Section 1: Origins of QM Flashcards

(70 cards)

1
Q

Two equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics

A
  1. wave mechanics
  2. matrix mechanics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

blackbody

A

perfect absorber and emitter of radiation

totally absorbs all ration that falls upon it

is in thermal equilibrium so has temp T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a blackbody is in thermal equilibrium so has

A

a temperature T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

emitted radiation depends only upon

A

the radiator’s temperature

follows stefan-boltzman law R=sigma T^4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

typical classical model for a perfect blackbody

A

is a black cavity with a small hole: all the light entering is reflected multiple times across the black walls and is (almost completely) absorbed.

Since the cavity is in thermal equilibrium, the emitted radiation depends only on its temperature, so the cavity emits like a black body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

total emittance obtained by

A

integrating over all wavelengths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

wavelength (or frequency) monochromatic energy density

A

u(λ,T) (or u(v,T))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

since u(λ,T)=4pi/c R(λ,T) - from a measurement of the emission spectrum one could

A

determine the energy density

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

samuel langley and his bolometer

A

Ohhhh…
Langley invented the bolometer,
A very fine sort of thermometer.
It can measure the heat,
Of a polar bear’s feet
At the distance of half a kilometer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

From general thermodynamical arguments, in 1893 Wien showed that the black-body energy density had to take the form

A

u(λ,T)=dE/dλ - λ^-5 f(λT)

or in terms of f:
u(v,T) = dE/dv = v^3g(v/T)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

f(λT) and g(v/T) are

A

universal functions that depend solely upon λT and v/T respectively and cannot be derived thermodynamically.

Have to be found empirically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

u(v,T) = dE/dv = v^3g(v/T) is called

A

Wien’s Law (NOT wien’s displacement law!!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

wien’s law is a good model for

A

the observed spectrum at short wavelength (high freq)

hc&raquo_space; kbTλ

not accurate at high wavelengths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explicit form of wien’s approximation for the spectral emittance

A

from relation between spectral emittance and energy density

planck later introduced fundamental constants to the approximation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

problem’s with Wien’s approximation

A

This model works well at small wavelengths but it is not very good at high wavelengths - low frequencies.

Thermodynamical reasoning is not sufficient to derive an accurate model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wien’s displacement law

A

λmax = b/T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Wien’s displacement law derivation

A
  1. start from energy density in wien’s law - peak by imposing du/dv=0
  2. define x=v/T

3.only depends on x, not v or T individually so do not need o solve explicitly

only get proportionality, cannot solve for constant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The Rayleigh-Jeans law is a good approximation to the observed spectrum at

A

long wavelengths - low freq

hc«kbTλ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

big problem with the Rayleigh-Jeans law

A

UV CATASTROPHE

the radiance keeps increasing indefinitely at short wavelengths (higher frequencies). If it were true, the power emitted at short wavelengths would be infinite!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

the UV catastrophe indicates the

A

failure of classical physics to explain the behaviour of thermal radiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Planck was able to derive a spectrum that fits the observed data of the blackbody spectral emission by assuming

A

that energy comes in discrete quanta of energy

E=hv

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

graph to compare planck, wien and RJ

A

plot spectral radiance against wavelength

wien follows standard curve
planck agrees on far side, but increased radiance slightly

RJ off to the right and displaying UV catstrophe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

According to the classical theory, the average energy per mode can be obtained starting from the

A

maxwell boltzmann distribution and using the classical equipartition of energy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

