Perception Flashcards
(35 cards)
Apperceptive Agnosia
Impairment due to deficits in perceptual processing.
- dorsal route
- view dependent
- bottom up processing
- where how
Associative Agnosia -
Perception in tact except difficulties in accessing relevant knowledge about objects from memory.
- Oliver Saks glove example
- ventral
- view invariant - top down
- what
Object Agnosia
Impaired object recognition but intact facial recognition
Structural encoding
Various representations or descriptions of faces
Expression analysis
An emotional state can be inferred from facial features
Facial speech analysis
Speech perception can be aided by observing lip movements
Directed visual processing
Special facial info may be processed selectively
Face recognition units
Structural info about known faces
Person identity nodes
Information about individuals (eg occupation, interests)
Cog system
Contains additional info (eg actors tend to have attractive faces) and influences which other components receive attention
Support
Double dissociation - across patients w an impairment on either face recognition or expression identification
- In a study, participants never reported putting a name to a face while knowing nothing else about that person
Visual Agnosia
Impairment of visual object recognition despite otherwise preserved visual abilities
Limitations
The model omits the first stage of processing (i.e., detecting that they‘re looking at a face)
Facial identity and facial expression may not be entirely independent
There may be multiple systems for facial expressions
The emotional system may play a far more integral role here
Posed expressions
lack congruent feeling (i.e. happiness)
- lack congruent feeling (i.e. happiness)
Spontaneous facial expressions
are known as “Duchenne” expressions.
Expressed with congruent feeling (i.e. feeling happy and smiling)
Uses the cingulate and basal ganglia.
Visual mental imagery
occurs when a visual STM representation is present but the stimulus is not actually being viewed
Visual imagery is accompanied by the experience of “seeing with the mind‘s eye”
Evidence of Interference
Baddeley and Andrade (2000)
Since visual imagery and spatial tapping are assumed to share the visual buffer, doing both simultaneously should impair performance
Gibson - Direct Perception
Suggested that perceptual information is used primarily in the organisation of action
Held that perception and action are closely intertwined
One influences the other without any need for complex cognitive processing
Took an ecological approach in this direct theory of perception
Optic Flow
Optic flow field as a pilot comes in to land, with the focus of expansion in the middle.
Affordances
Potential uses of objects (graspable v non-graspable)
Perceived directly
Participants are quicker to make grasping movements to objects that can be grasped
Strengths
Emphasized the interaction between perception and action
Captured the DORSAL vision-for-action system before it became common
Limitations
Processes involved in perception are much more complicated than implied by Gibson
Largely ignored the vision-for-perception (VENTRAL) system
Does not fully capture all the relevant sources of information
Glover
Planning-Control Model
Planning System
Mostly used before initiation of movement
Selects an appropriate target
Decides how the object will be grasped
Determines the timing of the movement
Uses both spatial and non-spatial information
Relatively slow
Planning depends on:
A visual representation located in the inferior parietal lobe
Motor processes in the frontal lobes and basal ganglia