Research Methods Flashcards
(117 cards)
Define social desirability
When ppts change their answer in order to meet the desires of investigator . This may be because their answer is embarrassing or not desired by researcher
define demand characteristics
When a ppt changes their behaviour/answers in order to be favoured by others (e.g. the researcher, ppts. Public)
define extraneous variables
any variable that has the potential to affect the DV – they do not vary systematically with the IV
define confounding variables
any variable that has affected the DV that does vary systematically with the IV
define investigator effects
Anything that a researcher may say or do (consciously or subconsciously) that may influence the behaviour/responses from a ppt
what is an example of participant extraneous variables (define )
-fatigue
-knowledge about task
-mood
an extraneous variable that already exists within the ppt
what is an example of situational extraneous variables
a variable that exists due to to the setting
-the weather
-the time
what are examples of investigator effects
-leading questions
-tone of voice
-speed of voice
time given to carry out task
what are two solutions to demand characteristics
single -blind trial
double -blind trial
what does single blind trial do and what does a double blind trial do
SBT-prevent demand characteristics and increases internal validity
DBT- prevents demand characteristics prevents investigator effect
define randomisation (examples)
the use of chance in order to control for the effect of bias when disguising materials and deciding the order
-the order of words
-length of words
-order of difficulty
-order of conditions
-order of correct answes
define standardisation
using exactly the same formalised procedure and instructions for all participants in a research study
-wundt during introspection used stardadristion
-prevents extraneous variable and confounding variables
define counterbalancing
when ppt in a repeated measures design are split in half ,with half of the ppts completing conditions in reverse order to the other half of the ppts.
explain how to use counterbalancing
-split ppts into two groups
-get the first group to complete conditions in one order
-get the second group to complete conditions in opposite order
-put the data together and compare each condition
strength and weaknesses of field experiment
strength -observes natural behaviour - therefore has high ecological validity.
weakness- ethical issues surrounding it breach in privacy
weakness- cannot be controlled and remove extraneous variables
strengths and weakness of labratory experiment
stength - high degree of control can remove exraneous variables
strength -can be replicated
weakness-low ecological validity since it doesnt observe natural behaviour
weakness and strength for quasi experiment
strength- controlled meaning high internal validity
weakness-cannot randomly allocate participants into different groups meaning there are some confounding variables and harder to conclude that the IV had an effect on the DV.
weakness and strength for the natural experiment
Strength -high external validity
Weakness -since they are rare occuring events ,it is hard to replicate the study
hard to randomise , meaning there can be confounding variables and extraneous variables
what is structured observation (include pros and cons )
when researcher quantifies what they are observing by making a pre determined list
pro : easier because more systemtic
quantative data is collected which is easier to analyse and compare with other data
con : -less risk of reasercher bias
what is unstructured observation
contains continuous data where the researcher writes everything they see during the observation
pro :more detail
con: researcher bias can be an issue
what is behaviour categories
when target behaviour is broken up into precise components which are observable and measurable. e.g aggressive behaviour.
What is sampling
refers to how often data is recorded
What are two types of sampling in observational designs
Time sampling
Event sampling
What is event sampling
counting the number of times a particular behaviour occurs in the target individual / group