demonstrating the result of planck’s model

A
  1. start with LHS, sub in x=e^-hv/kbT

2, use geometric series to reach RHS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
In classical physics the occupation of each mode was equally possible, but since modes are quantised and each quanta has energy E=hv, exciting higher modes is
less probable as it requires more energy
26
the probability that a mode will be occupied is given by
the Bose-Einstein distribution function
27
The classical theory stated that each mode needed equal energy of kbT to be excited, in accordance with the equipartition of energy. However, the average energy per “mode” (or “quantum”) is given by
its energy hv times the probability that this will be occupied
28
The energy density is then given by the
number of modes, per unit volume, per unit frequency, times the average energy per mode
29
understanding the planck distribution - for small hv/kbT
the discrete steps are small enough that the distribution is pseudo-continuous: recover classical Rayleigh–Jeans form
30
understanding the planck distribution - at large hv/kbT
the first non-zero mode is highly Boltzmann-suppressed: finite energy in the cavity solves the ultraviolet catastrophe!
31
photoelectric effect - what is expected classically
if we treat light as a wave, we know that its energy depends on the intensity, and therefore on the amplitude of the EM wave.
32
Simulated experiment 1: changing the material and the wavelength
Nothing happens until the wavelength reaches a certain threshold where then electrons start being emitted If we change the material, the critical frequency changes
33
the more we increase the frequency...
the faster the electrons move - this means they have more kinetic energy
34
Simulated experiment 2: changing the intensity and the voltage - null voltage
the current increases with increasing intensity, and in fact we can observe that more electrons are released and all of them reach the collector at higher intensities.
35
Simulated experiment 2: changing the intensity and the voltage - positive voltage
now the electrons are moving faster because of the potential, and the system reaches a saturation current
36
Simulated experiment 2: changing the intensity and the voltage - negative voltage
increasingly higher proportions of electrons start travelling towards the collector but come back, as now the potential is opposed to the initial motion of the electrons.
37
Since the intensity changes the number of electrons emitted and therefore the photocurrent, at a fixed negative voltage the photocurrent will
decrease with decreasing intensity
38
regardless of light intensity, we can eventually reduce the photocurrent to 0 with
a negative stopping voltage V0
39
The stopping voltage decreases linearly with
the light frequency, until it reaches 0 there is no photocurrent below a threshold frequency
40
Electrons are emitted when
a work of at least the binding energy is paid to free them
41
minimum work that needs to be done to emit electrons is
Eb=hv-W
42
minimum threshold frequency necessary to eject electrons
vth = W/h
43
the additional energy results in
kinetic energy which determines a maximum possible velocity
44
The intensity determines the
number of photons present in the light sent to the metallic plate
45
higher intensity means that
more electron can be extracted (if freq above vth)
46
bohr model postulates
e- move in quantised circular orbits depending on newton and coulombs laws must emit/absrob quanta of energy to move orbits atomic angular momentum quantised
47
Why did the quantum and classical results agree in atoms with large mass number?
Because in large systems classical physics is a good approximation of quantum physics
48
Bohr’s correspondence principle
Predictions of quantum theory must correspond to the predictions of classical physics in the region of sizes where classical theory is “known to hold”. The classical limit should be recovered from the quantum results, for n --> infinity
49
problems with Bohr's model
failed to predict the observed intensities of spectral lines limiting for multi-electron atoms
50
What happens if electrons interact with light at high frequencies such as X-ray?
reasonable to consider the electrons free, since the binding energy of the atom is very small compared to the X-ray energy, so the interaction between the high-frequency radiation and the electron would result in scattering.
51
compton scattering - classical expectation
when the EM wave is scattered off atoms, the wavelength of scattered radiation should be the same as the wavelength of the incident radiation
52
Compton found that with increasing scattering angle, a
second peak was appearing at longer wavelength compared to the one of the incident light
53
compton shift
the change in wavelength between the peaks of the incoming beam and the scattered beam
54
p=
h bar k =hv/c =h/λ
55
k=
2pi/λ
56
de broglie wavelength
λdb = h/p
57
de broglie wavenumber
k=2pi/λdb
58
how de broglie gives a qualitative explanation of Bohr
electrons would interfere, leaving areas of destructive interference where “electrons are forbidden”, while only standing waves would be allowed to “fit” in the Bohr’s circular orbits.
59
de broglie explaining bohr - the standing waves allowed to fit would be given by
a discrete set of wavelengths that interfer constructively if an integral number of wavelengths fits exactly into the circumference of the orbit nλ=2pir (r= radius of the circular orbit)
60
kinetic energy of the electron
p^2/2m
61
why experimental de broglie is difficult
ideally would use experiments already used in optics ie diffraction but order of nm - impossible to design a diffraction grating for such small distances
62
classical physics is
deterministic can determine what will happen next the process of observing (measuring) a classical system does not affect the final configuration of the system.
63
quantum physics is
probabilistic
64
electron orbitals are characterised by
quantum numbers
65
principle quantum number
n indicates the energy level and relative size of the orbital positive integer values: 1,2,3,...
66
orbital angular momentum quantum number
l defines the shape of the orbital takes values from 0 to n-1 each value corresponds to a specific type of orbital (s,p,d,f)
67
magnetic quantum number
ml describes the orientation of the orbital in space takes integer values from -l to +l
68
spin quantum number
s for an electron =1/2
69
sin magnetic quantum number
ms specifies the electron's spin direction which can either be +1/2 or -1/2
70