Social Influence - Types and Explanations for Conformity Flashcards
(20 cards)
What is conformity
A change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagines pressure from a person or group of people
Types of influence
Majority (conformity: Being influenced by the views of a larger group
Minority: Being influenced by the views of a smaller group
Herbert Kelman - Types of conformity
- Compliance
- Identification
- Internalisation
Compliance
- Person conforms publicly with the views or behaviours expressed by others but continues to privately disagree
- Superficial (temporary)
- Shallowest form of conformity
- Doesn’t maintain the views/behaviour when not in the presence of the group
Internalisation
- Person takes on the views expressed by others at a deep, personal level, and they become part of that persons own way of viewing/belief system
- Conforms publicly and privately - internalised the views
- Permanent type of conformity
- Deepest form
Identification
- An individual might accept influence because they want to be associated with another person/group.
- Adopting the group’s attitudes + behaviours, feel more a part of it
- Accepts the attitudes and behaviours they are adopting but the purpose is to be accepted as a member
- Often temporary - only lasts while we identify with that group
Deutsch and Gerald - Two-process theory
- 2 main reasons why people conform:
- Need to be liked (Normative)
- Need to be right (Informational)
Normative social influence
- Based on fear of rejection
- Desire to be liked and accepted
- Often leads to compliance
- Temporary and public changes
Informational social influence
- Based on desire to be correct
- People rely on others for information
- Often leads to internalisation
- Permanent and private changes
Asch’s line experiments - NSI
- Naïve participants gave the wrong answer 36.7% of the time
- 25% of ppts did not conform on any trials, 75% did at least once
- ‘Asch effect’ - extent to which ppts conform even when the situation is non-ambiguous
- Majority of ppts said they conformed to avoid rejection
Perrin and Spencer
- Time-temporal validity
- Carried out Asch’s study 25 years later PPT: engineering, mathematics, chem students
Only 1/396 trials did an observer join the erroneous majority - In 1950’s US was very conservative, conformity to US values expected but lower conformity rates after.
Sherif - ISI
- Used autokinetic effect, still point of light in dark appears to move.
Ppt’s shown a still point of light in the dark + estimated how far it moved, first on their own then in groups - When alone, ppts developed their own stable estimates
- In groups, judgements became closer until a group norm developed
- Ppt’s influenced by estimates of other people
- Supports ISI, low ecological validity (artificial), ambiguous task - no correct answer
Impact of cultures
- Individualistic: Where people prioritise standing out as an individual over fitting in as a group member
- Collectivist: People prioritise group loyalty, belonging, fitting in over standing out as an individual
- Lowest rate of conformity found in Belgian students (14%), highest with Indian teachers in Fiji (58%)
Asch’s variations: Group size
- Conformity tends to increase as the group size increases
- One confederate - 3% conformity
- Two confederates - 13% conformity
- Three or more - 33%
- Little change in conformity once group size reaches 4-5
- 4 = optimal group size for conformity to occur
Asch’s variations - Unanimity
- If one person disagrees with majority: conformity dropped from 37% to 25%
- Having an ally reduces pressure to conform
- One confederate instructed to give correct answer - dropped to 5.5%
- One confederate gave a different incorrect answer - dropped to 9%
- If group’s unanimity is broken, conformity is reduced - behave more independently
Asch’s variations - Task difficulty
- When comparison lines were made more similar in length - harder to judge correct answer
- Conformity increases when we are uncertain - look to others for conformation
- Testing ISI
Evaluating Asch
- Perrin + spencer: repeated study, 1/396 trials conformed - 1950’s conformist time
- Artificial task: ppts knew they were in a study, may have gone along for sake of experiment.
Groups they were in do not represent real life groups - Limited application: only men from US were tested
- Situational: people may want to impress strangers by being right
- Ethics: ppts deceived, thought that the confederates were also ppts
Real-world applications
- Fashion trends
- Political opinions
- Consumer behaviour
- Classroom dynamics
Positive + negative aspects of conformity
Positive:
- Maintaining social norms
- Promoting social cohesion
- Efficiency in decision-making
- Learning from other’s expertise
Negative:
- Suppression of individuality
- Potential for groupthink
- Ignoring personal beliefs or values
- Perpetuating harmful practices
Resisting conformity
- Be aware of social influence
- Develop critical thinking skills
- Express dissenting opinions respectfully
- Seek diverse perspectives