Research Flashcards

1
Q

most basic and pervasive of all research methods

A

observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the following involves making observations:

A

experimental, case study, and naturalistic approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • “casual observation”
  • does little by itself, can even lead to erroneous conclusions.
  • BUT can lead to development of hypothesis that can eventually be tested more systematically
A

unsystematic observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • carried out in real-life settings, but more systematic and rigorous
  • no real control exerted by observer, but observation is carefully planned
  • limited to a relatively few individuals and situations
A

naturalistic observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

similar to naturalistic observation in which carefully planned observations are made in real-life settings, except that the investigator exerts a degree of control over the events being observed.

A

controlled observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • involves the intensive study of one person - a client or patient who is in treatment.
  • include material from interviews, test responses, and treatment accounts
A

case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • the study of the incidence, prevalence, and distribution of illness or disease in a given population.
  • can give insight in identifying who are a risk.
A

epidemiological studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

refers to the rate of new cases of illness that develop within a given period of time

A

incidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

refers to the overall rate of cases (old or new) within a given period

A

prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

determining whether variable X is related to variable Y

A

correlational studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

possibility that a correlation between variables A and B is due to the influence of an unknown third variable rather than to a causal relationship between A and B.

A

third-variable problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • statistical method for examining the interrelationships among a number of variables at the same time.
  • uses many separate correlations to determine which variables change together and thus may have some underlying dimension in common.
A

factor analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

*evaluates or compares individuals, perhaps of different age groups, at the same point in time.
* we cannot assume age changes, only
differences among age groups

A

cross-sectional studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • follows the same subjects over time.
  • allows us to gain insight into for age changes; reduces third-variable problem
A

longitudinal studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

allows the researcher to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables or events.

A

experimental method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

we have two separate sets of participants, each of which receives a different kind of treatment or intervention.

A

between-group designs

17
Q

comparisons are made on same patients at different points in time.

A

within-groups design

18
Q

the extent that the change in the dependent variable is attributable to the manipulation of the independent variable.

A

internal validity

19
Q

when extraneous variables are not controlled or cannot be shown to exist equally in experimental and control groups, these variables may [ ]

A

confound the results

20
Q

where the expectations for the experimental manipulation cause the outcome rather than (or in addition to) the manipulation itself.

A

placebo effect

21
Q

neither participant nor experimenter knows what treatment or procedure is being used.

A

double-blind procedure

22
Q

the extent that its results are generalizable beyond the narrow conditions of the study.

A

external validity

23
Q
  • better internal validity is possible because of the superior control we can exert in the laboratory.
  • the Achilles heel of the method is the degree of similarity between this method and the real thing.
A

analog studies

24
Q
  • usually, an intervention is introduced after a reliable baseline is established, and the effects of the intervention are determined by comparing the baseline and postintervention levels of behavior.
  • allow the experimenter to establish cause–effect relationships
A

single-case designs

25
Q
  • permits measurement of a treatment’s effectiveness by systematic observation of changes in the participant’s behavior as treatment and no-treatment conditions alternate.
  • initial baseline period is followed by a treatment period, a return to the baseline, and then a second treatment period .
A

ABAB design

26
Q
  • designs used when it is not possible or ethical to employ a treatment reversal period.
  • baselines are established for two (or more) behaviors, treatment is introduced for one behavior, and then treatment is introduced for the second behavior as well.
A

multiple baseline designs