Research: lecture 1 Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

-involve more than just minimal risks to the participants
-involve a sensitive topic
-involve minors or other vulnerable populations (fetus, prisoner)

ex: most prospective research that includes an intervention requires a full review

Entire Board reviews

A

full

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the three levels of IRB review

A

full
expedited
exempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

-involve minimal risks to the participants
-sub-set of the board review

A

expedited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

-pose little risks to the partipants
- do not involve a sensitive topic
-do not involve vulnerable populations

A

exempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evidence based practice is the integration of

A

-best research evidence
-clinical expertise
-patient values/ situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does PICO stand for

A

Patient or problem
Intervention
Comparison intervention
Outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

this is a common way to develop a research question

A

PICO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does FINER stand for

A

Feasible
Interesting
Novel
Ethical
Relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

systemic reviews of RCTs

A

1a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

RCT with narrow CI

A

1b

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

all or none

A

1c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

systematic review of cohort studies

A

2a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cohort study or low quality RCT

A

2b

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

outcomes research

A

2c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

systematic review of case control studies

A

3a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

case reports, small case series

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

expert opinion without any critical appraisal, bench research

A

5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

dissemination of findings

A

-can be presented at a peer reviewed conference or published in a journal
-can be sharing your lit review findings with fellow clinicians at your clinic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

commission on accreditation in PT education requires DPT students engage in the research process

A

CAPTE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

includes research in their mission and promotes it through grant opportunities as well as through their online resources for clinicians

A

APTA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

being a consumer of literature means?

A

this requires an understanding EBP and you can use literature to impact your clinical practice/ decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

being a producer/contributor to the literature means?

A

this requires an understanding of research process (critical inquiry) and how it is tied with EBP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

why do researchers violate ethical principles?

A

-grant
-advancement/tenure
-publish/perish
-prestige
-deadlines
-others are counting on them for their GA positions
-want significant results –> their research took a bunch of time and resources..it looks bad if their theories are wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

______ is any manipulation, observation, or other study of a human being… done with the intent of developing new knowledge

A

research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
research requires _____ approval PRIOR to beginning any data collection or participant recruitment
IRB
26
can you go back and use old medical records and publish the data without IRB approval?
NO!
27
defined as a group that receives nothing or a group that receives standard intervention
control group
28
what is a dual review??
often more than one review is necessary if TWU and TCH are conducting a study together need a approval from both
29
institutional IRB agreement
formal agreement b/w institutions that allows them to share oversight responsibilities for research
30
elements of informed consent must include?
-participants must be fully informed - risk,benefit,time -participants info should be confidential and anonymous -consent form should be written in lay language about 6th grade -no penalty for withdraw -contact info must be provided -must sign every page and get a copy -voluntary consent
31
what happens after data collection?
-researcher must close the IRB and submit all signed consent forms
32
can you still analyze the data and write the manuscript after IRB is closed?
yes
33
can you be an author on a manuscript or poster even if your name wasn't included in the IRB?
yes
34
evidence based practice according to the APTA includes the integration of best _____, _______, and _____ when evaluating and treating pts and clients.
-best available evidence -clincial expertise -patient value/circumstances
35
ex: pediatric pt age 10-17 with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. hospitalized more than 1x per year at TCH falls under what in PCIO?
patient or problem
36
ex: 1:1 PT sessions to build endurance and provide education, 3x per week x 4 weeks falls under what in PICO
intervention (ex/cause or treatment)
37
ex: home exercise program with an activity log falls under what in PICO
comparison intervention (if necessary)
38
ex: can an indiviudalized skilled PT program increase endurance in pediatric clients with CF? fall under what in PICO
outcomes what would you like to find out?
39
what is the main alternative to compare with the intervention?
comparison intervention
40
which main intervention am i considering?
intervention (ex/cause or txt)
41
how would i describe a group of pt that are similar to mine?
patient or problem
42
three steps comprise formulation of great research quesiton?
1. ask interesting questions 2.select best question for research 3.transform question into testable hypothesis
43
what is a distinictive feature of medline?
records are indexed with NLM's medical subject headings (MeSH)
44
books,meta-analysis, reviews, and systematic reviews are all pre-digested ___ sources of info
secondary
45
only what provide primary sources of info? (2)
-RCT -clinical trials
46
what is considered original research
primary sources
47
databases and search engines that will locate specific articles
primary sources
48
what are predigested research
secondary sources
49
specialized database that answer clinical questions
secondary sources
50
strengths of primary sources (2)
-immediately current -full text
51
weakness of primary sources (2)
-all but PEDRO need to read and extract info to question -only finds articles in journals listed in their engine
52
unfiltered primary resources examples(3)
-RCT -Cohort studies -case controlled studies, case series/report
53
filtered secondary resources examples
systemic reviews metaanalysis
54
difference between SR vs MA?
SR: this review asks a specific clinical question, perform comprehensive lit search,estimate poorly done studies and attempt to make practice recommendations based on strongest studies meta: a SR plus it combines all data from studies and present the overall results
55
strength of secondary sources (2)
-summarize info for you -dont need to find articles
56
weakness of secondary sources (3)
-some better and more comprehensive -reviews in Cochrane are strong -always dated
57
levels vs grades
levels: ind study grades: summarize multiple studies
58
rank levels strongest evidence to weakest
1a, 1b,1c,2a,2b,3b,3a,3b,4,5
59
rank grades strongest to weakest evidence
A--->F
60
a preponderance of level 1 and level 2 studies support the recommendation. Must include at least 1 level 1 study
A strong evidence
61
a single high quality RCT or a preponderance of level II studies support the recommendation
B moderate evidence