impactions can be observed for a brief duration of time, or attempted to be advanced into the stomach with bougienage or a nasogastric tube in the ED without anesthesia.
Recently, transnasal esophagoscopy has emerged as a new option. Advantages include shortened procedure time and the need for only a local anesthetic.
Rarely, a chronic esophageal coin can cause esophageal perforation, but this will usually be contained.
How do you manage gastrointestinal foreign bodies?
FB ingestions that are found to be distal to the esophagus are usually asymptomatic when discovered.
Signs and symptoms including significant abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, fevers, abdominal distention, or peritonitis should alert the provider to potential complications including obstruction and/or perforation.
The majority of FBs that pass into the stomach will usually pass through the remainder of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract uneventfully.
These patients can be managed as an outpatient.
Occasionally, a FB will remain present in the bowel after a period of observation and serial radiographs.
Prokinetic agents and cathartics have not been found to improve gut transit time and passage of the FB.
Often parents are instructed to strain the child’s stool; however, in up to 50% of cases, the FB is not identified even with successful passage.
If the child remains asymptomatic and the FB has not been identified, a repeat abdominal radiograph can be performed at 2- to 3-week intervals.
Subsequent endoscopy is usually deferred for 4–6 weeks.
Why are esophageal battery ingestion cases associated with increased morbidity?
Battery ingestions deserve special attention due to the potential for significant morbidity associated with esophageal battery impactions.
Button batteries are more commonly ingested than cylindrical batteries in young children.
Symptoms occur in fewer than 10% of cases.
Button batteries will appear as a round, smooth object on radiographs and are often misdiagnosed as coins. However, on close inspection, some larger button batteries will demonstrate a double contour rim.
Esophageal batteries are associated with increased morbidity due to:
1) the tissue injury that can occur through pressure necrosis,
2) release of a low-voltage electric current, or
3) leakage of an alkali solution, which causes a liquefaction necrosis.
This mucosal injury may occur in as little as 1 hour of contact time and may continue even after removal.
Therefore, any suspected case of esophageal battery impaction warrants immediate removal.
Battery size appears to be important as a battery diameter >20 mm has been associated with greater risk of esophageal impaction and higher grade injury.
Following removal, an intraoperative esophagram may be helpful in identifying a full-thickness injury.
Mucosal irregularities and even contained perforations can be seen and may necessitate enteral tube feedings.
Early and late complications of esophageal battery impaction include esophageal perforation, tracheoesophageal fistula, stricture and stenosis, and death.
If the battery is confirmed to be distal to the esophagus in the GI tract and the patient is asymptomatic, then it can be observed, similar to other GI FBs.
More than 80% of batteries that are distal to the esophagus will pass uneventfully within 48 hours.
An updated management algorithm for ingested batteries was recently published.
How should you manage magnet ingestion?
Magnet ingestion can be another source of significant morbidity when multiple magnets or a single magnet and a second metallic FB are ingested simultaneously, or within a short time of each other.
At presentation, fewer than 40% of these patients are symptomatic, with the most common symptom being abdominal pain.
Plain radiographs are most commonly used to confirm the diagnosis. However, radiographs should be interpreted with caution because multiple magnets may appear to be attached at a single point in the GI lumen when, in fact, they are really attached across the bowel wall from two different intestinal lumens.
Therefore, once the ingestion is confirmed on radiographs, close observation for potential complications is important.
Single magnet ingestion distal to the esophagus can be observed in the outpatient setting similar to other GI foreign bodies.
If multiple magnets or a single magnet and a second metallic FB are identified in the esophagus or stomach, endoscopy should be performed to prevent potential subsequent complications.
Once the objects pass distal to the stomach, if separated within the GI tract, they may attach to each other and lead to obstruction, volvulus, perforation, or fistula through pressure necrosis. Therefore, these children, even if asymptomatic, should be observed as an inpatient with serial abdominal exams and radiographs.
If the child becomes symptomatic, develops signs of obstruction on the abdominal radiograph, or shows failure of the objects to progress in 48 hours, then intervention may be warranted.
A management algorithm for ingested magnets was also recently published.
How should you approach ingestion of sharp foreign bodies?
Ingestion of sharp foreign bodies can cause significant morbidity with an associated 15–35% risk of perforation.
Commonly ingested objects include nails, needles, screws, toothpicks, safety pins, and bones.
