Prosocial behaviour Flashcards

1
Q

What is prosocial behaviour?

A

Actions intended to benefit others (e.g., helping, sharing, donating).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is morality?

A

Morality encompasses principles of right and wrong that guide behavior, often shaped by culture, upbringing, and evolutionary factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Altruism

A

A type of prosocial behavior that benefits others without regard to the consequences for oneself. Altruistic acts arise from feelings of sympathy and compassion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Motives for altruism (Daniel Batson)

A

Two selfish reasons: social reward and personal distress. The third one os more oriented towards pure altruism - empathetic concern for others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social reward

A

Being esteemed and valued by others in the form of praise, an award, or recognition. These can be so powerful that they trigger “competitive altruism”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Competitive altruism

A

People try to outdo one another in their altruistic acts, in order to be the most highly esteemed person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pure (True) Altruism

A

Helping others with no expectation of personal gain.

Driven purely by empathy and compassion.

Example: Running into danger to save a stranger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Moral (Normative) Altruism

A

Helping others because of moral beliefs or societal expectations.

Rooted in culture, religion, and ethics.

Example: Donating to charity because it’s seen as the “right thing to do.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Personal distress

A

People are motivated to help people in need in order to reduce their own distress. This tendency to feel personal distress when encountering someone else suffering appears to begin very early in life, when we are infants.

the pain regions in our brain are activated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Empathetic concern

A

The feeling people experience when identifying with someone in need, accompanied by the intention to enhance the other person’s welfare. This produces selfless altruism.

we volunteer to help others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the evolutionary theories of altruism?

A
  1. Kin Selection Theory (Hamilton, 1964)
  2. Reciprocal Altruism (Trivers, 1971)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kin Selection Theory (Hamilton, 1964)

A

We are more likely to help those who share our genes (e.g., immediate family).
* An evolutionary strategy that favors behaviors that increase the chance of survival of genetic relatives. From this perspective, people should be more likely to help those who share more of their genes, for example siblings over first cousins. By helping relatives survive, people help their own genetic material pass to future generations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reciprocal Altruism (Trivers, 1971)

A

Helping others increases the likelihood of being helped in return.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moral Dumbfounding

A

When people strongly believe something is morally wrong but struggle to justify why with logical reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgement (Jonathan Haidt)

A

Our moral judgements are the product of fast, emotional intuitions, which then influence how we reason about the issue in question. We feel before we think, then we find ways to justify our gut instinct.

e.g., the gut feeling that incest is wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moral Foundations Theory (Haidt)

A

Our moral judgements are shaped by deep intuitions within five “foundations” or domains. These act as a universal blueprint for morality, influenced by the social, economic and religious aspects of each culture. These automatic intuitions are based on specific emotions that guide reasoning, leading to distinct social judgements.

17
Q

What are the domains of the Moral Foundations Theory?

A
  1. Care/Harm
  2. Fairness/Reciprocity
  3. Ingroup loyalty
  4. Authority/Respect
  5. Purity/Sanctity
18
Q

Care/Harm Domain

A

Centers around a concern for the suffering of others, especially vulnerable individuals. The moral intuitions are triggered by signs of vulnerability and pain, and they elicit emotions such as sympathy that orient us toward protecting the welfare of others, often at personal cost.

most common kinf od everyday morality
Compassion, protecting others.

19
Q

Fairness/Reciprocity Domain

A

This foundaiton focuses on concerns that others act in a just, equitable fashion, and it is triggered by unfair acts (scamming, deceiving, failing to reciprocate a generous act, or taking more than one deserves). Anger is the quintessential emotion associated with violations of fairness because it fuels our passion for justice.

In one early test of moral foundations theory, Wilhelm Hofmann and colleagues pinged 1,252 adults on their smartphones

Justice, equality.

20
Q

Ingroup Loyalty

A

Ingroup loyalty pertains to the commitments we make to those in the groups we belong to. It’s the foundation for strong, cohesive social collectives, and it evokes emotions such as group pride (loyalty) or rage (betrayal).

Group identity, patriotism.

21
Q

Authority/Respect

A

Authority/respect is related to honoring one’s place in social hierarchies. Our intuitions about authority and respect are expressed in our experience of emotions such as embarrassment, shame, envy, and pride.

Respect for traditions.

22
Q

Purity/Sanctity

A

Purity/Sanctity centers on avoiding dangerous diseases and contaminants and socially impure ideas or actions. Disgust is the emotion most closely associated with such intuitions.

the most studied foundation
avoiding contamination, wanting to be pure

23
Q

Bystander effect

A

Situation in which a witness or bystander does not volunteer to help a victim or person in distress, expecting someone else to do it.

24
Q

Bystander intervention

A

The phenomenon whereby people intervene to help others in need even if the other is a complete stranger and the intervention puts the helper at risk

25
Diffusion of responsability
When deciding whether to help a person in need, knowing that there are others who could also provide assistance relieves bystanders of some measure of personal responsibility, reducing the likelihood that bystanders will intervene. | everyone feels less responsible to help out the more people there are
26
Pluralistic ignorance
Relying on the actions of others to define an ambiguous need situation and to then erroneously conclude that no help or intervention is necessary
27
Prisoner’s Dilemma
A scenario where two individuals must choose between cooperation or betrayal, with personal and collective consequences. Setup: Two prisoners are arrested and can either: Cooperate (stay silent) → Lighter punishment for both. Defect (betray the other) → One goes free, the other gets a heavy sentence (if only one betrays). Both betray → Both get moderate punishment.
28
Tit-for-tat strategy
A strategy in the prisoner's dillema game in which the player's first move is to cooperate, thereafter, the player mimics the other person's behaviour, whether cooperative or competitive. The strategy fares well when used against other strategies.
29
Volunteerism
When people help without any expectation of compensation. Often driven by empathetic concern, although other reasons also exist (desire for social rewards and reducing personal distress.)
30
Politics and the Haidt's foundations
Liberals have been found to prefer the foudnation of care/harm and fairness/reciprocity, whereas conservatives appear to have a broader framework that includes authority/respect, ingroup loyalty and purity/sanctity.
31
Empathy–Altruism Model (Batson, 2011)
Claims that people who put themselves in the shoes of a victim and imagining how the victim feel will experience empathic concern that evokes an altruistic motivation for helping. If we feel empathy, we help out of true altruism. If no empathy, we help only if it benefits us.
32
Arousal-Cost-Reward Model (Piliavin et al., 1981)
We help when the emotional cost of not helping is high and the cost of helping is low. Seeing a person in need leads to the arousal of unpleasant feelings, and observers are motivated to eliminate that aversive state, often by helping the victim.
33
Cost–Benefit Analysis
A decision-making process that compares the cost of an action or thing against the expected benefit to help determine the best course of action
34
Social Exchange Theory (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959)
Helping is a calculated decision based on rewards vs. costs.
35
Effective Altruism
Effective altruism is a philosophy and social movement that applies evidence and reason to maximize the impact of charitable actions, ensuring that resources do the most good