social inequalities: gender, kmr, paper 2 Flashcards
(34 cards)
20 marker: gender pay gap 2024
7% (ONS)
20 marker: reasons for gender pay gap: canalisation (gender role socialisation)
- career choice
- mother role
- girls are primary socialised into cooking and dolls
- boys: leaders, take risks, dominant
- girls: passive and obedient
20 marker:reasons for gender pay gap: biology
- new right belief
- men are born leaders
- functionalists take on the ‘instrumental’ role, breadwinners
- feminists: women have the ‘burden of childcare’, women give birth
- functionalists: women do the expressive role (3 c’s)
20 marker: reasons for gender pay gap: discrimination
- feminists: women dont get promoted (glass ceiling)
- employers opinion
20 marker: li and devine and upward mobility
- women are still less likely to be upwardly mobile and more likely to be downwardly mobile than men
heath and li and upward mobility
- chinese women (46.8%) were found to experience lower rates of upward mobility than black Caribbean women (67.3%)
- study also showed that for second generation south asian groups in the uk, men had benefited more from upward occupational mobility than women
20 marker: feminisation of poverty
- pensioners poverty, life expectancy is longer
- harder for women to get out of cycle of poverty, career consists of children and family, job prospects are limited, more likely to be careers
- more likely to be single parents (poverty trap)
- invisibility of female poverty, put family first
- period poverty
- pink tax: more expensive to be a woman
- gender pay gap, lower paid jobs
ruth lister and feminisation of poverty (2004)
- high rates of both official and hidden poverty for women reflect, ‘on the one hand structural factors associated with women’s economic dependance and make power and on the other hand, the agency of women who will sacrifice their own needs on behalf of other family members, especially their own children
- women are not just more likely to suffer poverty, they also have more responsibility with dealing its effects
- ‘it tends to be women who manage poverty and debt as part of their general responsibility for money management in low income families
- may lead to extra stress or ill health
- women may suffer from ‘time poverty’ because of their continued responsibility for most domestic labour
20 marker: wilmott and young and symmetrical family
- in modern society, we have a symmetrical family where men now spend an equal amount on domestic areas, join decision making and spend lots of leisure time as a family unit
- they said it was evident in middle class families and trickling down to working class families
- this is called the principle of stratified diffusion
20 marker: ann oakley and domestic labour
- interview 40 married women in 1974, to get their opinion on conjugal roles
- only 15% of men ‘highly participate’
- majority of women did not enjoy their housewife role and found it tedious, boring and unfulfilling
- oakley puts this down to early gender socialisation/ canalisation
hardill and power and decision making
found that men still make the important, ‘life changing’, decision
20 marker: pahl and money decisions
- men still made the important family decisions eg. where to live, major financial problems
- women still managed shopping and smaller household bills
- tells us that power is still not important in families
is the new housewife coming back into fashion?
- # tradwife all over social media, people wanting to go back to traditional roles
- can be seen as a demonstration of successful feminism
- women seem to now have a choice if they want to be at the home or work
20 marker: why did girls underachieve in the past?
- differential access: girls had to study a different ciriculum to boys, even if they were not interested. this meant that girls underachieved. girls could go to university in 1887
- patriarchy: canalisation (gender into socialisation) why education girls if there just going to be housewives?
- ideology of romance: girls prioritised getting married and having children
- invisible girls in the classroom: boys dominated, girls are ignored by teachers
- differences in confidence: girls underestimate ability
- hidden ciriculum: suttle sexism and messages eg. reading books, patriarchy taught in schools eg. ‘big strong boys’
20 marker: why has girls achievement now improved?
- equal rights legislation and feminism, women are now seen as role models
- increase in divorce, women cannot depend on their partners, need to be financially independant, canalisation and social attitudes have changed
- coursework, girls do better in coursework, boys do better in exams
- national ciriculum, everyone learns the same thing
- economy has changed, jobs are now more based around teamwork, which targets more women, factories on decline
- media, successful females, role models
20 marker: why are boys underachieving?
- more likely to get excluded
- willis: anti-school subculture
- lack of male role models, more female teachers
- negative role models in the media eg. andrew tate
- boys more likely to be ‘misbehaving’, labelling theory, Becker, female is more likely to be ‘ideal pupil’
- socialisation, girls are more conforming, boys get away with being monstrous
20 marker: mitsos and brown and boys underachievement
- boys are more easily distracted in the classroom, not regarded as macho to work hard, so they ‘play up’ to impress friends. hard-working boys may be accused of being homosexual
- boys overestimate ability and girls underestimate ability
- boys have difficulty organising their time to meet deadlines
20 marker: why do women present more mental health issues?
- canalisation: girls = ‘emotional’, there’s a pressure for boys to act in a certain way, girls are more likely to express, OCD = cleaning (organisation, gender roles). boys = ‘toughen up’ ‘boys dont cry, expectation of strength (toxic masculinity), PTSD and dark side of family, media = portrayol of female characters, dual burden and triple shift, leads to depression, no time for self
20 marker: women as guardians of family health: role of the family
traditional women have tended to take on the responsibility of looking after the health of members of their family as well as themselves. more women than men are their main carer for their children and may care for other dependant family. intensive caring can affect social, emotional and physical health. women are over represented in low income, low status jobs, often part time, more likely to live in poverty than men. physical and sexual abuse of girls = long term impact
20 marker: women as guardians of family health: social support
women’s friendships with other women are more likely to help with mental health, providing a source of support. they are encourage to seek help from family and friends, so more likely to be diagnosed
20 marker: women as guardians of family health: depression
more likely to be experienced by women. women’s increased life expectancy means they are more likely to outlive men and move into residential care. older people are often faced with daily stresses and difficult life events than younger people
20 marker: patriarchy of pregnancy
- birth described as increasingly risky for mothers, made a medick matter with high levels of intervention
- a new spirit of medical enquiry, especially in anatomy and physiology, emphasis on formal training, new form of ‘expertise’
- shift from home to hospital
- changes in ‘culture of childbirth’
20 marker: why don’t women appear on crime statistics?
- sex role theory (socialisation): from infancy, children are socialised that the two sexes are different. This is called canalisation. Female roles contain such elements as caring, passivity and domesticity. male roles, stress elements of toughness, aggression and sexual conquest. it is argued that females generally lack the values that are typically associated with delinquency
20 marker: heidensohn and control theory
- women have lower recored crime, rate and commit fewer serious crimes
- the control theory emphasises how the agencies of social control reduce crime
- the agencies control women more than men because they are headed by men in a patriarchal society
- women’s behaviour is more controlled than men, leaving less opportunity for deviance
- women are controlled and constrained at home, in public and work