Perforation is most likely to occur in narrowed portions or areas of curvature in the alimentary tract, especially the ileocecal valve.
Smaller objects and straight pins are associated with lower rates of perforation and can be conservatively managed.
However, other objects should be retrieved endoscopically if possible or observed closely for potential development of complications.
What are bezoars?
A bezoar is a tight collection of undigested material that may often present as a gastric outlet or intestinal obstruction.
These can include lactobezoars (milk), phytobezoars (plant), or trichobezoars (hair).
Presenting symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and abdominal distention.
The diagnosis may be confirmed on plain radiographs, upper GI contrast studies, or endoscopy.
Often due to the size and density of the bezoar, medical management and endoscopic removal are unsuccessful, and operation is necessary.
What is the “push” vs “pull” method for food impaction?
Historically, children presenting with food impaction were taken to the OR for a piecemeal removal of the impaction.
This “pull” technique would often require multiple passes of the endoscope, thus increasing patient morbidity.
More recently, the “push” technique has been studied where a provider would slowly “push” the FB into the stomach.
With proper technique, the historical concerns over distal perforation have been ameliorated.
In a recent study, initial endoscopic disimpaction success rates were 65% for pull and 68% for push endoscopy.
Unsuccessful attempts using one technique were rescued with the other method.
Why are children prone to airway foreign bodies?
Most episodes of aspirated FBs occur while eating or playing.
Appropriate development milestones render children curious who are still in the oral exploration phase of development when everything tends to go into the mouth.
Additionally, children often will cry or run with objects in their mouth.
Overall, these young patients tend to have immature coordination of swallowing and less developed airway protection.
A high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis in these young children and especially in those who are debilitated.
A recent retrospective multi-institutional report on bronchoscopy for FBs from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Program from 2014–2015 in 334 children noted the mean operative time to be 27 minutes.
As expected, the operative time was longer when foreign bodies were in the mainstem bronchus or distal to it.
There was one patient death within 2 weeks of the bronchoscopy.
The annual death rates from FB aspiration is significant with estimates ranging from 220 to 2900 in the United States.
Current data predicts one death per 100,000 children ages 0 to 4 years.
Death caused by suffocation following a FB aspiration is the leading cause of mortality from unintentional injury in children younger than 1 year, and is overall the fifth most common cause of unintentional injury mortality in U.S. children.
Boys are affected twice as often as girls.
Like esophageal FBs, geographical differences have been noted. For example, sunflower seeds are the most common seed aspirated in the United States, yet watermelon seeds are much more common internationally.
One report involving 132 cases noted a high incidence of food aspirations, especially nuts, in children from non-English-speaking backgrounds.
Therefore, there may be a role for public education in targeted communities.
Victims of child abuse represent another community that is at higher risk.
Caregivers should be on alert when tending to a young child with multiple FBs or multiple episodes of aspiration.
Unfortunately, the public health and economic burdens of airway foreign bodies is increasing. In a recent review of the KID database from 2000–2009, charges increased from $93M to $486M in the observed period with charges higher in urban and teaching hospitals.
What are the differences between the airway of younger versus that of older children?
Several anatomical differences are found in the airway of young children compared with older children.
Young children have a shorter airway that is smaller in caliber.
The anterior position of a child’s larynx can increase the difficulty with oral intubation.
Additionally, the subglottic region is the narrowest part of a child’s airway.
The proclivity for FBs to find the right main stem bronchus is well known. Not only is the diameter of the right bronchus larger than the left and airflow generally greater to the right lung, but also the right bronchus has a smaller angle of divergence from the trachea.
This important anatomical feature seems to direct the aspirated FB down into the right bronchus.
When should airway foreign body obstruction be suspected in a child?
Common presenting symptoms include respiratory distress, stridor, and/or wheezing.
Dysphonia may also be observed.
A subtle change in voice or cry may be noted, yet many children will be asymptomatic.
Many aspiration events go unwitnessed.
Laryngeal pathology usually will manifest as inspiratory stridor while tracheal FBs cause expiratory stridor.
Albeit rare, FBs may completely obstruct the larynx or trachea producing sudden death.
Chronic FBs often masquerade as respiratory illnesses with persistent cough and atelectasis, recurrent pneumonia, or hoarseness.
Other late findings include the development of granulation tissue, strictures, perforation, and bronchiectasis.
