psychopathology (Paper 1) Flashcards
(167 cards)
What is Statistical infrequency?
p. 134
Occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic, e.g being more depressed or less intelligent than most of the population.
A01
This is 5% on both extremes of the normal distribution curve
Statistical infrequency when it comes to IQ
p. 134
This statistical approach for intelligence - This characteristic can be reilably measured and you can see the normal distribution of IQ on page 134.
A01
We know that, in any human characteristic, the majority of people’s scores will cluster around the average, and that the further we go above or below that average, the fewer people will attain that score.
This is called the normal distribution.
Statistical infrequency when it comes to intellectual disability disorder
p. 134
- The average IQ is set at 100.
- Most people (68%) have an IQ in the range from 85 to 115.
- Only 2% of people have a score below 70.
Those individuals scoring below 70 are very unusual or ‘abnormal, and are liable to receive a diagnosis of a psychological disorder - intellectual disability disorder.
A01
What is normal distribution?
p. 134
We know that, in any human characteristic, the majority of people’s scores will cluster around the average, and that the further we go above or below that average, the fewer people will attain that score.
This is called the normal distribution.
A01
What does it mean to deviate from social norms?
p. 134
(social deviation)
Behaviour that is different from the accepted standards within a community/society.
A01
What is deviation and why do we notice it?
p. 134
Groups of people who choose to define behaviour as abnormal on the basis that it offends their sense of what is ‘acceptable’ or the norm. We are making a collective judgement as a society about what is right.
A01
Example of norms specific to the culture we live in:
p. 134
Of course those social norms may be different for each generation and every culture, so there are relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal on the basis that they breach social norms. e.g, homosexuality continues to be viewed as abnormal (and illegal) in some cultures.
A01
For example in April 2019 Brunei introduced new laws that make sex between men an offence punishable by stoning to death.
What is anti-social personality disorder?
p. 134
- According to the DSM-5 (the manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental disorder) one important symptom of antisocial personality disorder is an ‘absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour’.
In other words we are making the social judgement that a psychopath is abnormal because they don’t conform to our moral standards. They tend to be impulsive, aggressive and irresponsible.
A01
Psychopathic behaviour would be considered abnormal in a very wide range of cultures.
Give a real-life example of a deviatior from social norms
p. 134
Antisocial personality disorder involves socially unacceptable behaviour.
A01
Positive evaluation
Statistical infrequency - Real life application
p. 135
Has a real-life application in the diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder.
There is therefore a place for statistical infrequency in thinking about what are normal and abnormal behaviours and characteristics.
All assessment of patients with mental disorders includes some kind of measurement of how severe their symptoms are as compared to statistical norms (as distinct from social norms). Statistical infrequency is thus a useful part of clinical assessment.
A03
limitation (negative evaluation)
Statistical infrequency - Unusual characteristic and it’s negative ideology for the need of treatment:
p. 135
Unusual characteristics can be positive,
1Q scores over 130 are just as unusual as those below 70, but we wouldn’t think of super-intelligence as an undesirable characteristic that needs treatment.
Just because very few people display certain behaviours does make the behaviour statistically abnormal but doesn’t mean it requires treatment to return to normal.
This is a serious limitation to the concept of statistical infrequency and why it would never be used alone to make a diagnosis.
A03
Evaluation - negative
Statistical infrequency - the negative effect of being ‘labelled’
p. 135
Not everyone unusual benefits from a label
Another problem with statistical infrequency is that, where someone is living a happy fulfilled life, there is no benefit to them being labelled as abnormal regardless of how unusual they are. So someone with a very low IQ but who was not distressed, quite capable of working, etc., would simply not need a diagnosis of intellectual disability.
If that person was ‘labelled’ as abnormal this might have a negative effect on the way others view them and the way they view themselves.
A03
Evaluation, negative
Limitations of Deviation from social norms Defining Abnormality
p. 135
what is a positive evaluation for Deviation from social norms Defining Abnormality?
Deviation from social norms is not the only factor to consider. The distress caused to others by antisocial behavior (p. 136) is also important. Therefore, deviation from social norms is never the sole factor in defining abnormality.
A03
It has a real-life application in the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder. There is therefore a place for deviation from social norms in thinking about what is normal and abnormal.
Negative evaluation
Deviation from social norms- Cultural relativism
p. 135
Using deviation from social norms to define abnormal behavior has its problems because social norms change over time and differ between cultures. E.g, someone from one culture might label another person as behaving abnormally based on their own cultural standards, not the other person’s.
A03
For instance, hearing voices is accepted in some cultures but seen as abnormal in the UK. This creates problems for people in one culture living within another cultural group.
negative evaluation
The reliance on deviation from social norms and its ethicallity
p. 135
Too much reliance on deviation from social norms to understand abnormality can lead to the systematic abuse of human rights. Looking at historical examples of deviation from social norms, it is pretty clear that these diagnoses were really just there to maintain control over minority ethnic groups and women.
