Peer Review And Psychological Research And The Economy Flashcards
(5 cards)
The role of peer review
The assessment of scientific work by others who are specialists in the same field, to ensure that any research intended for publication is of high quality
- the experts should conduct an objective review and be unknown to the researchers
The aims of peer review
- To allocate research funding - deciding whether to award funding to the research project
- Validate the quality and relevance of research - R is assessed on quality and accuracy e.g. hypothesis, conclusions
- Suggest improvements - researchers can suggest minor improvements or an extreme case, the work cant be published
Evaluate peer review
Anonymity
- normally the ‘peer’ doing the reviewing remains anonymous
BUT - reviewers can use the anonymity as a way of criticising the rival researchers {all want theirs to be published, competition for funding}
Publication bias
- research’s can be selective in what they publish, to make it seem more ‘headline grabbing’. Data can be ignored.
Burying groundbreaking research
- may slow down the rate of change within a field - established scientists as peer reviewers are more likely to pass findings that chime with the current option than innovative ideas.
Attachment research into the role of the father {implications on the economy}
- research has found that both parents are equally capable of providing the emotional support necessary for healthy psychological development
… promotes more flexible working arrangements within the family - many couples share childcare responsibilities throughout the week
… means modern parents are better equipped to maximise their income - contribute to the economy
The development of treatments for mental disorders
- absence from work costs the economy billions a year
- the development of drugs e.g. SSRI’s and cognitive therapies e.g. CBT
… means that people with mental disorders are able to manage their condition and return to work