Following a detailed history, investigation usually turns to AP and lateral films of the neck and chest. If the child is cooperative, inspiratory and expiratory films may be beneficial. Review of the radiograph can reveal hyperinflation or “air trapping” in up to 60% of children as the FB is acting as a one-way valve producing obstructive emphysema.
In time, mediastinal shift may develop.
Decubitus views may also prove helpful because the obstructed lung will not deflate, even while in a dependent position.
Interestingly, in one study, 56% of patients had a normal chest film within 24 hours of aspiration.
Radiopaque FBs are easily identified, but radiolucent FBs become clinically diagnosed through indirect radiographic clues such as hyperexpansion.
Foreign bodies lodged in the larynx or trachea tend to have a higher radiographic detection rate (90%) than those in the bronchus (70%).
A multi-institutional review of 1269 FB events revealed that 85% were correctly diagnosed following a single physician encounter. Therefore, a negative bronchoscopy rate of 10–15% is considered acceptable in order to avoid a delay in treatment with subsequent morbidity.
Radiographic imaging remains helpful in children with a history of choking, yet definitive diagnosis still requires bronchoscopy.
Emergent management of airway FBs can be a dramatic experience. An accurate history remains important, yet sometimes is hard to obtain from small children who are unreliable historians.
The use of the flexible bronchoscope to diagnose a FB followed by a rigid bronchoscopy for removal is a common approach utilized by pediatric surgeons.
General anesthesia in the OR using spontaneous ventilation offers the best chance for safe and successful removal.
Direct and frequent communication with our anesthesia colleagues is imperative as many children will be at risk from bronchospasm, especially if repeated passage of the bronchoscope is needed.
Positive-pressure ventilation may be required, but this technique runs the risk for further propagating the FB into the more distal passages of the airway.
With severely ill children, where transportation presents a logistical risk, rigid bronchoscopy has been performed safely in the intensive care setting.
How is bronchoscopy performed for airway foreign bodies?
We recommend positioning the head in the “sniffing” position with a folded towel under the shoulders. The eyes are taped and protected.
Precautions to minimize secretions, laryngospasm, and hypoxia are employed.
Careful laryngoscopy may reveal a FB that can be retrieved with McGill forceps. More distal evaluation requires direct instrumentation of the airway.
Special precautions must be considered to avoid injuries to the lips, tongue, and most importantly the teeth.
Once the bronchoscopy starts, the operative team must be ready for emergent intubation, or rarely, tracheostomy.
Liberal use of lidocaine (2–4 mg/kg) applied to the glottic area may minimize laryngospasm.
There are several commercial available rigid bronchoscopes. Instruments vary in size between 2.5 cm × 20 cm and 6 × 30 cm. Length and diameter of the bronchoscope will be determined by the age and size of the child.
The Doesel–Huzly bronchoscope with a Hopkins rod-lens telescope or Holinger ventilating bronchoscope is commonly used. Exposure is excellent with both, and the caliber of the scope allows the FB to be retracted into the scope during removal, thereby decreasing the risk of inadvertently dropping the FB during extraction.
Equipment combining optics and illumination while allowing the introduction of working forceps are favored in most children’s hospitals.
These techniques allow for excellent visualization while educating all team members.
The larynx and cords are visualized, and the bronchoscope is advanced to the right of the laryngoscope and into the trachea.
Inspection of the right or left main stem bronchus can be facilitated by turning the head to the opposite side. Angled scopes are generally not needed.
The operative side channel allows passage of suction and retrieval instruments as well as instillation of fluids to help clear a bloody airway.
The ventilation side port allows continuous ventilation during the procedure.
Loose connections from any of these sites can lead to hypoventilation.
Furthermore, if ventilation is impaired, the telescope can be removed, leaving the unobstructed bronchoscope for ventilation.
In difficult cases, especially with FBs lodged distal to the main bronchus, a Fogarty catheter may be helpful to wedge the FB between the bronchoscope and Fogarty balloon.
Partial FB removal will at times be necessary, especially with chronic foreign bodies associated with significant bleeding or airway edema. Prior to the second endoscopy, the child’s condition can be optimized with inhaled epinephrine and intravenous corticosteroids. Most children can return to the OR the following day.
Flexible bronchoscopy remains an option, especially for diagnostic purposes. The standard pediatric flexible bronchoscope has a two-way deflection tip with a range between 180° and 220° and a side port to allow passage of suction catheters and working instruments.
