Political Realism, Machiavelli and Hobbes Flashcards

(20 cards)

1
Q

The end of medieval conceptions of peace among christian nations

A

new idea on human nature, peace and war. Breakdown of Christendom in 16th century because of the rise of new nations and monarchies. Emphasis on the individual instead of the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Crisis of the early Renaissance (3)

A

Diminishing authority of the church and concept of ‘just war’ subject to controversy.
Early Italian humanist challenged the doctrine.
Changes in military techonogy rendered conflicts more brutal (pessimistic view of mankind)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Machiavelly, “centaur”

A

In ‘The Prince’, ruler should be half-beast, half-human, being able to use both law and force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

New monarchies vs the former unity of Christendom

A

Canon law loses influence over the conduct of war.
Chivalry loses its appeal with the passing of feudal system
Secularization of political authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Moderate realism

A

morality should not always govern state conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Radical realism

A

Morality should never govern state conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Machiavelli, governance

A

good government not ethical by nature, but ready to do whatever to garantee the stability and prosperity of the state. Key concept: Necessity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Augustine vs Machiavelli

A

Augusitine: war is to be avoided, can only be justified if it is to bring peace.
Machiavelli: Necessity is dictated by the logic of power, not by a desire for peace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Machiaveli, recurring patterns

A

People have the same desires, thus their actions have the same results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Machiavelli, Cruelties

A

some are badly used, others well used. Key idea is necessity, if they are well used, those who use them can remedy themselves with God and men. Those cruelty must be done all at once, so that after we can slowly do good and people will forgive us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Machiavelli, humans

A

driven by their own self interests, insatiable quest for wealth, honor and power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Machiavelli, religion

A

rejects its place in political theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mchiavelli, raison d’état

A

justification for the prince’s action, even if they could be considered immoral, what is good for the sate is good for humankind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Machiavelli, Conduct of the Prince

A

Should appear to conform to Christian virtues for legitimacy, but must sometimes act against his faith (necessity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Machiavelli, functioning of the state

A

A state requires justice (to restrain) and arms (to protect) to survive and grow. Justice is only within th state, outside is necessity only that dictates if we should wage war or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Machiavelli’s Art of War arguments

A

Virtue is required for soldiers. Against merceneries, army should belong to the people.

16
Q

Hobbes, Human nature

A

Good and Evil only terms to describe an individual’s desires, can only be restrained by law, it is not bad or our fault that we have these desires.

17
Q

Hobbes, State of nature

A

Anarchy, war of all against all

18
Q

Hobbes, soldier/political authority

A

political authority and the obligation of a soldier comes only from the sovereign’s ability to protect and keep peace

19
Q

Hobbes, conquest

A

If a soldier becomes subject to a conqueror, he has no obligations toward his former sovereign