Sex Research Methods Flashcards
(41 cards)
Challenges within sex research?
- Finding participants who are willing to participate and honestly report on aspects of their sexuality
- Finding a sample that is generalisable
- Trying to minimise bias (cultural, religious, political)
- Selecting an appropriate research method
Volunteer bias in sex research?
- Advertised as a Personality Study, with questions other than related to sex
- Looked at willingness to volunteer in Sexuality Research
N = 1031 individuals
Cisgender men = 307
Cisgender women = 719
Transgender men = 3
Transgender women = 2
28% of men and 36% of women reported sexual attractions to both gender/sex or the same gender/sex
Results?
Results
- As perceived invasiveness of study procedures increased, willingness to volunteer decreased.
- More men than women were willing to do the more invasive studies.
- Sexual attraction influence the effects, such that individuals with any degree of same gender/sec attraction were more willing to volunteer for the more invasive studies.
Predictors of willingness to volunteer in sex research?
- More sexual experience
- More positive sexual attitudes
- Higher levels of impression management
What methodology is best when conducting sex research?
- Some methodologies are better suited to certain research questions or to certain samples
- Each methodology has strengths and weaknesses, which researchers must weigh when designing their studies
Qualitative vs. Quantitive
Qualitative?
- Accounts for the subjective aspects
- Attitudes, beliefs, emotions
- Participant as the expert
- Less concerned with “average”
- Captures the diversity
- Descriptive
- Great first step to understand a phenomenon
Qualitative vs. Quantitive Quantitative?
- Allow for the objective measurement of behaviour and processes
- Useful in experiments
- Allows for examinations of cause and effect
- Interview Methods
Kinsey?
- Descriptive
- Asked questions about marriage, sexual health education, physical history, masturbation, sexual orientation, sexual behaviours
Kinsey Scale of sexual orientation?
- The Kinsey scale of sexual orientation was based on both qualitative and quantitative methodologies
- Worked from the assumption that everyone has engaged in a wide variety of sexual of sexual behaviours
- 0-1, 6 Bisexual, 3 any other gender/sex, 0 only the other gender/sex
Criticism of Kinsey Scale of sexual orientation?
- Oversamples white men/women
- Nonrandom sampling
- Outdated language
- Conflates attraction with behaviour
- Single axis
- Attraction exists, regardless of behavioural stigma or limitations
Asexuality designed as X
- Observational Methods
Master & Johnson?
- First systematic large scale study of human sexual response in the 1950s
- Empirical approach to sexuality
- Observed AND measured sexual response!
Master & Johnson
Observational Studies?
- Book 1: Human Sexual Response (1966)
- Book 2: Human Sexual Inadequacy (1970)
Observed 694 individuals masturbate and/or have sexual interaction to: - Speculate about patterns of sexual response
- Characterise abnormal sexual function
- Measured physiology
Criticism of Master & Johnson Observational Studies?
- Oversampling white individuals
- Focusing on orgasm as the goal of “normal” sex
- Over emphasis on the physiological aspects of sex
- Pathologizing variation in sexual behaviour, medical model of dysfunction
Sex Research Methods & Designs? (3)
- Descriptive
- Direct observation
- Interview
- Case study
- Correlational
- Surveys
- Experimental
- Sexual psychophysiology
- Brain Imaging
Descriptive Designs?
- Summarising patterns
- Generate ideas for future research by documenting aspects of sexuality from observation or self-report
- Can be qualitative (small samples) and quantitative (large samples)
Direct Observation? + Weaknesses
- Most basic and non-intrusive descriptive method
- Monitoring or recording of patterns of sexual or relational behaviour
- Can provide important contextual information
Strengths: ecologically valid; can code behaviours; reduces retrospective biases
Weaknesses: researcher has no control/cannot manipulate the behaviours of interest; observation can influence behaviour
Interviews? + limited by
- The purpose is to collected detailed self-report data
- Has the advantage of being able to ask additional questions
- Useful clinically
Limited by: - Recall/memory bias
- Responder bias (impression management/social desirability)
Case Study? + Weaknesses
- Examines a single individual, event, or group of interest in great detail over a period of time
- Can provide a longitudinal account
- Really useful for studying things that are rare/uncommon
Weaknesses: - Interpretation bias
- Poor generalisability
- Lack of a control group or experimental design
Surveys
Correlational?
- How variables change in relationship to one another
- Can be over time
- Can be within couples
Surveys
Standardised?
- Validated, tested though many different studies
- Fixed set of questions/responses
- Scores are meaningful, and associated with a certain outcome
Surveys
Validity/Reliability?
- Clarity of questions
- Defined terminology
Surveys
Unstandardised?
- Fixed set of questions with fixed and open responses
- Something that has not been studied yet, we haven’t validated this measure
Surveys
Sampling?
- Convenience
- Random
- Stratified
“I Am Double The Bi”: Positive Aspects of Being Both Bisexual and Biracial
- All three authors identify as bisexual/pansexual/queer and biracial or Black.
- Survey method + qualitative to descriptively examine the positives of being bisexual and biracial.
4 Findings?
- Uniqueness of being: “I am the only one of me around” (bisexual, Black and White 21-year old)
- Multiplicity of experience: “ it allows me to see different sides to issues from my many identities
- Community connection “I get the best of both worlds”
- Stench and impact: “I am able to emphasise more. It comes with its own unique sense of pride.”
Psychophysiological Methods?
- Measures of Genital Response
- Eye tracking
- Brain Imaging