Session 2 Week 4 Flashcards
(109 cards)
Sovereign Immunity
Started with either Roman Law or English Common Law based on the belief that the King could do no wrong.
Sovereign Immunity, the great concern from the states was what?
Who ultimately ruled, the federal Government or the individual state.
The 11th amendment does what?
Limited the judiciary and shielded government with sovereign immunity. The judicial powers of the US shall not be construed to extent to any suit in law or equity commenced or prosecuted against one of the US citizens of another state by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.
In 1821 in Cohen V Virginia, the supreme court ruled the Federal Government was immune but?
citizens could bring suit against a state if the action was based on a constitutional guarantee and was later amended to prohibit suits absent the states consent.
In 1834 the Supreme Court held in US v Clark that even suits based on constitutional guarantees would be barred; why?
Public service would be hindered and public safety endangered if the state could be subjected to a suit.
Today while states are still protected, unless voluntarily relinquish their protection, municipalities are not. Therefore, municipal officers are?
susceptible to civil suit.
When should pursuits be authorized?
Exigent circumstances where their is a reasonable belief that the continuing conduct of the violator presents an immediate and life threatening danger. Murder, Sex Bat, Manslaughter etc.
Supervisor responsibilities in a pursuit?
Get on radio
determine reason for pursuit
clear traffic
Air Support K-9 (K-9 not involved in pursuit)
# of vehs involved
conditions road weather speed congestions
coordinate other units report to scene
With pursuits, keep foremost ?
The community comes first.
More cops are killed by______ than _______?
Crashes than bullets
Three old rules in order?
Sovereign Immunity
Negligence/Duty
Proximate Cause
Municipalities lost their sovereign immunity in high speed pursuits based on what case law?
City of Pinellas Park Vs. Brown (7/23/1992)
In the City of Pinellas Park v Brown it stated in the absence of an emergency…?
The method chosen for engaging in hot pursuit will remain an operational function that is not immune from liability if accomplished in a manner contrary to reason and public safety.
In Pinellas Park V Brown there were two main points. What were they?
The actions were contrary to Reason and Public Safety. At the officer failed to clear the intersection with the pursuit coming.
Proximate Cause: Definition of foreseeability issue
“Human experience suggests serious bodily injury likely to result based upon alleged facts.”
Fourth Amendment Reasonableness standard states what as it applies to pursuits?
High speed police chases with n intent to harm suspects physically do not give rise to liability under the 14th amendment. In the Lewis case the court indicated that a seizure must be an intentional act, an accidental seizure does not apply for 4th amendment purposes.
Reasonableness standard (4th amendment): Allegation that a pursuit was undertaken with deliberate indifference to passenger survival was?
insufficient to state a substantive due process claim.
In Scott v Harris it defined two things about PIT
PIT is deadly use of force and reasonableness standard applies, meaning if there are others who would be endangered.
Key factors in developing police pursuit policies
Use of force, roles and responsibilities, communications responsibilities, environmental conditions, reasons for initiating the pursuit, reasons for terminating the pursuit, interjurisdictional pursuits, vehicles, use of emergency warning devices, use of stopping devices (Most will result in use of force, Supervisor must take charge)
Supervisor’s responsibilities
Time place location supervisor take control.
Must come on the air and take charge
Need unambiguous reason for the pursuit
Needs to limit the # of units involved
Needs to direct units or other resources
Need to maintain radio contact with dispatch and relay updates as to operational or tactical potions and conditions.
Negligent appointment defined?
The hiring of an employee who was not qualified for the position. A cause of action exists against an employer for negligent hiring or retaining in his employment, The employee he knew or should have known was unfit for the job so as to create a danger of harm to third parties.
Deliberate indifference
You knew or should have known that your act or omission to act caused harm or created the danger of harm.
10 steps to hire
1 Advertise 2 short form application 3 written exam with bearing on law enforcement (pass/fail) 4 Agility test with applicant responsible for doctors approval (pass/fail) 5 long form application by hand in ink with statement on omission or admission 6 oral board (pass/fail) 7 Polygraph or CVSA (used as tool for background 8 background (pass/fail) 9 conditional offer (is specific) 10 psych/medical exam
Negligence hiring claim
The employer’s negligence in hiring or retaining the employee was the proximate cause of the injury
Under a facially valid screening program a single incident of hiring is not sufficient to show liability unless a reasonable background examination would lead a reasonable policy maker to conclude that to the applicant would lead to a deprivation of a plaintiff’s constitutional right.