Social

Question 1

Bocchiaro - background

Answer 1

Achieve a greater understanding about the nurture of disobedience

Question 2

Bocchiaro - research methods

Answer 2

Lab experiment

Question 3

Bocchiaro - Pilot studies

Answer 3

8 pilot tests - procedure was creditable and morally acceptable to the participants

Question 4

Bocchiaro- sample

Answer 4

149 undergraduate students from Vu university in Amsterdam - 96 female , 53 male - mean age 20

Question 5

Bocchiaro- procedure - room 1

Answer 5

Male Dutch experimenter
Participants asked to provide few names of fellow students
Cover - sensory deprivation
3 mins to analyse

Question 6

Bocchiaro- procedure - room 2

Answer 6

Asked to write an enthusiastic statement -at least 2 adjectives-exciting ,incredible,great or Superb-cannot mention the negative effects of sensory deprivation
Mailbox and research vomited form - ethical
7 mins to write statement

Question 7

Bocchiaro- procedure- follow up - room 1

Answer 7

2 personality tests -Hexaco , social value orientation
Given full debrief

Question 8

Bocchiaro-findings

Answer 8

Obedient -76.5%
Disobedient-14.1%
Whistleblower-9.4% -open - 3.4% - anonymous - 6%

Question 9

Bocchiaro- personality results

Answer 9

Results suggest a tend to whistleblowers having more faith than obedient or disobedient participants

Question 10

Bocchiaro- conclusion

Answer 10

Vagabond in a moral manner is challenging for people

Question 11

Levine - background

Answer 11

Different countries have found that people living in urban areas tend to be less helpful than those in rural settings

Question 12

Levine - aims

Answer 12

To see if the tendency of people within a city to offer non -emergent help to a stranger was stable across different situations with people in need
To see if helping of strangers varies across cultures

Question 13

Levine -procedure

Answer 13

All experimenters - male , college age - trained for their role - detailed instructions on how to act and how to score participants- internal students who returned home during the holidays - dropped pen , hurt leg , helping a blind person across the street , discarded tasks

Question 14

Levine - measure sand how participants were selected

Answer 14

Each helping measure was administered in 2 or more locations - main city centre districts
Summer months - 1 or more years between - 1992 - 1997

Question 15

Levine - results

Answer 15

Most helpful - Rio de Janeiro- 93.33%
Last helpful- Kulumpar , Malaysia - 40.33%

Question 16

Levine - conclusion

Answer 16

Negative correlation , purchasing power parity and overall levels of helping
Countries with simpatica tradition on average more helpful than others

Question 17

Milgram - aim

Answer 17

To investigate what level of obedience participants would go to when asked to deliver electric shocks to someone by an authority figure

Question 18

Milgram - research methods

Answer 18

Lab experiment and observation

Question 19

Milgram - study

Answer 19

40 white males from New Haven - aged 20-50 with varying occupations
Responded to news paper ads - self selected
Paid $4.50

Question 20

Milgram - procedure

Answer 20

The teacher - participant- was seated in a room adjacent to the learner and read over the inter com a series of word - pairs
The teacher then asked the learner to identify the right answers
If the learner got wrong the teacher administered a shock
The experimenters used prods - please continue
All participants were debriefed

Question 21

Milgram - results

Answer 21

100% went to 300 volts
65% shocked up to 450 volts

Question 22

Milgram - conclusion

Answer 22

This situation produces extremely strong tendencies to obey
The situation generates extraordinary stress and emotional strain

Question 23

Pilivan - background

Answer 23

Kitty Genoese - murdered to death over a period of 30 mins in front of 30 responsive witness - allegedly

Question 24

Piliavan - key terms

Answer 24

Bystander apathy
Diffusion of responsibility

Question 25

Piliavin - aims/ research questions

Answer 25

They types of victims The race of victims The presence of helping models The size of the witnessing group

Question 26

Pilivan - IVs

Answer 26

Victims conditions - I’ll or drunk White or black Model conditions - early or late Critical or adjacent

Question 27

Piliavin - DVs

Answer 27

Frequency of help Speed of help Race of helper Sex of helper Verbal comments Movement of the area - critical or adjacent

Question 28

Piliavin -procedure

Answer 28

4 teams of students -each made up of a victim , model and 2 observers would board the train - and then approximately 70 seconds into the journey as the train would pass the first station the victim would collapse .Until he received help he would remain lying on the floor

Question 29

Piliavin - results

Answer 29

The cane victims received spontaneous help 62 of 65 trials - 5 second a and the drunk received help in 19 of the 38 trials - 109 seconds 90% of the spontaneous helpers were male Slight race bias

Question 30

Pilivan - sample

Answer 30

4450 participants over 3 months 55% white 45% black New York subway