Property Law - Knowing Receipt and Dishonest Assistance Flashcards
(208 cards)
What two cases suggest UE can run concurrently with KR claim?
Dubai Aluminium v Salaam; Re Esteem Settlement
Why would a UE claim be preferable for C if allowed concurrently with KR?
No need to prove fault
What case applied unconscionability and thus affirmed BCCI v Akindele?
Charter v City Index
Belmont Finance v Williams Furniture (No.2)
All on Baden scale counts, and dishonest not necessary
What are the two core duties of KR?
Core restorative duty immediately, or liable to account if dealt with property inconsistently
Farah v Say-Dee is from what jurisdiction and court?
High Court of Australia
In what case did Lord Hoffmann clarify Twinsectra?
Barlow Clowes v Eurotrust
What are the three types of constructive trustees?
Trustees de son tort, knowing recipients and dishonest assistants
What case stated D may have to account for both new property exchanged for misdirected property and any profits generated therefrom under KR
Grimaldi v Chalemeon Mining
Who explores the two remedial duties of KR?
Mitchell and Watterson
C had concurrent claims in UE and KR
Relfo Ltd v Varsani
Twinsectra v Yardley judgment
HoL, Lord Hutton accepted objective limb from Brunei but for subjective stated D needs to realise he is not acting as honest person
McCullough v Marsden general
Subrogation
What two cases suggested SC need to approve for UE to run concurrently with KR?
BCCI v Akindele; Farah v Say-Dee
Re Montagu’s Settlement general
Duke of Manchester, life interest but T gave him all and sold
Dubai Aluminium v Salaam
UK suggested UE can run concurrently with KR in obiter
Grimaldi v Chalemeon Mining
D may have to account for both new property exchanged for misdirected property and any profits generated therefrom
Who found Barnes v Addy and Baden, Delvaux led to ‘tortuous convulsions’ for DA?
Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei v Tan
Ultraframe v Fielding on mental element of DA
D needs to have known T was not ‘entitled to do what he is doing’ for mental element of DA
What case states that as long as D took reasonable steps to preserve property, but lost/stolen/damaged before returned, no restorative duty for KR?
Evans v European Bank Ltd
Novoship (UK) v Nikitin suggests what
Suggests DAs liability can sometimes be primary as well
No change of position defence if D still in possession of asset purchased by benefit, to the extent that she is enriched by possession
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale
What are the last two stages of knowledge in Baden, Delvaux v Societe Generale known as?
Constructive knowledge
B only has to show assistance made breach easier for DA causation
Grupo Torras v Al-Sabah (No.5)