Social Harms and Zemiology Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

Which perspective influences the social harm perspective?

A

developed out of critical criminology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

According to the social harm perspective, why is it problematic to ask why certain people commit crime?

A

Because the concept of ‘crime’ is socially constructed, and focusing only on state-defined crime ignores broader social harms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What concept did Lombroso introduce regarding criminals?

A

Lombroso introduced the idea of atavism, suggesting that criminals are less evolved than normal people and can be identified by their physical characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is biological essentialism in the context of Lombroso’s theories?

A

that criminals are born like that instead of taught

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what can be used to highlight state defined crime and lombrosos biological essentialism

A

Dangerous Dogs Act - Breed Specific legislation
Canning & Tombs, 2021

It treats certain dog breeds as naturally dangerous, similar to Lombroso’s belief in inborn criminal traits.

Laws that ban or restrict dogs based on breed or appearance (e.g., “pit bull”), assuming danger is inherent, not situational (RSPCA, 2016).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who were key figures in developing the social harm perspective?

A

Hillyard, Tombs, Canning, Pemberton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does Canning & Tombs (2021) critique BSL?

A

They argue it reflects stereotypes based on appearance rather than behaviour — a modern form of biological essentialism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can BSL reinforce social inequality?

A

It disproportionately affects working-class and racialised communities, contributing to over-policing of marginalised groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is zemiology?

A

The study of social harms, proposed as a separate discipline from criminology that critiques the limits of legal definitions of crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can the criminal justice system itself cause harm?

A

By punishing people in ways that worsen their situation—e.g. sending drug users to prison where they may have greater access to drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does zemiology dismiss traditional crimes like violence?

A

No
it recognises them but argues that other widespread harms (e.g. poverty, neglect, marginalisation) often receive less attention despite greater impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does it mean to say “crime has no ontological reality”?

A

It means crime doesn’t objectively exist in the world—it is socially constructed, and we only know something is a crime if the law says so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is it problematic that crime consists mostly of petty events?

A

Because most legally defined crimes are relatively minor, while more serious harms (e.g. corporate wrongdoing, government neglect) are not criminalised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is the construction of crime considered class-biased?

A

Law focuses on individual guilt (mens rea), making it hard to prosecute institutions or elites, as seen in cases like Grenfell, where corporate intent is hard to prove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the critique of crime control systems like prisons?

A

They are largely ineffective, don’t rehabilitate, have high reoffending rates, and instead reproduce harm, especially for marginalised populations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do prisons relate to power and inequality?

A

Prisons act as warehouses for ‘problem populations’, disproportionately targeting racialised and working-class individuals, while profiting private companies.

17
Q

How does the category of crime expand state power?

A

By framing certain acts as crimes, the state legitimises control, punishment, and surveillance, often protecting the powerful while criminalising the vulnerable.

18
Q

Who defines crime and why does it matter?

A

The state and powerful groups define crime, meaning laws often serve their interests and ignore or downplay harms they themselves may cause

19
Q

In what stages did zemiology develop

A

criminology–> critical criminology—> social harm perspective—> zemiology

20
Q

What is the argument for zemiology as a separate discipline?

A

Some argue that social harm goes beyond criminology, requiring its own field—zemiology—to fully address issues that criminology neglects or upholds.

21
Q

What does the social harms approach offer for prevention?

A

It encourages more effective responses rooted in human rights and justice for all, not just punitive measures.

22
Q

What social harms are highlighted by Pemberton

A

Pemberton examines homicide, suicide, infant mortality, obesity, road traffic accidents, poverty, long working hours, youth unemployment, and social isolation.

23
Q

What is the main strength of social harms/Zemiology?

A

It provides a broader and more inclusive focus on harmful acts, going beyond the confines of criminal law.

24
Q

What is a criticism of the concept of “social harm”?

A

The concept is too broad and lacks specificity, making it difficult to apply consistently.

25
Is the study of social harms really different from critical criminology?
debated social harms/Zemiology may not be fundamentally different from critical criminology both challenge traditional views but may still have overlapping themes.
26
what does social harms perspective suggest we focus on?
- harms beyond the criminal law - forms of legal violation e.g. health and safety regulation - some harms are punishable but go unpunished e.g. water companies dumping sewage - harms produced as a result of intervention e.g. BSL - Non-criminal acts that are morally wrong and equally harmful
27
what 5 critiques of criminology reflect ideas similar to critical criminology
- crime has no ontological reality - criminology perpetuates the myth of crime - criminalisation begins once an act is deemed criminal - the construction of crime is a complex process - crime maintains power relations/struggles
28
3 more critiques of criminology
- it ignores harmful, non criminal acts - crime control is ineffective - considers many petty and not that harmful acts as crime