Quiz 3 Flashcards
(222 cards)
Where do gut feelings come from?
1) fundamental, evolved motives (natural selection)
2) personal past (early experience)
3) recent past (carryover effect)
4) the present (contagion and context)
5) the future (active goals)
Jeff Simpson et al: attachment at age 1
Attachment at age 1 predicts:
Social ability in grade school
Number of friends in high school
How long their relationships last in their 20s
How the past affects our perception of in/out groups
Soak up the cultural values of people in our group and reject the values of those in an an out group
Ambady, Shih, et al: priming cultural identity
Priming Asian identity in Asian-American 5 year old girls increased their math performance on an age appropriate math test and priming female identity decreased their math performance
Weisbuch et al: steryotipic/racist non-verbal behaviour on TV
Found that on TV white actors viewed African American characters with equal roles as more negative based on non-verbal cues than they did their white counterparts with equal roles to the black characters
Correll et al: the police officers dilemma
Cultural biases became evident under time pressure. White participants shot black people more often when they were unarmed. Did not shoot armed white participants when they had a gun at a much higher rate
Gut feeling (definition):
Clear positive or negative feelings of which you do not know the source or reason
(Implicit learning based on last experience)
Kahneman & Klein: when should you trust your gut?
Experts intuition can be trusted when there is immediate feedback such as a fire fighter.
Stockbrokers or advertisers may be successful on a gut feeling but only when those ideas just happen to work out, it’s pure luck.
Zajonc: Mere exposure
Participants had a greater liking for old rather than new objects in the absence of the ability to discriminate from new at better than chance. Meaning that just having exposure to something leads us to have a positive association to it that implicitly influences our choices.
Implicit memory effect (definition):
Greater liking for previously presented stimuli, in the absence of conscious recognition
How does the mere exposure effect happen?
The more a stimuli is presented, the more easily it is processed the next time. Which builds up and sharpens your internal perceptual representation and leads to perceptual fluency.
Perceptual fluency (definition)
Easily recall information given a stimulus. It is an important meta-cognitive signal, that we use to ‘trust’ our perceptual experiences. Perceptual fluency increases with exposure.
Schwarz & Newman: Truthiness
Fluency can cause stereotypes to mislead us by automatically (fluently, effortlessly) providing information about an individual. It feels like it’s coming from ‘out there’ but it is actually a product of our minds
Even the font of the exact same directions influences our perception of the quality/truthiness of the directions
Fluency (definition)
How easily we can recognize stimuli. Evolved adaptive cue that can be fooled by modern developments such as fonts
Ex: advertisers use mere exposure effect of familiarity with the brand or product
Morewedge intuition studies
People trust their intuitions as if it were a supernatural message (voice of god). We also take our dreams as premonitions and thought content that comes unbidden and not from intentional thought is seen as God talking to you.
Geiselin: the creative process
Answers often come to famous artists and scientists during a dream or while shaving or something while they are not consciously thinking about the problem. This only occurs after a lot of conscious thought has been given to the problem in the first place.
Descartes: dualism
Conscious thought is distinguished from mechanical, physical, bodily reactions. Conscious thought is considered god-like and unconscious thought is your animal nature.
Morewedge intuition study on Descartes and Searle
Conscious thought is original, as in I am the source whereas unconscious though comes from somewhere else that isn’t me.
What are some other things that can fool our modern mind
Photographs or thin slices can trick us because they activate stereotypes because of the fluency with which those stereotypes are activated. Ex: grumpy old man turns out to be nice
Olivola & Todorov: are faces diagnostic?
Faces are not diagnostic of the traits we immediately perceive in a person
Ambady & Rosenthal: Thin slices
People can predict with good accuracy many social and clinical outcomes just from a brief 30 second exposure to expressive behaviours. Having more time didn’t change the accuracy
Ex: teacher effectiveness, therapist effectiveness, depression in patients
Susan Andersen: transference
Morphed photo of a random person with a loved one led to an increased liking of the new person because the recognizable features of the loved one in the novel person contributed to our perception of them.
How can we improve our judgements based on intuition
Check if the context matches the evolutionary conditions
Take our intuitions seriously but not as the only basis for a decision
Remove carryover effects by sleeping on it
Think about who the decision will affect
The beauty premium: real life consequences of attractiveness
More women and men were called back for an interview if they were perceived as more attractive given the same resume than people that were perceived as unattractive. You were better off not sending a photo at all than being unattractive.