Most newborns can breathe normally around this scope for brief periods of time. A face mask adapter can be used to reduce the risk of hypoxia.
The ultrathin scope (“noodle scope”) can be inserted through smaller caliber endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes while maintaining ventilation. However, these scopes have very limited, if any, working channels and suction capability.
Overall complications of rigid or flexible endoscopy include bleeding from local inflammation, laryngospasm, pneumothorax, and hypoxia, with the more serious complications being found in the youngest patients.
A lack of experience, poor visualization, and inadequate instrumentation contribute to failure with bronchoscopy. Many of these cases are seen at night, and OR personnel frequently struggle to locate the required instruments. The surgeon performing the procedure must ensure that all of the needed instruments are in working order before the child is brought to the operating room.
A preoperative “game plan” between nursing, anesthesia, and surgical staff is also important.
Bleeding that obscures visualization is common, and the introduction of a small suction catheter through the working channel may be helpful.
In other cases, partial FB removal is recommended with a plan to return to the OR the next day. Rarely a thoracotomy with bronchotomy or lobectomy is required.
Following successful removal, attention to proper cleaning of the instruments is important, given that inadequate cleaning and storage may predispose to cracks in the equipment that could lead to bacterial contamination.
Maintaining bronchoscopic skills remains necessary to effectively manage these difficult cases. Across undergraduate and graduate medical education, simulation continues to gain momentum. In a setting of low procedural volume, simulation with deliberate practice fosters competency. Several institutions have developed simulation courses for residents to improve psychomotor skills associated with airway FBs. Objectives include an understanding of the tracheobronchial anatomy, ability to adequately visualize the larynx with laryngoscopy, proficiency in rigid bronchoscopy, and familiarity with FB instrumentation. Of note, in one institution that held a simulation course among otolaryngology residents, success in assembling the needed instruments and completing the assigned tasks increased to 81% and 43%, respectively, at the completion of the course. These simulators have offered value and relevance to experienced and novice practitioners while still adapting for material response. One would expect further development of simulation exercises to be useful for credentialing and continued proficiency for both trainees and faculty.
What is most common source of bite wounds?
Dogs are the most common source of bite wounds, costing over $1 billion per year in the United States alone.
Bites occur most frequently in males ages 5–9 years of age when compared with bites in adults.
The increased incidence in children has been attributed to their smaller size, lack of awareness, and playful manner when interacting with pets, leading these pets to attack them, often in a playful manner.
Bites more frequently occur in the summer months by animals that are well known to the child and frequently from a pet owned by an immediate family member.
Children under 10 years of age are most frequently bitten on their head or neck while older children are more frequently bitten on their distal extremities.
Based on a 1-year telephone survey of over 5000 randomly dialed households to estimate the incidence of dog bites and those seeking treatment, there were an estimated 377,000 children who sought treatment after dog bites in the United States, which is twice the number of adults seeking treatment for dog bites.
One recent study looked at 1017 bite wounds in children and found that bites occur most frequently in children younger than 5 years old and decreased in incidence throughout adulthood. In this series, 66% of the bites were to the head and neck region. Younger children experienced more head or neck wounds, and older children and adults experienced more extremity injuries.
The majority (72%) were from dogs belonging to family or friends.
Sixty-seven percent of patients were sutured in the emergency department, 25% underwent local wound care, and 6% required operative repair.
The authors noted the stability in the epidemiology of bite wounds over the past five decades and the need for improved preventive strategies.
In another study, a 5% hospital admission rate was found among a cohort of 1347 dog bites in children and another 4% were observed for 23 hours.
The mean length of stay was 7 days for children younger than 5 years old, and 3–4 days for children 5–18 years.
On multivariate regression, risk factors for admission were a bite to the head or neck, whereas age was not a significant factor.
The median charge was $300 for those seen in the emergency room, $3600 for those admitted to an observation unit, and $5900 for those who were hospitalized.
In another study of 769 dog bite victims prospectively evaluated over a 2-year period, evidence of a superficial wound infection was present in 2.5% of patients on presentation and in 2.1% of patients at follow-up.
Predictors of developing an infection included a deep wound, female gender, and wounds requiring debridement.
