Section 5: Solutions of Schrodinger Equations in 1D - Scattering States Flashcards

(18 cards)

1
Q

scattering states - E

A

> U

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

scattering off infinite steps is rather boring

A

the incoming wavepacket just bounces back — and just like with bound states, this means the solutions are plane waves or decaying exponentials through each distinct U(x)=const region

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Unlike the bound states, though, the boundary conditions no longer force the solutions to be

A

real-valued

meaning probability flux will be non-zero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scattering states are not localised in space, so the wavefunctions are not

A

normalisable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the probability fluxes must satisfy

A

the flux conservation
JI=JR+JT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the flux conservation can be normalised to JI to give the condition

A

R+T=1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

scattering from forbidden potential step (E<V)

A

The transmitted component is
0 in the sense that there is not a probability flux in region 2, but there is still a probability density in region II due to tunneling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

steps for potential step calculations

A
  1. write the wavefunctions for the two regions
  2. impose continuity conditions and its derivative
  3. rearrange
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

scattering from potential well (double step)

A

similar but an algebraic pain as now 5 wave components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

scattering from potential well (double step) - interesting takeaway is

A

the interference of incoming and reflected waves, with the same wavenumber, gives rise to interference patterns in the form of standing waves on the “incident” side of the step. This interference is then seen again within the region between two steps.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ramsauer effect - limit E»|V|

A

the finite well is barely visible

the transmission is perfect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ramsauer-Townsend effect

A

does not have a classical explanation

if the incident wavelength is a multiple of the width of the well, then there is perfect transmission,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

quantum tunnelling

A

a finite, albeit exponentially suppressed, wavefunction manages to “leak through” the classically forbidden region and resume its oscillatory behaviour on reaching the classically allowed region on the other side.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

tunneling - the procedure to find the ampltidues

A

still the same

impose continuity conditions for wavefunction and its derivative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can we have flux on the left- and right-hand sides of the barrier, but no flux within?

A

we can’t

C has a different overall complex phase than D

the phase-interaction of the two decaying waves within the barrier that creates a non-zero flux within the barrier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The tunnelling phenomenon is of phenomenal importance, both in human affairs via quantum tunnelling technologies such as

A

scanning tunnelling microscopes

17
Q

tunneling deeply important in natural processes such as

A

alpha decay
alpha capture in nuclear fusion