A03
More radical psychologists suggest that some of our modern categories of mental disorder are really abuses of people’s rights to be different.
Extra evaluation - positive
The strengths of Deviation from Social Norms: Desirability of Behavior
p. 135
Why is this therefore a limitation from the Statistical infrequency approach?
A strength of the deviation from social norms approach - is that it includes the issue of the desirability of a behaviour. This means that social norms can be more useful than e.g statistical norms who dont take diserability into account.
E.g. Highly aggressive people are equally unusual as highly non-aggressive people. However, as aggression is low in social acceptability we tend to regard high levels of aggression (but not low levels) as abnormal. Here deviation from social norms works better than statistical infrequency because we are not simply looking at how unusual the behaviour is, but also at its social unacceptability.
A03
The statistical infrequency approach doesn’t take desirability into account. e.g, genius is statistically abnormal but they wouldn’t want to include that in the definition of abnormal behaviours, this rejects a great social norms factor.
Failure to function adequately definition:
p. 136
When someone is unable to cope with the ordinary demands of day-to-day living.
A01
We might decide that someone is not functioning adequately when they are unable to maintain basic standards of nutrition and hygiene, cannot hold down a job or maintain relationships with people around them.
Deviation from ideal mental health definition-
p. 136
When someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health.
A01
According to David Rosenhan and Martin Seligman, when might we decide someone is failing to function adequately?
p. 136
- When a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules, E.g, maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space.
- When a person experiences severe personal distress.
- When a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others.
A01
One of the criterias for diagnosing intellectual disability disorder is having a very low IQ (a statistical deviation). However, a diagnosis would not be made on this basis only - an individual must also be failing to function adequately before a diagnosis would be given.
What is Marie Jahoda’s checklist for what ideal mental health looks like?
p. 136
Marie Jahoda (1958) suggested that we are in good mental health if we meet the following criteria:
* Positive self-attitude
* Autonomy
* Self-actualisation
* Resistance to stress
* Accurate perception of reality
* Environmental mastery
A01
Inevitably there is some overlap between what we might call deviation from ideal mental health and what we might call failure to function adequately. So we can think of someone’s inability to keep a job as either a failure to cope with the pressures of work or as a deviation from the ideal of successfully working.
Application
Psychologists and their current classifications on abnormality
p. 136
Psychologists no longer classify abnormality based on just one definition:
Under the DSM-5, paraphilias (ppl who exhibit unusual sexual behaviours) (e.g., paedophilia -attraction to children, exhibitionism- flashing, and frotteurism - rubbing against people) are only classed as disorders if they cause harm or distress. Consensual behaviours like cross-dressing or sadomasochism, are not considered abnormal unless they interfere with daily functioning.
This shift from social norm-based definitions to more ethical, flexible criteria’s like failure to function adequately, recognise that abnormality is often context-dependent.
A02
E.g, homosexuality was once seen as abnormal for breaking social norms but is no longer considered a disorder as it does not cause others harm.
Evaluation - Positive
Failure to function adequately - Patients perspective
p. 137
A strength of ‘failure to function adequately’ is that it attempts to include the subjective experience of the individual.
It may not be an entirely satisfactory approach because it is difficult to assess distress,
but at least this definition acknowledges that the experience of the patient (and/or others) is important.
Therefore the ‘failure to function adequately’ definition captures the experience of many of the people who need help; and suggests that ‘failure to function adequately’ is a useful point of reference for assessing abnormality.
A03
Failure to function adequately - Evaluation ( - )
When is Deviating from Social Norms NOT Failing to Function Adequately?
p. 137
Distinguishing between someone failing to function and simply deviating from social norms can be difficult. E.g, a person without a job or permanent address might be seen as failing to function, but they may have chosen an alternative lifestyle. Similarly, extreme sports or supernatural beliefs might seem irrational or maladaptive to some, but are not necessarily signs of dysfunction.
If we label these behaviors as failures of adequate functioning, we risk limiting personal freedom and potentially discriminating against minority groups. It’s important to consider whether behaviour causes harm or involves non-consenting victims—this is a clearer indicator of genuine dysfunction.
A03
Evaluation - Negative
Failure to function adequately and its subjective judgements:
p. 137
When deciding whether someone is failing to function adequately, someone has to judge whether a patient is distressed or distressing.
Some patients may say they are distressed but may be judged as not suffering. There are methods for making such judgments as objective as possible, including checklists such as Global Assessment of Functioning Scale.
However, the principle remains that someone (e.g. a psychiatrist) has the right to make this judgement.
A03