A recent multicenter prospective study reviewed 495 patients with dog bites, 18 of which developed infections. They found puncture wounds and wounds closed primarily to be at increased risk of becoming infected and recommended prophylactic antibiotics for these patients.
At our institution, a level I pediatric trauma center, 69 children admitted for treatment of dog bites were reviewed for this chapter. Of these, 94% required operative debridement and laceration repair. We found that 98% of patients under 5 years of age presented with a bite to the head and neck region, compared with 48% in patients older than age 5 years.
Severe injuries, such as a tracheal laceration, penetrating cranial laceration, cervical spine injury, foot amputations, and vascular lacerations, were also seen. Although all were treated with antibiotics, 17% displayed signs of wound infection during or after their hospital stay.
Although there were no deaths in our series, dog bites in children can be fatal. Approximately 25–35 patients die each year from dog bites, the majority being children. The deaths are usually from bites to the head, neck, or vital organs.
Pitbulls in particular are a common dog breed that bite and cause fatal bites.
Why do cat bites manifest with infection more rapidly than dog bites?
Cats are the second most common source of bites, with an estimated incidence of 400,000 per year.
One study looking at 643 cat and dog bites reported to the El Paso Animal Regulation and Disease Control Center revealed that 89% of cat bites were provoked. Interestingly, in this study, only 45% of dog bites were provoked.
Females and adults seem more likely to be victims of cat bites, whereas dog bites may be more common in males and children.
One retrospective review found that 65% of cat bite wounds occurred on the upper extremities, 20% on the head and neck, 10% on the lower extremities, with fewer than 5% on the trunk.
Cats have long, narrow teeth that are more likely to penetrate bones and joints, leading to deep abscesses and osteomyelitis.
In one large retrospective study looking at 1592 patients presenting after mammalian bites, the infection rates for dog bites was 15% and for cat bites was 37%.
In this study, cat bites manifested signs of infection more rapidly when compared with dog bites (12 vs 24 hours).
Why do human bites have a higher complication rate than animal bites?
The incidence of human bites is difficult to determine because many patients do not seek medical care.
Human bites generally compress tissue but rarely avulse the skin and soft tissue like animal bites.
A “fight bite” occurs when a fist hits a tooth and is often dismissed by patients. These occur from clenched fists and frequently involve the distal phalanx of the long or index finger of the dominant hand.
However, these fight bites can cause significant morbidity due to infection.
Human bites have a higher complication and infection rate compared with animal bites. Infections from human bites frequently contain aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and antibiotics need to cover for these anaerobes.
Coverage for Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Eikenella, as well as anaerobic organisms such as Fusobacterium, Prevotella, and Veillonella is needed.
In a multicenter, prospective study of 50 patients with infected human bites, the median number of bacteria isolated per wound culture was 4 (3 aerobes and 1 anaerobe).
Streptococcus anginosus was the most common (52%).
Bites to the hands are often deep and are more likely to become infected compared with bites to other areas.
When is secondary intention for closure of bite wounds indicated?
Management of bite wounds involves the basic tenets of wound care, including wound irrigation and debridement of any necrotic tissue.
A large-bore blunt needle connected to a syringe can provide adequate pressure to clean these wounds.
Radiographic studies should be obtained when there is a concern for bone or joint penetration, and the tetanus immunization status should be investigated.
Rabies prophylaxis is important when indicated.
In one study the most common complication from bites was infection: cats, 16–50%; dogs, 1–30%; and humans, 9–18%.
When the bite is from a cat, dog, or other mammal, the most common infectious organisms are Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Actinomycetes, Pasteurella species, Capnocytophaga species, Moraxella species, Corynebacterium species, Neisseria species, Eikenella corrodens, Haemophilus species, anaerobes, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Prevotella melaninogenica.
Human bites are a potential source not only for bacterial contamination but also for hepatitis B and, possibly, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Recommendations for management of a bite wound are shown in Box 12.1.
Evidence-based studies concerning whether to close wounds are not conclusive. Prospective trials, looking at primary closure of bites, have shown low rates of infection after primary closure, and two randomized controlled studies comparing primary closure to nonclosure showed no difference in infection rates after primary closure. In these studies, primary closure improved cosmesis and reduced healing times.
Wounds to the distal extremities and puncture wounds have been shown to have a higher rate of infection, and some providers recommend not closing distal puncture wounds or wounds that have been open for more than 6–12 hours before washout.
