Social policy in education Flashcards
(35 cards)
What was the Tripartite System (1944)?
The Tripartite System was introduced by the 1944 Education Act to provide free, state-funded secondary education for all.
Why was the tripartite system introduced?
It aimed to allocate students to one of three types of school (grammar, secondary modern, or technical) based on ability, measured by the 11+ exam.
What were the three types of schools in the Tripartite System?
Grammar schools
Secondary modern
Technical schools
What did grammar schools focus on?
For academically able students; focused on academic curriculum for university.
What did secondary modern schools focus on?
For less academic students; focused on practical and vocational skills.
What did techncal schools focus on?
For students with technical or mechanical ability; focused on scientific and engineering education
What are the criticisms of the tripartite system?
Reinforced class inequality
middle-class students were more likely to pass the 11+ and attend grammar schools, while working-class students were often sent to secondary moderns with fewer opportunities.
Promoted gender inequality, as girls often had to achieve higher marks than boys to enter grammar schools.
What are Comprehensive Schools?
Comprehensive schools were introduced to replace the Tripartite System and provide a non-selective education for all children, regardless of ability or background.
Why were comprahensive schools introduced?
Introduced in 1965
They aimed to promote equality of opportunity and reduce class divisions created by the 11+ exam.
How do Comprehensive Schools differ from schools in the Tripartite System?
Comprehensive schools do not select students based on academic ability — all students attend the same local school.
Unlike the Tripartite System (which divided children at age 11), comprehensives mix all abilities together and offer a broad curriculum.
What is a major criticism of Comprehensive Schools?
Comprehensive schools can still reproduce class inequalities because of streaming
Schools in middle-class areas often have better funding, resources, and exam results.
Marxists argue that they still benefit the middle class more than the working class.
What was the 1988 Education Reform Act?
Introduced by the Conservative government to raise standards in schools by introducing marketisation and parental choice
Why was the 1988 reform act introduced?
It aimed to create an “education market” where schools competed for pupils to drive up quality.
What were the key features of the 1988 Education Reform Act?
National Curriculum: all students study the same core subjects.
Standardised Testing: SATs and GCSEs to measure performance.
League Tables: schools ranked based on exam results.
Open Enrolment: parents could choose schools, not just accept local options.
Formula Funding: schools received money based on the number of pupils they attracted.
What is a major criticism of the 1988 Education Reform Act?
Increased inequality because middle-class parents could use parental choice to access the best schools (“parentocracy”).
Meanwhile, working-class families often lacked the same opportunities, reinforcing class divisions.
Also, teaching to the test became more common due to league table pressures.
What is vocational education?
Education and training that prepares students for specific jobs, careers, or trades, rather than focusing purely on academic knowledge. It links education to the needs of the economy by teaching practical and work-related skills.
Give examples of vocational education programmes.
BTECs
T-Levels
Apprenticeships
Work experience placements during secondary school
Youth Training Schemes introduced in the 1980s
What is a major criticism of vocational education?
Critics argue vocational education can be seen as lower status than academic routes and often channels working-class students into low-paid, low-skilled jobs, reinforcing social class inequality.
Marxists claim it serves capitalist interests by producing a docile, obedient workforce rather than promoting true educational equality.
What were the aims of New Labour’s education policies (1997–2010)?
improve standards
increase diversity and choice,
reduce educational inequality, especially for disadvantaged students.
Give examples of New Labour policies designed to reduce inequality.
Education Action Zones (EAZs): extra funding to schools in deprived areas.
Aim Higher programme: encouraged working-class students to apply to university.
EMA: £30 a week paid to low-income students to stay in education post-16.
Sure Start Centres: early years support for disadvantaged families
Increased funding for state schools and smaller class sizes.
What is a major criticism of New Labour’s education policies?
Critics argue New Labour still promoted marketisation which can increase inequality.
Marxists claim policies like EMA only masked deeper class divisions without removing them.
Also, middle-class families continued to benefit more from choice and competition in education.
What were the aims of the Coalition Government’s education policies (2010–2015)?
The Coalition Government (Conservatives and Liberal Democrats) aimed to extend marketisation, increase competition between schools, raise standards, and reduce government control over education.
Give examples of marketisation policies introduced by the Coalition Government.
Expansion of Academies: all schools encouraged to become academies, free from local authority control.
Introduction of Free Schools: new schools set up by parents, charities, or businesses, funded by the government but independently run.
Pupil Premium: extra funding for schools based on the number of disadvantaged students (to help reduce inequality).
Reforms to Exams: tougher GCSEs and A-levels to raise standards.
More league tables and focus on “parental choice”.
What is a major criticism of the Coalition Government’s marketisation policies?
Critics argue these policies widened educational inequality, as better-off families could take greater advantage of school choice (e.g., moving near good schools).
Free schools and academies often benefited middle-class areas more than deprived ones.
Marxists say marketisation turns education into a consumer good rather than a public service.