social influence Flashcards
(12 cards)
types of conformity
internalisation- line task
identification- conformity took place because the group is values
compliance- conformity only in public, not private beliefs
normative SI- high conformity in ambiguous settings
informational SI- 25% never gave the wrong answer
asch original
line task
high conformity in ambiguous settings (32% of the time)
25% never gave the wrong answer
asch variations
group size- increasing size= more conformity (up to 3 confederates = 32% conformity)
rising from 14% with 2 confederates
unanimity- conformity reduced with a dissenting confederate
task difficulty- increased difficulty = more conformity
zimbardo
prison
21 men
guard or prisoner= random allocation
uniforms
stopped early
milgram
shock experiment
confederate
100% shocked to 300v
65% shocked to 450v
both fatal (if real)
experimenter- ‘the experiment requires you to continue’
84% were happy to participate
milgram variations
proximity- closeness to learner = decreased obedience
same room = 40%
force hand = 30%
phone = 21%
location- seedy office= reduced obedience (65% to 47.5%)
without lab coat = 20%
situational explanations: AS/LoA
agentic state- loss of autonomy and responsibilty for actions
power of position and social hierarchy
legitimacy of authority:
- social hierarchy
- power to punish
- ‘science’
- ‘education’
- uniform = symbol
the authoritarian personality
highly obedient- blindly follows orders
conventional for inferior social status
forms a childhood
harsh upbringing (dad)- strict
conditional worth (love)
high F scale scores
resisting SI:
(SS- social support)
the influence of a dissenter peer or role model
breaks ananimity
milgram:
dissenting peer reduced obedience to 5%
asch:
dissenting peer reduced conformity to 5%
resisting SI: LoC
locus of control
high internal- belief in self-control and freewill
takes responsibilty
high external- little self control and a belief in fate/determinism
blames outside factors
more prone to depression and abnormal behaviours
minority influence
this causes internalisation of minority beliefs
consistency
commitment
flexibility- a non dogmatic approach
snowball effect
social influence and social change
draw attention
consistency
deep processing
augmentation principle= self sacrifice
snowball
socio-crypto-amnesia: forget the origin of change
disobedient models