people and studies exam #3 Flashcards
(32 cards)
Walster 1966
physical attractiveness is most important in determining likability
Brand 2012
dating profiles of handsome men were judged to have better text content
(what is beautiful is good stereotype)
Zebrowitz 1996
men and women prefer facial features that signal youth
Langlios & Roggman
less unique faces were judged as more attractive
Peterson & Hyde 2010
women prefer status over physical attraction more in cultures in which women have a lower status
Back 2008
students are more likely to report themselves as friends with the people sitting closer to them even if the seating is done by the professor
festinger 1950
residents of a large housing complex are more likely to make friends with immediate neighbors…and people who live in high traffic areas (near mailboxes or stairways) are more likely to report having more friends overall
moreland and beach 1992
had female confederates attend large classes either 5, 10 or 15 times. Students were shown pictures of the confederates and asked “do you recognize this student” and “ how much do you like this student”. The number of visits did not affect recognition, but it did increase liking.
white 1981
had male college students run in place for either 15 or 120 seconds and then watched a video of either an attractive or unattractive person describing their hobbies. The participants who ran for a longer amount of time had a more extreme rating of attractiveness of the person
Aron 1992
using the Inclusion of other in the self (IOS) scale found that a stronger relationship or a more satisfying relationship will report feeling more like one person instead of two
Lamiex & Hale 2002
long term relationships reported less passion and intimacy, and higher commitment → commitment predicts duration
Aron 1997
manipulates self-disclosure of intimate thoughts by pairing college students with another college student that they did not know. Those who shared more personal thoughts rated themself closer to the other person
Mkenna 2002
many people have a close relationship with someone they met online, 25% of people got engaged, or are cohabitating with someone they met online → online communication is influencing the development of relationships
reagan 1972
activated guilt in a field study, found that ps are more likely to be altruistic if they already feel guilty even about something unrelated
C. Danial Batson
true altruism exists in the form of empathy
Toi
ps evaluated a tape for a new radio program in which someone talks about pretty severe struggles. Participants are given an envelope asking if they would help this person. They are either presented with a high or low cost, and a request of high or low empathy. This demonstrated the difference between social exchange and true altruism
Paul Bloom
babies know the social value and preference of altruistic or helpful traits from an early age this supports the innate or nature aspect of the development of altruism
Darley & Batson 2011
seminary students walking to deliver a speech they wrote; encountered a seemingly sick confederate in a hallway. Those who were less late were more likely to help since it had little to no cost to them.
hardy and Van Vugt 2006
being cooperative results in higher social status
Batson
when given the chance, students are more likely to lie to their own benefit if nobody is watching, trade-offs exist between helping ourselves and helping others
Latane & Darley 1970
if nobody else reacts to a situation, we are less likely to react any differently than they are
Batson 1989
categorized students into externally religious vs internally religious, found that internally religious people are more likely to help than externally religious people
Dooly 1995
had participants read about a person who contracted AIDS from different origins/ in different ways. Found that when the origin of the condition was due to external factors/situational attributions, people were more likely to help.
berman 2009
increased serotonin levels seemed to increase the regulation of aggression