Reductionism and Holism - 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Reductionist

A

the practice of reductionism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reductionism

A
  1. Reductionism is the theory of describing something using its basic parts or the simplest explanation and reasoning
  2. It is based on the belief that any human behaviour or cognitive process is explained best when looking at the parts that make up that behaviour or process to understand how it works.
  3. Scientists often reduce complex behaviour into basic parts because it means that we can be more certain that one thing causes another which can investigate what causes a behaviour
  4. A theory or study that describes a behaviour by a single, simple explanation is said to be reductionist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reductionism - scientific methods

A

associated with laboratory experiments where factors that may explain a behaviour can be isolated and tested under controlled conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strengths of reductionism

A
  1. it is desirable scientific practice and can be appropriate in circumstances where there is a clear, single explanation
  2. It is easy to conduct and make a conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Weaknesses of reductionism

A
  1. May result in an explanation that is overly simplistic and may ignore other causes of that behaviour
  2. Does not take under-consideration the interaction of different factors that can result in an effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Holistic

A

the practice of holism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

holism

A
  1. Holism can be described as the theory of trying to understand the whole behaviour rather than its parts.
  2. When something is considered holistic, one is trying to understand the topic as a whole.
  3. This approach takes into account the fact that many different factors together can cause a behaviour, and therefore dividing up these factors is not useful in understanding the behaviour as a whole.
  4. the theory of explaining something as a whole
  5. opposite of reductionism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Holism - scientific methods

A

Holistic approaches tend to use qualitative methods to gain greater insight into the causes of behaviour and try to understand the whole person and their beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strengths of Holism

A

This shows that holistic explanations provide a more complete and global understanding of behaviour than reductionist approaches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Weaknesses of Holism

A
  1. It is difficult to make a conclusion because in order to understand the whole individual, every variable must be investigated and understood and used at the same time.
  2. This also makes it time-consuming
  3. It is also unscientific because the findings can only apply to a particular individual- the resulting theories cannot apply to everyone else.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reductionism applying to human memory research

A
  1. The area of cognitive psychology concerned with memory and other cognitive processes are regarded to be reductionist
  2. MSMM is reductionist as it describes our memory as a series of component memory stores with specific functions such as rehearsal. However the research used is reductionist as experiments tend to isolate variables to investigate without considering other factors that can also affect the behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Holism applying to human memory research

A
  1. Bartlett’s work is considered holistic because of the way he conducted his research.
  2. He used qualitative analysis to explore the reconstructive nature of memory as he understood how each person’s schemas affected recall of stories.
  3. He researched the character and background of the participants in his sample for him to understand how their schemas were formed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly