Research Methods Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

Dependant variable

A

Measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Independent variable

A

Manipulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Extraneous variable

A

Might interfere with DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Confounding variable

A

Has definitely interfered with DV. Can be participant or situational.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Situational variable (confounding)

A

Stem from environment where experiment is conducted (eg. Light, noise). Can have a distorting effect on data so needs to be controlled as much as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Participant variable (confounding)

A

Stem from the way participants vary (eg. IQ, age). Can have a distorting effect in data so need to be controlled as much as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Demand characteristics

A

Cues in the environment which help the participants figure out what the research hypothesis is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Single blind technique

A

Participants don’t know the hypothesis or which condition they are in. Reduces chance of demand characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Investigator effects

A

Researcher may unconsciously behave in a way to bring out their prediction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Double blind technique

A

Neither participant or research assistant know the hypothesis or which condition the participants are in. Helps reduce chance of investigator effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Operationalisation

A

Clearly defining variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Objective

A

Specific, measurable, replicable, not subject to personal opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Subjective

A

Results can be impaired by personal interpretation/opinions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Internal validity

A

Lower chance of confounding variables = higher internal validity of the study. If only the IV is being tested and all variables have been controlled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ecological validity

A

How well the findings of a study can be generalised to real life settings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reliability

A

2 or more measurements or observations of the same psychological study are consistent with each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Validity

A

If you are actually measuring what you claim to be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Meta analysis

A

When a large number of studies,which have involved the same research question and methods of research, are combined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Quantitative data

A

Numerical (eg. Counting). Can be put into tables and graphs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Qualitative data

A

Non numerical (eg. Describing emotions). Provides insight into feelings and thoughts - much more detailed than quantitative data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Null hypothesis

A

IV will not impact DV. There will be no change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Aim

A

A precise statement of why a study is taking place/what is being studied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Hypothesis

A

A precise, testable prediction of what is expected to happen. (Experimental/alternative/null)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Experimental(looking for difference)/Alternative(looking for association) hypothesis.

A

Differences of DV re due to manipulation of the IV, and not chance factors. Can be 1 or 2 tailed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Directional '1 tailed' hypothesis
Predicts the direction of the results.
26
Non directional '2 tailed' hypothesis
Predicts there will be a difference, but doesn't state the direction of the results.
27
Ethical issues
The rules governing the conduct of researchers in investigations
28
Code of ethics
Informed consent Deception Withdrawal (right to) Protection from harm (physical and psychological) Confidentiality ( participants data not disclosed to anyone) Privacy
29
Presumptive consent
Gained from people from similar backgrounds to the participants. It is deemed that if they would consent then so would the participants.
30
Prior general consent
Participants agree to being deceived but don't know how they will be deceived. (Could cause participants to act differently to normal)
31
Retrospective consent
Asked for consent after the study. However they may not consent and will have already taken part.
32
Variable
A thing which varies
33
Social desirability bias
Behaving in a way you think people want you to.
34
Random sampling
Every member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected (eg picking names from a hat)
35
Random sampling Advantage
``` Most representative form of sampling. High validity (represents the whole target population) ```
36
Random sampling Disadvantage
Expensive | Time consuming
37
Opportunity sampling
Choosing the people for the sample from those available at the time.
38
Opportunity sampling Advantage
Quick and easy
39
Opportunity sampling Disadvantage
Not as representative because not all of the target population has a chance of being chosen.
40
Volunteer sampling
Participants consciously or unconsciously determine their own involvement. Eg reply to an advert (conscious) or a passer by in an observational study (unconscious).
41
Volunteer sampling Advantage
Quick and easy
42
Volunteer sampling Disadvantage
Doesn't produce a representative sample. High chance of bias. Only a certain type of people will choose to respond to the adverts.
43
Stratified sampling
A small scale reproduction of a population. Population is divided into characteristics important for the experiment like age. Then the population is randomly selected from each stratum.
44
Stratified sampling Advantage
``` Representative Unbiased (random sampling element) ```
45
Stratified sampling Disadvantage
Knowledge of population characteristics required. Time consuming.
46
Systematic sampling
Take every nth person from a list to create a sample. It involves calculating the size of the population to assess what size the sample needs to be.
47
Systematic sampling Advantage
Unbiased People picked at random Representative
48
Systematic sampling Disadvantage
Unbiased selection doesn't garuntee an unbiased sample. | Certain characteristics could reoccur every nth person, making the sample unrepresentative.
49
Laboratory experiment
Carried out in a controlled setting. Most commonly used method because it is objective and systematic. People may act differently to normal because they are in an unusual environment.
50
Field experiment
Controlled but outside a lab. Participants are usually unaware that they are involved. No social desirability bias because they don't know they're involved. Hard to control.
51
Natural experiment
The IV can't be manipulated but where it naturally varies its effects are observed. The effect of an IV can be studied where it would usually be unethical.
52
Quasi experiment
The IV is naturally occurring but there is more control over it than in natural experiments. Participants can't be randomly allocated to conditions so there may be confounding variables. Often carried out under controlled conditions so share the strengths of lab experiments.
53
Naturalistic observation
Take place in the setting where the target behaviour would naturally occur.
54
Controlled observation
Watching and recording behaviours in a structured and controlled environment. Some variables are controlled. Variables can be manipulated to observe effects.
55
Covert observation
Participant isn't aware they are being observed and hasn't given consent
56
Overt observation
Behaviour watched and recorded with participants knowledge and consent.
57
Participant observation
Researcher becomes a member of the group they are observing.
58
Non-participant observation
Researcher remains separate from the group they are observing.
59
Independent measures design
Participants are randomly allocated to either one or the other condition.
60
Repeated measures design
Same participants used in each condition.
61
Matched pairs design
Participants are matched as close as possible with another participant. The pairs are then randomly allocated to a condition. Monozygotic twins provide researchers with a very close match for participant variables.