Priming effects in judgements and behaviour - research Flashcards
Ma and Cao (2017)
travel attitudes moderate the influences of perceptions on travel behaviour
Kahn et al. (2019)
moral efficacy negatively mediates perceptions of organisational politics on organisational citizenship behaviour
Haynes et al. (2017)
perception of being overweight led to increased likelihood of attempting weight loss
not reliably associated with PA or healthy eating
more likely to report attempting weight loss but actually gain weight
suggests not all perceptions lead to the correct behaviours
Pappas et al. (2016)
cognitive and affective perceptions explain high intention to purchase
The findings support the need for online shopping environments to be more interactive in order to target customers’ cognitive and affective perceptions, and increase their intention to purchase.
Dijksterhuis and Bargh (2001)
perception essential to comprehend the environment - this doesn’t mean it is an end in itself
perception provides an understanding of the world
social perception generally has a direct effect on social behaviour
perceptual inputs are translated to behavioural outputs
Brewer et al. (2007)
consistent relationships between risk perceptions and behaviour - e.g. likelihood of vaccination
Pretegiani et al. (2019)
increased basal ganglia inhibitory output to the intermediate layer of the superior colliculus disrupted the normal coupling of perception and action
couples through the modulation of attention - suggests attention is necessary
Hommel (2019)
Theory of Event Coding (TEC) - claims perception and action are identical processes
McNeill et al. (2019)
Motor Simulation and Performance Model
Simulating (MS) and imagining (MI) an action leads to better performance - same activation in the brain
Lebon et al. (2018)
MI has overlap with the processes involved in the actual movement
excitability increased in the muscle during the real and imagined movement
inhibition occurred in preparation for the real and imagined movement
Monier et al. (2019)
synchronised action during learning (of a rhythmic interval in children) benefitted performance
especially for the younger children
Mathias et al. (2019)
pianists hearing a note soon to be played
interference from perception of near future information negatively affected performance more than far-future information
Bos et al. (2016)
imitation of facial expressions is an automatic process but is modulated by contextual information
imitation may depend on the behaviour being displayed during imitation - e.g. child more likely to imitate angry expressions if displaying negative behaviour
Jones (2012)
inherit neural mechanism to imitate
no imitation before the age of 2 - demonstrated developmental progression
imitation is a complex system
Unnerstall (2019)
primes ability to impact implicit associations - not consistent across studies
didn’t influence behaviour
reward was driver for how they behaved
Willard et al. (2016)
A recent meta-analysis found religious priming only effects religious believers.
Meta-analytic results found religious priming reliably increases prosocial behavior.
More work is needed to evaluate the robustness of these effects across contexts.
Shariff et al. (2015)
reliability of religious priming questioned
robust effects across a variety of outcome measures
doesn’t affect non-religious - relies on culturally transmitted beliefs
O’Carroll et al. (2019)
Methods Four hundred twenty participants (223 females) from England and Scotland aged 18+ who were not currently registered organ donors were randomized by block allocation using a 1:1 ratio to receive either a reciprocity prime or control message. After manipulation, they were asked to indicate their organ donation intentions and whether or not they would like to be taken to an organ donation registration and information page.
Results In line with our previous work, participants primed with a reciprocity statement reported greater intent to register as an organ donor than controls (using a 7-point Likert scale where higher scores = greater intention; prime mean [SD] = 4.3 [1.6] vs. control mean [SD] = 3.7 [1.4], p <= .001, d = 0.4 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.59]). There was again however, no effect on behavior as rates of participants agreeing to receive the donation register web-link were comparable between those primed at 11% (n = 23/210) (95% CI = 7.4-16.0) and controls at 12% (n = 25/210) (95% CI = 8.1-17.1), X-2 (1) = 0.09, p = .759.
Conclusions Reciprocal altruism appears useful for increasing intention towards joining the organ donation register. It does not, however, appear to increase organ donor behavior.
Zawadzka et al. (2019)
effects of materialistic social models on materialistic life aspirations
activation increased importance placed on financial success and image
didn’t affect non-materialistic
Shimoni et al. (2019)
Distinct positive emotions signal adherence to specific goals: pride signals the successful pursuit of long-term goals, while joy signals the successful pursuit of immediate desires. We propose that when children are primed with a positive emotion, without actually feeling it, they are likely to pursue the goal that evokes it. Because delaying gratification involves resisting an immediate desire for the sake of a long-term goal, we predicted that, when primed with pride, children would delay gratification more often than when primed with joy. We tested 8-year-olds’ ability to delay gratification, using a delay-discounting task. We primed pride/joy by having children either imagine a future emotional event (Experiment 1) or listen to another child’s emotional experience (Experiment 2). As predicted, pride-primed children showed lower delay discounting than children who were primed with joy and the control condition, demonstrating enhanced self-regulation. These results suggest that, from a young age, simply thinking about an emotion without actually experiencing it may cue pursuit of associated goals.
Orghian et al. (2018)
Spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) occur when people infer, without intention or awareness, personality traits from other people’s behaviors. Spontaneous trait transferences (STTs) occur when the trait inferred from the behavior of an actor is erroneously transferred to a person who is not the actor of the behavior. Here, we show that STIs and STTs are similar in the activation of the trait from the behavior and they differ in the link that is established between the inferred trait and the person, with stronger link being created in the STIs than in STTs.
Shimizu (2000)
The present study examined whether 3- to 6-year-old children understand trait-motive-behavior causality, and whether they know that traits cause behaviors over situations. Children listened to stories each of which included a motive, behavior, and an outcome. They then labeled the main character’s chief trait, and predicted the character’s behavior in a different context. The results showed that 3- and 4-year-olds understood trait-motive-behavior causality, but their understanding was not as complete as that of 5-and 6-year-olds. Children over the age of 5 understood that traits cause behaviors over situations, but only the fi-year-olds in the present study understood this completely. It was also suggested that a recency effect was observed in these young children’s trait inference.
Dijksterhuis et al. (2001)
Factors influencing the tendency to represent a social stimulus primarily in stereotypic terms, or more as a distinct exemplar, were predicted to moderate automatic behavior effects, producing assimilation and contrast respectively. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that when an impression pertained to a group of elderly people it led to behavioral assimilation to the stereotype (i.e., slower response latencies) and to contrast when identical information pertained to an individual exemplar. In Experiment 2, an impression of a single individual led to behavioral contrast under normal circumstances but to behavioral assimilation under cognitive load. Experiment 3 demonstrated that while a group impression led to assimilation under normal conditions, this effect was eliminated under conditions of accuracy motivation. Conditions that fostered assimilation were characterized by more stereotypical impressions of the stimulus target(s) compared to conditions that fostered contrast. Implications for automatic behavior are discussed.
Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998)
The authors tested and confirmed the hypothesis that priming a stereotype or trait leads to complex
overt behavior in line with this activated stereotype or trait. Specifically, 4 experiments established
that priming the stereotype of professors or the trait intelligent enhanced participants’ performance
on a scale measuring general knowledge. Also, priming the stereotype of soccer hooligans or the
trait stupid reduced participants’ performance on a general knowledge scale. Results of the experiments revealed (a) that prolonged priming leads to more pronounced behavioral effects and (b) that
there is no sign of decay of the effects for at least 15 min. The authors explain their results by
claiming that perception has a direct and pervasive impact on overt behavior (cf. J. A. Bargh, M.
Chen, & L. Burrows, 1996). Implications for human social behavior are discussed.