relationships Flashcards

1
Q

which gender place a particular importance on physical attractiveness

A

males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why is physical attractiveness important to men

A

important cue to a womens health and hence her fertility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

in what way is physical attractiveness important for women

A

short term mating eg one night stands
long term mating other factors take precedence such as resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who created the matching hypothesis

A

walster and walster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does the matching hypothesis propose

A

when initiating romantic relationships individuals seek partners whose social desirability equals their own eg physical attractiveness, social standing and intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what has to happen for matching hypothesis

A

individuals assess their own value and then select the best available candidate who is most likely to be attracted to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does opting for a partner with similar social desirability do

A

maximises the chance of a successful outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what’s the matching hypothesis primarily associated with

A

attractiveness alone mating choices are “realistic” to increase chances affections will be reciprocated.
-Individual considers their own ideal choice with choice of other person and the avaliablitlty of alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evaluate physical attractiveness

A

-key study walster 4 accomplices rated each of them for physical attractiveness participants completed questionnaire to assess personality told matched w/ ideal partner but random 6 months later found more positive to someone more attractive other factors didn’t affect liking the dates
+research support meltzer husbands relationship satisfaction was positively related to objective ratings of their wives attractiveness TMB wives satisfaction wasn’t correlated with husbands attractiveness
-complex matching sprecher and hatfield a person may compensate for lack of physical attractiveness with other desirable qualities such as charming personality kindness status TMB people are able to attract partners more physically attractive than them because they offer other aspects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is sexual selection

A

explains the evolution of characteristics such as physical attractiveness, intelligence that confer a reproductive advantage as opposed to a survival advantage therefore the ability to leave descendants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

intrasexual selection

A

when males must outcompete other members of their sex in order to gain access to the other sex eg deer rutting
-vicotrs are able to mate so pass on their genes
-whatever characteristic lead to success eg greater strength, strong antlers becomes more widespread in gene pool and traits will be passed on by victor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

intersexual selection

A

members of one sex choosing partners with specific qualities.
-memebers of the opposite sex who possess these qualities eg attractiveness, status and resources will gain mating advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

example of intersexual selection

A

if all females chose tall males then the number of small males would decrease. The successful traits (gene to tallness) will be passed on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

long term mating

A

as both sexes invest heavily long term mating involves high levels of choosiness as the genetic quality of offspring is half of their mate
-men are attracted to fertile and attractive women to ensure reproductive success
-women are attracted to men with resources to ensure protection whilst they care for the child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evaluate evolutionary explanations for partner preferences

A

+supporting evidence Buss actual marriages in 10,000 participants 37 cultures ranked 18 characteristics such as physical attractiveness and good financial support on a 4 point scale found that resources more important for women physical attractiveness more to men youth to men and intelligence both
-cultural differences kasha and Sharma found women valued potential mates access to resources far more in cultures where womens status and educational opportunities were sharply limited TMB suggests role of social/economic forces are as important as evolutionary in establishing mate preferences patterns
-lack of generaliability Buller found female mate preferences of most studies done on female undergraduate expect to show a preference for men with similar interests education and prospects of their own TMB evidence that universal mating preferences for high-status men is weak or non-existent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

definition of self disclosure

A

-the extent to which a person reveals personal information about themselves their intimate thoughts, feelings and experiences to another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

why is self disclosure important

A

important process to development o romantic relationships greater disclosure leads to greater feelings of intimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

distinguish given and receiven self disclosure

A

given = disclosing ones own personal thoughts feelings and experiences
recieved = information disclosed by the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

research on self disclosure

A

-recieved self disclosure is a batter predicator of liking and loving than the level of self disclosure given
-disclosure of more intimate info such as past sexual relationships has greater influence on relationship satisfaction than more neutral eg taste in music and food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

norms of self disclosure

A

-early stages of relationship only moderate level of self disclosure
-this should be neither so personal so disclosure appears indiscriminate in they trust nor so impersonal so the listener doesn’t get to know the disclosure better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

who developed filter theory

A

kerckhoff and davis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

evaluate self disclose

A

-ignore other factors such as physical attractiveness
+research support meta analysis by collins and miller people who engaged in intimate disclosure liked more liking was stronger if a recipient believed disclosure was only to them than shared indiscrmately TMB plays role in development and maintenance of somatic relationships
+key study sprecher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

definition of filter theory

A

we choose romantic partners by a series of filters that narrow down field of avaliables from what we make our choice different filters are prominent at different stages of partner selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

