Smart PLS Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

A

a family of statistical models that seek to explain the relationships among multiple variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What can SEM be used for?

A

regression analysis, path analysis and factor analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research goals:
CB-SEM
PLS-SEM

A

Parameter-oriented
Prediction-oriented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method:
CB-SEM
PLS-SEM

A

Covariance-based
Variance-based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Data assumption:
CB-SEM
PLS-SEM

A

Normal distribution
None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Good reasons to use PLS-SEM

A
  • Estimation of complex models
  • Integration of formatively measured constructs
  • Working with small sample sizes
  • Focus is on prediction
  • Focus is on exploring new relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Not so good reasons to use PLS-SEM

A
  • Focus is on exploring new relationships without having a hypothesized model.
  • Working with small sample sizes (when the population is large)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Path model

A

a diagram that connects variables/constructs based on theory and logic to visually display the hypotheses that will be tested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Correlation

A

linear relationship between two variables
range from -1 to +1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Covariance

A
  • unstandardised form of correlation
  • positive number leads to positive relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reflective scale

A

changes in the latent variable directly cause changes in the assigned indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Formative scale

A

changes in one or more of the indicators cause changes in the latent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stage 1:

A

Evaluation of the Measurement Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reliability models

A
  • Indicator Reliability (Loading)
  • Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach Alpha values
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Indicator Reliability (Loading) and Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach Alpha values

A

Each indicator’s loading should be above 0.7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Convergent Validity

A

Average Variance Extracted (AVE) should be above 0.5, meaning that more than 50% of the variance is explained by the construct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Discriminant Validity

A

Each construct should be distinct from others, often assessed using the Fornell-Larcker criterion or the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT).

18
Q

Fornell-Larcker Criterion:

A

The square root of AVE of each construct should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct.

19
Q

HTMT:

A

Should be below 0.9 (or 0.85 for stricter threshold).

20
Q

Reliability

A

the consistency or stability of a measurement instrument. A reliable instrument yields the same results under consistent conditions.

21
Q

Internal Consistency:

A

Assesses the consistency of results across items within a test.
- Commonly used metrics:
Cronbach’s Alpha and
Composite Reliability (CR)

22
Q

Indicator reliability

A

the degree to which an individual indicator (or observed variable) consistently and accurately measures the construct it is intended to measure. PLS-SEM= examining the loadings

23
Q

loadings

A

measure of how strongly it correlates with its latent variable.

24
Q

Validity

A

how well a test or measurement tool actually measures what it is intended to measure. It’s about accuracy.
- Convergent and Discriminant Validity

25
Convergent validity
how similar they are
26
Covergent Validity uses
Average Variance Extracted
27
AVE should be
greater than 0.5 = 50% of the variance in the indicators is explained by the construct
28
Discriminant validity
how different they are
29
Discriminant validity uses
Fornell-Larcker Criterion and HTMT
30
Fornell- Larcker
The square root of the AVE for each construct should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct.
31
HTMT
The ratio should be below 0.9 (or 0.85 for stricter criteria).
32
Stage 2:
Check to see if there are any multicollinearity issues
33
Inner Collinearity
the correlation between the predictor constructs in the structural model. - Assess for multicollinearity to ensure reliable path coefficient estimates.
34
Variance Inflation Factor (VIF)
measures the extent to which the variance of a regression coefficient is inflated due to multicollinearity with other predictors. -It will show you which item has a problem
35
VIF should be
less than 5
36
Predictive relevance (R squared)
the proportion of variance in the dependent variables (endogenous constructs) that is explained by the independent variables (exogenous constructs). - Evaluate how well the model explains and predicts the endogenous variables.
37
Model Fit
how well the model reproduces the observed data. - Measure how well the model reproduces the observed data.
38
Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR)
SRMR is a measure of the average discrepancy between the observed and predicted correlations.
39
Significance and Path Coefficients:
Path coefficients represent the strength and direction of the relationships between constructs in the structural model. - Check the statistical significance and practical relevance of the relationships between constructs.
40
Strong path coefficient
close to -1 or 1
41