Additionally, consideration could be given to not closing wounds that are visibly infected, or closing them loosely over a Penrose drain or vessel loop.
Facial wounds have a low rate of infection due to the rich blood supply, and many surgeons advocate for closing these lacerations after irrigation and debridement.
Whether wounds at minimal risk require prophylactic antimicrobial therapy is also controversial. Antibiotics started within 8–12 hours of the bite and continued for 2–3 days may decrease the infection rate.
The oral drug of choice is amoxicillin-clavulanate. For penicillin-allergic patients, an extended-spectrum cephalosporin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole plus clindamycin can be used.
It is possible to reduce the incidence of animal bites through anticipatory guidance. Guidelines are available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (https://www.cdc.gov/features/dogbite-prevention/index.html) to aid physicians in counseling parents.
Which injuries are most prone to tetanus infection?
The Gram-positive anaerobic organism Clostridium tetani is the causative agent for tetanus, a severe and often fatal disease. In 2009 there were a total of 18 cases (zero under 14 years of age) reported in the United States.
There has been a low incidence rate of tetanus since a peak of 102 cases in 1975. Mortality from tetanus is associated with comorbid conditions such as diabetes, intravenous drug use, and old age, especially when the patient’s vaccination status is unknown.
Infection can occur weeks after a break in the skin, even after a wound appears to be healed.
The anaerobic environment allows spores to germinate into mature organisms producing two neurotoxins: tetanolysin and tetanospasmin. The latter is able to enter peripheral nerves and travel to the brain, causing the clinical manifestations of uncontrolled muscle spasms and autonomic instability.
The incubation period varies from as short as 2 days to several months, with most cases occurring within 14 days.
In general, the shorter the incubation period, the more severe the disease is and the higher the risk of death.
Initially, the diagnosis is made clinically because cultures are often negative and serology for antitoxin antibodies takes a long time to process.
So-called dirty wounds (lacerations treated after 24 hours, abscesses, ulcers, gangrene, and wounds with nonviable tissue) are the most common injuries that become infected with tetanus.
However, a history of trauma is not necessary for tetanus infection.
All wounds should be cleaned and debrided. Symptomatic and supportive care includes medications such as benzodiazepines to control tetanic spasms and antimicrobials for infection.
Metronidazole (oral or intravenous, 30 mg/ kg/day, divided into four daily doses, maximum 4 g/day) is the preferred antibiotic because it decreases the number of vegetative forms of C. tetani.
An alternative choice is parenteral treatment with penicillin G (100,000 units/kg/ day every 4–6 hours, not to exceed 12 million units/day) for 7–10 days.
Human tetanus immunoglobulin (TIG) is administered to adults and adolescents as a one-time dose of 3000–6000 units intramuscularly.
Some authors recommend that children receive 500 units to decrease the discomfort from injection.
Infiltrating part of the dose directly into the wound is controversial.
Immunoglobulin intravenous (IGIV) can be used at dose 200 to 400 mg/kg if TIG is not available.
Tetanus prevention in a potentially exposed patient depends on the nature of the wound and history of immunization with tetanus toxoid.
What prophylactic treatment is advised for humans potentially exposed to rabies?
Rabies is a viral disease usually transmitted through the saliva of a sick mammal (dogs, cats, ferrets, raccoons, skunks, foxes, bats, and most other carnivores).
Small rodents such as rats, mice, squirrels, chipmunks, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits, and gerbils are almost never infected with rabies.
The rabies virus enters the central nervous system and causes an acute, progressive encephalomyelitis from which survival is extremely unlikely.
The human host has a wide range for the incubation period from days to years (most commonly weeks to months).
As a result of canine vaccination programs and stray animal control, there has been a marked decrease in rabies in the United States in recent decades.
In 2006, 79 cases were reported in domestic dogs and only 3 in humans, but none were transmitted from the domestic dogs.
Each year in the United States, approximately 16,00039,000 people come into contact with potentially rabid animals and receive rabies postexposure prophylaxis.
Prophylactic treatment for humans potentially exposed to rabies includes immediate and thorough wound cleansing followed by passive vaccination with human rabies immunoglobulin and cell culture rabies vaccines, either human diploid or purified chick embryo.
Many factors determine the risk assessment in deciding which patient benefits from postexposure prophylaxis and which regimen should be given.
