Periodontal Prognosis and Maintenance Flashcards

1
Q

List and describe the 8 systemic periodontal risk factors

A
Uncontrolled diabetes (Type I or II):
• Poor wound healing due to impaired immune response
• Increased glucose in GCF changes composition of bacteria leading to more pathogenic bacteria

Genetics (which predispose to perio destruction):
• IL-1 phenotype- host response is altered
• Inadequate numbers or reduced function of circulating neutrophils
• Disorders such as neutropenia, agranulocytosis, lazy leukocyte syndrome, Down syndrome

Psychological Stress:
• Leads to a depressed immune response
• Lowered host resistance
• Release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6)
• Stress also leads to other behaviours like smoking, nutritional deficiencies

Hormonal changes:
• exaggerated immune response to biofilm

Smoking:
• Prevalence of perio pathogens is greater
• Neutrophil (PMN), B-cell & T-cell functions are impaired
• Altered fibroblast function
• Reduced gingival vascularity= poor healing, migration of PMNS, waste removal

Medications:
• gingival hyperplasia caused by epileptic medications

Osteoporosis

Cardiovascular disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List and describe the 7 local periodontal risk factors

A

· Gingival overhang/ Deficient restorations

· Overcrowding and tooth morphology (talons cusps, deep fissures)

· Open contacts

· Calculus

· Tooth embrasures

· Occlusal forces

· Oral hygiene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List the modifiable periodontal risk factors

A
  • Smoking
  • Diabetes
  • Oral hygiene
  • Crowded teeth
  • Gingival overhangs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List the non- modifiable periodontal risk factors

A
  • Genetics
  • Cardiovascular tooth loss
  • Osteoporosis/ hormonal changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

List the 6 components of the Lang & Tonetti’s Risk Assessment Tool

A

At the three month review, look at:
• Percentage bleeding on probing

  • Residual pockets > 5mm
  • Loss of teeth from a total 28
  • Loss of periodontal support in relation to patient’s age
  • Systemic and genetic conditions
  • Environmental factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the 6 components of the Lang & Tonetti’s Risk Assessment Tool

A

At the three month review, look at:
• Percentage bleeding on probing: reflects ability to perform proper plaque control, the host response to bacteria and the patients compliance

  • Prevalence of residual pockets > 5mm: Shows, to an extent, the success of periodontal treatment
  • Loss of teeth from a total 28: Teeth are important for the functionality of the dentition.
  • Loss of periodontal support in relation to patient’s age: Evaluates the height of the alveolar bone and considers the patients age. This is recorded for posterior regions
  • Systemic and genetic conditions: Having type 1 and 2 diabetes. In addition, possessing IL-1 genotype (found in advanced periodontitis). If unknown, this is not considered
  • Environmental factors such as cigarette smoking: Heavy smokers are at high risk, moderate - low smokers are considered at moderate risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain how the Lang and Tonetti’s risk assessment is recorded

A

Recorded as a web- diagram:
• Low Risk: area closest to the centre and within boundary of first bold ring

  • Moderate Risk: area located between the first and second bold ring
  • High Risk: area furthest from centre and outside second bold ring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the benefits of using a Risk Assessment Tool

A
  • Helps motivate patients as it is a visual representation
  • Helps assess patient compliance
  • Provides an insight into prognosis and the need for referrals where appropriate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the disadvantages of using a Risk Assessment Tool

A
  • Does not account for clinical attachment loss. It does not give a true and accurate picture of loss of periodontal support
  • Does not factor into account reasons for tooth loss (may not be due to periodontal issues). Can result in a poor diagnosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Discuss prognosis as it relates to periodontal disease and its usefulness

A

In terms of prognosis in periodontics, there is an overall prognosis and prognosis for individual teeth.

Establishing prognosis helps helps determine whether it makes more sense to attempt certain treatments or to withhold them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the assessment of overall prognosis

A

It involves evaluating the patient’s medical and social history and performing a periodontal examination/assessment. The results of the examination leads to the prognosis.

The following variables are established:
• Extent of disease (localised or generalised)
• Severity of disease (attachment loss)
• Patient’s ability and consistency in effective plaque removal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the assessment of tooth prognosis

A
Following factors are considered:
• Furcation involvement
• Mobility
• Root anatomy
• Attachment loss (must consider tooth to root ratio)
• < 4mm attachment loss = good prognosis
• > 7mm attachment = poor prognosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define the 5 terms used to describe periodontal prognosis

A
  • Good prognosis: Control of aetiologic factors and adequate periodontal support ensure the tooth will be easy to maintain by the patient and clinician
  • Fair prognosis: Approximately 25% attachment loss and/or Class I furcation involvement (location and depth allow proper maintenance with good patient compliance)
  • Poor prognosis: 50% attachment loss, Class II furcation involvement (location and depth make maintenance possible but difficult)
  • Questionable prognosis: >50% attachment loss, poor crown-to-root ratio, poor root form, Class II furcations (location and depth make access difficult) or Class III furcation involvements; >2+ mobility; root proximity
  • Hopeless prognosis: Inadequate attachment to maintain health, comfort, and function
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

List the 6 prognostic factors as described by the Miller-McEntire Scoring Index

A
  • Smoking: Highest predictive indicator of tooth loss
  • Probing depths
  • Mobility
  • Furcation
  • Molar type
  • Age: least predictive indicator of tooth loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the role of Supportive Periodontal Therapy (SPT) or Maintenance

A

Rationale:
• Residual plaque regrows in pockets
• Bacteria may recolonise- can return to pre-treatment levels in days to months
• New connective tissue reattachment (long junctional epithelial) results in weaker dentogingival unit and inflammation. It may rapidly separate from tooth

Thus, it is important to call the patient for a review to address these issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the processes involved in Supportive Periodontal Therapy (SPT) or Maintenance

A

Examination and Re-evaluation:
• Update changes to Med Hx, perform extra- & intra-oral examinations evaluating soft tissues, restorations, caries, prostheses, tooth mobility, etc
• Take radiographs as needed & compare with previous

Check Plaque Control
• Must be reviewed and corrected for effective daily plaque control
• May require behaviour modification and motivation revision of methods and/or homecare aids/devices

17
Q

List instances where referrals are needed during Supportive Periodontal Therapy (SPT) or Maintenance

A
  • pocket depth is greater the 6mm
  • teeth with furcations are difficult or impossible to debride
  • consider particularly difficult periodontal case, patients with complex medical conditions, dental implant patients and those with complex prothetic construction