different stages and filters

A

early stages =demographic details (class, region, where they live ).
development = similarity of attitudes determines in relationship continues
finally = compatibility eg do their traits complement the individuals traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
social demography
variables such as age, social background and geographical location -determine likelihood of meeting someone -more likely to come into contact with people of our own ethic, social and educational background -feel at ease due to similarity
25
similarity of attitude
such as attitude and value marriage kids debates determine if a relationship becomes stable
26
complementary of needs
people have different needs eg the need to be cared for and the need of caring -provide each other with mutual satisfaction of opposing needs -eg poor women might look for wealthy man
27
winch
social needs should be complementary than similar if marriages are to work
27
evaluate filter theory
+supporting study eg kerckhoff and davis longitudinal study 94 dating couples in US questionnaire using index of consensus test similarity in attitudes and FIRO for complimentary needs found that STM (>18 months) similarity most important for LTM (<18 months) complimentary most important -contradictory study eg levinger 330 couples no evidence that either similarity in attitude or complementary in needs influenced permanence TMB not replicable and relied on self report +real value of filtering eg duck filtering important to avoid investing in relationships that wont work decide early before they become too deeply involved TMB stop people making wrong choices and. having to live with consequence.
28
profit and loss social exchange theory
everyone tries to maximise the rewards(cared for and sex) they obtain from a relationship and minimise the costs we hope expect that rewards exceed costs (effort time wasted) -succesul relationships give and take in equal proportion
29
equation for outcome
rewards - costs = outcome (profit or loss) and commitment to a relationship depends on its profitability
30
definition of comparison levels
-a standard against which all our relationships are judged a product of experiences in other relationships and general view what we might expect from a relationship
31
comparison level for alternatives
-individual will be committed to their current when the overall costs and benefits are percieved as being greater than what might be possible in a alternative relationship
32
evaluate social exchange theory
+supporting study sprecher longitudinal study on 101showed that CLA was high commitment to and satisfaction with current relationship tended to be low TMB those who lack alternatives likely to remain committed to their relationship and those committed devalue alternatives +key study kurdek and schmitt 185 couples (44 straight marriage, 35 straight couples-habiting and 50 same sex male, 56 same sex female) found that in each type of relationship satisfaction was associated with benefits of current relationship and alternatives less attractive. TMB same factors for all relationships -ignores investment model
33
equity theory
maximise rewards and minimise costs incorporating fairness and equity people are most comfortable when they perceive they are getting roughly what they deserve from a relationship
34
what is an equitable relationship
one partners benefits minus the costs equals there partners benefits minus their costs
35
inequitable relationships
-dissatisfaction being over benefited (receiving more than you give) leads to guilt and shame being under benefitted (receiving less than u give may result in anger and resentment
36
stages of relationship and equity theory
early stages = more concerned with fairness, reward and equity deeply committed = couples become less focused on day-to-day rewards happily married couples tend not to keep a score of how much they are giving and getting
37
evaluate equity theory
+supporting study Stafford and canary 200 married couples asked questions about satisfaction and maintenance strategies such as reassurance. satisfaction highest in equitable relationship and more likely to engage in behaviours that contributed to spouses happiness -indiviudal differences eh huseman identified 'benevolents' who are givers therefore more tolerant of under rewarded and 'entitleds' who prefer being over rewarded therefore entitled to receive benefits TMBdifferent sensitivity to inequality -gender differences eg demaris women more sensitive to injustices and perceive themselves as under benefited and more disturbed by this TMB women more likely to be vigilant and react negatively to being exploited
38
who created the investment model of relationships
rusbult
39
investment model
relationships persist because of bonds that tie them (their investments) and the absence of better alternatives
40
what are the 3 concepts that influence commitment
satisfaction, quality of alternatives and investments
41
satisfaction level
refers to the positive and negative emotions experienced in a relationship and the extent to which the other person fulfils the individuals most important needs
42
quality of alternatives
the extent to which an individual most important needs might be met outside their current relationship -if perceived another relationship will produce better outcomes or not being in a relationship may be seen as preferable
43
investment size
-influences stability of a relationship -a measure of resources such as children, time ,friendship and house and pets -investments create connections and can be a powerful inducement to remain in a relationship
44
commitment
refers to the likelihood that a relationship will persist -commitment is high in a relationship with high satisfaction and quality of alternatives is low or investment is high
45
evaluate invest model
+supporting study le and agnew meta analysis 52 studies 11000 pp’s 54% male 46% female found that correlation between satisfaction level and commitment 0.68 was found to be more significant than quality of alternatives -0.48 and investment size 0.46 and stay and leave behaviour at 0.47 TMB individuals showing higher level of commitment more likely to stay -problem in assessing the variables such as measuring commitment what factors leading to it eg resbult developed "investment model scale" TMB although found high in reliability and validity relies on self report techniques +real life application to explaining abusive relationships low satisfaction but may lack alternatives or have too many investments TMB resbult + martz found alternatives and investments predicted weather abused women remained committed or returned to partner