The risk of infection depends on the type of exposure, surveillance, epidemiology of animal rabies in the region of contact, species of animal, animal behavior causing it to bite, and the availability of the animal for observation or laboratory testing for the rabies virus.
The final decision for treatment with vaccines is complex. Therefore, local, state, or CDC experts are available for assistance. There is no single effective treatment for rabies once symptoms develop.
Which are the two most medically important spiders in the US?
There are about 40,000 species of spiders that have been named and placed in about 3000 genera and 105 families.
In regard to medically relevant spiders, few are known to cause significant clinical effects. It is rare that a spider bite requires surgical care.
Few spiders have been shown to have the ability to bite humans because their fangs cannot pierce the skin.
The two most medically important spiders in the United States are Sicariidae (brown spiders) and Latrodectus (widow spiders).
How do you diagnose a brown recluse spider envenomation?
Loxoscelism is a form of cutaneous–visceral (necroticsystemic) arachnidism found throughout the world, with a predilection for North and South America.
There are four species of brown spiders within the United States known to cause necrotic skin lesions (Loxosceles deserta, L. arizonica, L. rufescens, and L. reclusa). L. deserta and L. arizonica can be found in the southwestern United States.
L. reclusa, known as the brown recluse spider, is the most common species associated with human bites. It is usually found in the south-central United States, especially Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Kentucky.
Spiders can be transported out of their natural habitat but rarely cause arachnidism in nonendemic areas.
L. reclusa is tan to brown with a characteristic dark, violin-shaped marking on its dorsal cephalothorax, giving it the nickname “fiddleback” or “violin” spider. The spider can measure up to 1 cm in total body length with a 3-cm or longer leg span. These spiders have only three pairs of eyes, whereas most spiders have four pairs.
The incidence of L. reclusa bites predominantly occurs from April through October in the United States.
The venom of the brown recluse spider contains at least 11 protein components. Most are enzymes with cytotoxic activity. Sphingomyelinase D is believed to be the enzyme responsible for dermonecrosis and activity on red blood cell membranes.
In addition to the local effects, the venom has activity against neutrophils and the complement pathway that induces an immunologic response. The resulting effect is a necrotic dermal lesion and the possibility that a systemic response from the child or adult will be life threatening.
The prevalence of brown recluse spider envenomations is unknown. The victim may not feel the bite or may feel only a mild pinprick sensation. Many victims are bitten while they sleep and may be unaware of the envenomation until a wound develops. The majority of victims do not see the spider at the time of the bite.
Typically, the bite progressively begins to itch and tingle and becomes ecchymotic, indurated, and edematous within several hours. Often within hours, a characteristic bleb or bullae will form. The tissue under the blister is likely to become necrotic, but the extent of necrosis is not predictable.
As the ischemia and inflammation progresses, the wound becomes painful and may blanch or become erythematous, forming a “target” or “halo” design. Inflammation, ischemia, and pain increase over the first few days after the bite as the toxic enzymes spread.
Over hours to weeks, an eschar forms at the site of the bite. Eventually, this eschar sloughs, revealing an underlying ulcer that may require months to heal, usually by secondary intention. On rare occasions, the ulcer does not heal and requires surgical intervention.
The need for hospitalization occurs if the patient develops systemic symptoms.
The true incidence of systemic loxoscelism is unknown because a spider is identified in a minority of cases. Thus, there is often insufficient proof that the symptoms are related to the spider bite.
However, one study showed the utility of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to confirm the Loxosceles venom in a patient with hemolytic anemia when no spider was identified.
Other common symptoms include a maculopapular rash, nausea and vomiting, headache, malaise, muscle and joint pain, hepatitis, pancreatitis, and other organ toxicity. Lifethreatening systemic effects include hemolysis (intravascular and/or extravascular), coagulopathy, and multiple organ system failure. Secondary effects include sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, and shock.
Hemolysis usually manifests within the first 96 hours. However, late presentations also can occur. When hemolysis does develop, it can take 4–7 days (or longer) to resolve.
Complications such as cardiac dysrhythmias, coma, respiratory compromise, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, renal failure, and seizures can occur.
The diagnosis of a brown recluse spider envenomation is largely one of exclusion because it is rare to see or identify the spider. Although the wound can appear classic for an envenomation, other causes must be considered.
Certain laboratory findings can be consistent with a brown recluse spider envenomation but are not specific in making the diagnosis.