Psychopathology Flashcards
(100 cards)
what are the four definitions of abnormality?
-statistical infrequency ( SI )
-deviation from social norms ( DSN )
-failure to function adequately ( FTFA )
-deviation from ideal mental health ( DIMH )
what is the SI definition of abnormality?
-a behaviour is abnormal if its frequency is more than two standard deviations away from the mean incidence rates represented on a normally-distributed bell curve, i.e. a relatively rare / unusual characteristic
-this defines it in terms of the number of times it is observed
what is an example of defining abnormality in terms of SI?
-IQ is normally distributed, with 68% of people scoring between 85 and 115, and only 2% below 70, so those scoring below 70 are statistically abnormal and can be diagnosed with intellectual disability disorder ( IDD )
evaluate SI as a definition of abnormality
-one strength is real-world application
-one limitation is that unusual characteristics can be positive
-another limitation is that not everyone will benefit from being classed as abnormal
why is it a strength that the SI definition has real-world application?
-E = it is useful in diagnosis, e.g. IDD because this requires an IQ in the bottom 2%, as well as in assessing a range of conditions, e.g. the Beck depression inventory ( BDI ) assesses depression and only 5% of people score 30+, indicating severe depression
-E = this means that SI is useful in diagnostic and assessment procedures, demonstrating its practical value
why is it a limitation that unusual characteristics can be positive?
-E = if very few people display a characteristic, then the behaviour is statistically infrequent but it doesn’t necessarily make someone abnormal, e.g. IQ scores above 130 are just as unusual as those below 70 but not regarded as undesirable or needing treatment
-E = this means that, although SI can be part of defining abnormality, it can never be sufficient as its sole basis
why is it a limitation that not everyone will benefit from being classed as abnormal using the SI definition?
-E = when someone is living a happy and fulfilled life, there is no benefit to them being labelled as abnormal since the label of abnormality ( e.g. IDD ) might carry a social stigma
-E = this means that labelling someone as abnormal just because they are statistically unusual is likely to do more harm than good
what is the DSN definition of abnormality?
-a behaviour is abnormal if it’s different from the accepted standards ( social norms ) specific to a certain culture, which is a collective judgement about what is right
-there are both culturally-specific and general norms ( applicable to the majority of cultures ), so this definition is related to cultural context
what is an example of defining abnormality in terms of DSN?
-a person would be diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder ( APD ) if they behave aggressively towards strangers ( thus breaching a general social norm ) and if they experience hallucinations ( which also breaches the social norms of multiple cultures, but some cultures may encourage this as a sign of spirituality )
evaluate DSN as a definition of abnormality
-one strength is real-world application
-one limitation is that social norms are situationally and culturally relative
-another limitation is the risk of unfair labelling and human rights abuse
why is it a strength that the DSN definition has real-world application?
-E = it is useful in diagnosis, e.g. APD because this requires a failure to conform to ethical standards, as well as schizotypal PD which involves ‘strange’ beliefs and behaviours
-E = this means that DSN is useful in psychiatric diagnosis, demonstrating its practical value
why is it a limitation that social norms are situationally and culturally relative?
-E = a person from one culture may label someone from another culture as abnormal using their standards rather than the person’s standards, e.g. hearing voices is socially acceptable in some cultures ( as messages from ancestors ) but would be seen as a sign of abnormality in the UK
-E = this means that it is difficult to judge DSN across different contexts
why is it a limitation that using the DSN definition risks unfair labelling and human rights abuse?
-E = reliance on DSN to understand abnormality can lead to abuse of human rights, e.g. historically, diagnoses like drapetomania ( black slaves running away ) have been used to control slaves and avoid debate, but we need to be able to use DSN to diagnose conditions such as APD
-E = this suggests that, overall, the use of DSN to define abnormality may do more harm than good due to the potential for abuse
what is the FTFA definition of abnormality?
-Rosenhan and Seligman ( 1989 ) suggested that a person is abnormal if their current mental state is preventing them from being able to cope with the demands of everyday life, e.g. if they aren’t able to maintain basic standards of nutrition and hygiene, relationships and a job
-this occurs when they no longer conform to interpersonal rules ( e.g. maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space ), experience severe personal distress and behave in a way that is irrational or dangerous
what is an example of defining abnormality in terms of FTFA?
-having a very low IQ is a statistical infrequency but an individual would also need to be failing to function adequately to be diagnosed with IDD
evaluate FTFA as a definition of abnormality
-one strength is that it represents a sensible threshold for professional help
-one limitation is that it can lead to discrimination / social control
-another limitation is that FTF can be normal
why is it a strength that the FTFA definition represents a sensible threshold for professional help?
-E = according to the mental health charity Mind, around 25% of people in the UK will experience symptoms of mental disorder to some degree in any given year, but when we cease to function adequately, people seek or are referred for professional help
-E = this means that the FTFA criterion provides a way to target treatment and services to those who need them the most
why is it a limitation that the FTFA definition can lead to discrimination / social control?
-E = it is hard to distinguish between FTF and a conscious decision to deviate from social norms, e.g. people may choose to live off-grid as part of an alternative lifestyle or take part in high-risk leisure activities
-E = this means that people who make unusual choices are at risk of being labelled as abnormal and having their freedom of choice restricted
why is it a limitation that FTF can be normal?
-E = there are some circumstances in which most of us fail to cope for a time, e.g. bereavement / grief, so it is unfair to give someone a label for reacting normally to difficult circumstances, but some people may need professional help to adjust to circumstances like bereavement
-E = this means that it is hard to know when to base a judgement of abnormality on FTFA
what is the DIMH definition of abnormality?
-Jahoda ( 1958 ) suggested that a person is abnormal if they don’t meet a set of 8 criteria for good mental health, which includes being able to self-actualise ( fulfill one’s potential ), maintain motivation to carry out everyday tasks, not being distressed, having an accurate perception of self, displaying good self-esteem etc.
evaluate DIMH as a definition of abnormality
-one strength is that Jahoda’s criteria is highly comprehensive
-one limitation is that Jahoda’s criteria sets extremely high standards for IMH
-another limitation is that it may be culture-bound
why is it a strength that Jahoda’s criteria is highly comprehensive?
-E = her concept of IMH includes a range of criteria which covers most of the reasons why we might need help with MH, which means that an individual’s MH can be discussed meaningfully with various professionals ( e.g. psychiatrist or CBT therapist )
-E = therefore, IMH provides a checklist against which we can assess ourselves and others
why is it a limitation that Jahoda’s criteria sets extremely high standards for IDM?
-E = very few of us attain all of Jahoda’s criteria for IMH and even fewer of us are able to maintain them for long, so an impossible set of standards can be disheartening, but having such comprehensive criteria might be of value to someone wanting to understand and improve their MH
-E = this means that a set of highly comprehensive criteria for IMH isn’t equally helpful for everyone
why is it a limitation that the DIMH definition may be culture-bound?
-E = some of her criteria for IMH are limited to the US and Europe, e.g. self-actualisation isn’t recognised in much of the world and would probably be dismissed as self-indulgent, and even within Europe, there are variations in the value placed on personal independence ( e.g. high in Germany, low in Italy )
-E = this means that it is very difficult to apply the concept of IMH from one culture to another