46
who created a phase model of relationship breakdown
rollie and duck
47
first stage of relationship breakdown
when one partner becomes dissatisfied and distressed maybe due to inequity
48
intrapsychic process
within the mind where an individual may brood on the issues and consider weather they would be better off out of the relationship they won't say anything to partner at this stage
49
dyadic process
two way discussion confronting their partner to discuss concerns -some couples have forces that bind them together such as children so their relationship can be saved if both parties are motivated to avoid break up
50
social phase
involves beginning to share dissatisfaction with their network of friends and family others begin to take sides and share opinion which may speed breakdown process
51
grave dressing
each party will try to present themselves as trustworthy and loyal and may reinterpret their view of their partner initially exciting but now irresponsible
52
stages of relationship breakdown beginning to last
-initially dissatisfaction -intrapsychic phase -dyadic phase -social phase -grave dressing
53
evaluate relationship breakdown
+benefits of relationship breakdown eg Tashiro and Frazier found individuals are able to feel better about ending a relationship when they focus on the situation and not their own personal flaws TMB play down break down to not threaten their psychological well being -ethical issues pp's in a vulnerable position distress from revisiting issues that led to breakdown and privacy intense personal nature individuals are attempting to cope with intense emotional distress TMB researchers need to consider if interests are worth exploring -fails to acknowledge possibility of personal growth eg Rollie and duck new resurrection phase 's a period of personal growth and self-reflection, aiming to turn past relationship experiences into a source of strength and wisdom. TMB not just distress
54
what is a gate
a obstacle that could interfere with the development of a relationship
55
self disclosure in virtual relationships
known as broadcasting involves presenting an edited version of the self to others high self disclosure links to anonymity and disapproval levels are decreased when disclosing online
56
absence of gating
in face to face personal factors such as physical apprence , mannerisms determine development of relationship. in real life we use available features such as attractiveness, age or ethnicity to categories potential partners in virtual no gate so advantage shy less attractive or less socially skilled people
57
how does anonymity affect virtial relationships
persons true self less active barriers to interaction are not initially evident so less likely to stop potentially relationships developing
58
evaluate virtual relationships
+Evidence has been found for the importance of the internet for romantic relationships. Rosenfield and Thomas (2012) found, in a study of 4000 US adults, that 71.8% of those who had internet at home, had a spouse or romantic partner, compared to 35.9% of those without internet. This was even after controlling for age, gender, education etc. +Research suggests that Facebook/virtual relationships may indeed benefit certain types of people. Baker and Oswald (2010) found that, of 207 students, those high in shyness reported greater use of Facebook to be associated with higher perceptions of friendship quality. +Virtual relationships may have a positive impact on relationships in the offline world. Zhao et al (2008) found that virtual relationships can allow individuals to bypass gating obstacles and create a new type of identity that they can’t create in the offline world. This can enhance self-image and increase chances of connecting in the offline world.
59
para definition
means one sided target individual is unaware of existence of person may be appealing as there are few demands and doesn't run risk of criticism or rejection
60
why might par asocial relationships occur
such as a lack of real relationships, shyness, loneliness (introverted) which fill a void in the persons life. most likely to form with a person they seem as attractive and similar(commonality/identification) to them
61
who developed levels of parasocial relationships
giles and maltby
62
what are the levels of par asocial relationships
first -entertainment social (celebrity is source of gossip/interaction) second - intense-personal (intensive, compulsive feelings towards a celebrity) last - borderline pathological (uncontrollable behaviours and fantasies)
63
who made absorption addiction model
McCutcheon
64
what is the absorption addiction model
absorption = adolescents who are introverted and find socialising hard may become absorbed with lives focussing on them gives them a sense of a special relationship addiction = when absorption is high it might become addictive leading to extreme behaviours such as constantly checking social in order to feel satisfied or connected
65
which attachment type is most likely to form a par asocial relationship
anxious resistant
66
attachment theory
-promximity seeking stay informed to their celebrity eg trivia -secure base = little to no chance of rejection provided with a 'safe heaven' -protest at seperation for example protest when Jeremy Clarkson left top gear -these needs fulfilled their unrealistic and unmet needs
67
evaluate parasocial relationships
-absorption links to mental health eg melty found using Eysenck personality questionnaire intense personal levels of PSR associated with nueroticism linked to depression TMB links explain why higher levels of PSR associated with poorer mental health +There is research support for factors involved in PSRs. Schiappa et al (2007) found that people were more likely to form a PSR with TV characters that they perceived as attractive and similar to themselves. -There is mixed evidence for the role of loneliness in PSRs. Greenwood and Long (2009) showed that people may develop PSRs as a way of dealing with loneliness or loss. However, Chory-Assad and Yanen (2005) found no relationship between intensity of loneliness and intensity of PSRs.