poverty on decision making Flashcards

1
Q

Shah 2012

why do poor behave in ways that reinforces their poverty

A
  1. environmental factors = lack of education, bad health, working conditions
  2. psychological factors = personality
  3. behaviours and perspectives = resource scarcity affects the decisions they make - they make certain decisions that keep them poor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how does behaviour keep poor poor

A
  • constantly thinking about tradeoffs
  • expenditure has an immediate opportunity cost
  • REQUIRES MORE COGNITIVE RESOURCES than being rich
  • more calculations and decisions about decisions
  • neglect less salient problems like investing in human capital for food issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how does being poor affect decision making

A
  1. reduces willingness to take risks = more risk averse
  2. present biased = reduce willingness forgo current income in exchange for higher future income
    - less likely to invest in technology, education
    * poverty increases behaviours that makes it harder to escape poverty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dohmen

A
  • poor people have higher discount rates and more risk averse than rich people
  • is this causal
  • what is the direction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Carvalho 2016
- identifying causal effect of poverty

A
  • testing if poor people exhibit higher present bias
  • surveyes people before and after payday
  • ## questions to do with present bias / risk aversion / cognitive function / expenditure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

results of survey = do poor people exhibit present bias

A
  • just before payday people spend less and have higher present bias for money
  • liquidity constraint increases present bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Haushofer and Fehr 2014

  • does happiness make you rich
  • does being rich make you happy

result Kenyan

A

correlation between happiness and income
- tranfers 0, 400, 1500 to poor Kenyan households
- measure happiness and stress levels after the transfer and compare to control = no transfer

  • transfers = increase happiness and reduce stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • experiment to test if stress causally affect risk and time preferences
  • Cohn et al
A
  • subjects engaged in risk taking tasks while receiving either painless or painful shock
  • the anticipation of the pain induces fear
  • results
  • those where fear generated put less into the risky options compared to no fear (painless shocks)
  • fear reduces risk taking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Induced cortisol results

A
  • those injected with chronic cortisol are most risk averse compared to others
  • placebo and acute cortisol
  • more stress = less risk taking = more impatient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

showing the clips

A
  • show participants sad or neutral videos to induce emotional states
  • people that watch the impatient video and more impatient than those that watch the neutral video
  • more emotional = more impatient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

classical econ thoughts on emotions

A

no link between emotional state and decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is prosociality and why do we care

A
  • prosociality = behaviour that benefits the society as a whole
  • prosociality is an important aspect of social and economic outcomes
  • like provision of goods, contract enforcement, growth
  • individually = happyness education and earnings
  • helping and sharing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how does prosociaity develop

A

childhood it develops
- children in developed countries from low income lack prosocial skills
- less trusting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

does social environment and interventions affect prosociality development in kids

A
  • environment: socioeconomic status SES, parent child interaction, parental prosocilaity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Kosse et al
Baloo and you mentoring scheme
- does exogenous enrichment of the social environment cause more trust and altruism in disavantaged children

A
  • randomised controlled trials involving mentoring programme for low SES children
  • used low and high Socioeconomic status families
  • mentoring helps with social skills weekly
  • interactive joint activities
  • measuring social preferences:

altruism = 3 dictator games
trust = do i agree “i can trust “
interviewed mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

results from Baloo and you

A
  • looking at regression analysis
  • when all explanatory variables in the model
  • SES is not driving prosociality of children
  • prosociality of mother and social interaction is
17
Q

comparing results from LOw and high SES kids

A

low and no mentoring
- lowest prosocial score
low and mentoring
- more prosocial than kids without mentoring
- no statistical difference between sociality of these and high ses

after 2 years
- low and no = prosocial skills lagging behind
- low with mentoring still statistically indifferent between high SES

18
Q

conclusion on prosociality

A

kids with prosocial stimuli in their family (more often than not not in poor) = higher prosocial skills = more trusting of others
- does this mean they stay poor?