Spine (Complete) Flashcards
What is the ASIA spinal cord injury scale?
Asia A: Complete
- No motor or sensory function preserved in sacral elements
Asia B: Incomplete
- Sensory but not motor function preserved below neurological level
Asia C: Incomplete
- Greater than half the muscles below affected level are < antigravity power (<3/5)
Asia D: Incomplete
- Greater than half the muscles below affected level are > antigravity (>3/5)
Asia E: Normal

How do you determine the ASIA classification in a spinal cord injury?
- Determine if patient is in spinal shock
* Check bulbocavernosus reflex - Determine neurologic level of injury
- Lowest segment with intact sensation and antigravity (3 or more) muscle function strength
- In regions where there is no myotome to test, the motor level is presumed to be the same as the sensory level
- Determine whether the injury is COMPLETE or INCOMPLETE
- COMPLETE defined as: (ASIA A)
- No voluntary anal contraction (sacral sparing) AND
- 0/5 distal motor AND
- 0/2 distal sensory scores (no perianal sensation) AND
- bulbocavernosus reflex present (patient not in spinal shock)
- INCOMPLETE defined as:
- Voluntary anal contraction (sacral sparing) OR
- Sacral sparing critical to determine complete vs. incomplete
- Palpable or visible muscle contraction below injury level OR
- Perianal sensation present
- Voluntary anal contraction (sacral sparing) OR

What cervical spine radiographic parameters should be assessed on plain film xrays?
- Occipitocervical junction
- Harris rule of 12
- Basion-dens interval or basion-posterior axial interval >12 suggests occipitocervical dissociation
- Power’s ratio
- Powers ratio = C-D/A-B
- C-D: distance from basion to posterior arch
- A-B: distance from anterior arch to opisthion
- Ratio ~ 1 is normal
- If > 1.0 concern for anterior dislocation
- Ratio < 1.0 raises concern for:
- Powers ratio = C-D/A-B
- Posterior atlanto-occipital dislocation
- Odontoid fractures
- Ring of atlas fractures
- Atlantoaxial junction
- ADI
- > 3.5mm considered unstable
- > 10mm indicates surgery in RA
- PADI/SAC
- <14mm indicates surgery in RA
- Lateral ADI
- 1-2mm of asymmetry of lateral mass alignment relative to dens may be normal
- Combined lateral mass overhang
- >8.1mm indicates transverse ligament rupture and unstable injury
- Subaxial spine
- >8.1mm indicates transverse ligament rupture and unstable injury
- Anterior vertebral line
- Posterior vertebral line
- Spinolaminar line
- Prevertebral soft tissue shadow
- >6mm at C2, >22mm at C6 = abnormal
- Interspinous distance
- Stacked parallelogram facets

What is the classification of occipital condyle fractures?
Anderson and Montesano Classification
- Type I - comminuted (3%)
- MOI = axial load
- Stable injury
- Type II - basilar skull fracture extending into the occipital condyle (22%)
- MOI = shear injury
- Stable injury
- Type III - transverse avulsion fracture (75%)
- MOI = forced rotation with lateral bending (alar ligament avulsion)
- Potentially unstable (associated with craniocervical dissociation)

What cranial nerve palsies may develop in association of occipital condyle fractures?
CN IX, X, XI
- travel in jugular foramen adjacent to occipital condyle
What is the management of occipital condyle fractures?
- Type I and II = external immobilization (cervical orthosis)
- Type III = depends on if associated with craniocervical dissociation or ligamentous instability
- Stable = external immobilization (cervical orthosis)
- Unstable = occipitocervical fusion
- C0-C2(or C3) instrumentation and fusion

What are the two main presentations of occipitocervical instability?
[Orthobullets]
- Traumatic – often fatal
- Acquired – often associated with Down’s syndrome
What are the radiographic parameters to be assessed on plain film for craniocervical dissociation?
[JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
- Harris lines (Harris rule of 12s)
- Basion-dens interval
- Normal = <12mm
- Distance from basion to tip of dens
- Basion-axis interval
- Normal = 4-12mm
- Distance between line parallel to posterior cortex of C2 and basion
- Powers ratio [Orthobullets]
- Distance from basion to posterior arch C1/distance from opisthion to anterior arch C1
- Normal = 1
- >1 = anterior dislocation
- <1 = posterior dislocation, dens fracture, ring of atlas fracture
- Wackenheim line
- Line parallel along the posterior portion of the clivus to the upper cervical spine
- Normal = tip of dens is <1-2mm from Wackenheim line

What is the classification system for occiptocervical instability based on direction of displacement?
[Orthobullets]
Traynelis Classification
- Type 1 - Anterior occiput dislocation
- Type 2 - Longitudinal dislocation
- Type 3 - Posterior occiput dislocation
What is the classification system for occipitocervical instability based on degree of instability?
[JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
Harbourview Classification
- Stage I - minimal or nondisplaced (STABLE)
- Often unilateral injury to the craniocervical ligaments
- Treatment:
- External immobilization
- Stage II - minimally displaced (STABLE or UNSTABLE)
- MRI indicates significant soft tissue injury (does not indicate instability)
- Proceed with traction test
- Provocative traction fluoroscopy
- Technique – patient supine with lateral fluoro view centred at C1, Gardner Wells tongs are applied and 5lbs are added (repeat fluoro) then increased to 10lbs (repeat fluoro)
- Positive traction test = Fracture displacement >2mm, atlanto-occipital distraction >2mm, or atlantoaxial distraction >3 mm indicates CCJ instability
- Treatment
- Stable = external immobilization
- Unstable = occipitocervical fusion (C0-C2 or C3)
- MRI indicates significant soft tissue injury (does not indicate instability)
- Stage III – gross craniocervical misalignment
- BAI or BDI >2mm above upper limit of normal
- Usually fatal
- Treatment:
- Occipitocervical fusion (C0-C2 or C3)

What are the radiographic parameters to assess for atlas fractures?
[JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
- Atlanto-dens interval (ADI)
- Distance between anterior dens and posterior aspect of anterior arch of C1
- Normal = <3mm in adults
- >3mm indicates transverse ligament disruption and C1-C2 instability
- Lateral atlanto-dens interval
- Distance between the lateral surface of the dens and the medial surface of the lateral mass of C1
- Normal = <2mm of asymmetry
- Combined lateral mass overhang
- Combined horizontal distance from lateral border of C1 to lateral border of C2 on open mouth radiographs or coronal CT
- Normal = <7mm
- >7mm indicates transverse ligament rupture and C1-C2 instability

What is the classification system for atlas (C1) fractures?
[Orthobullets]
Landells Classification
- Type I - isolated anterior or posterior arch fracture
- Type II - Jefferson burst fracture (bilateral anterior and posterior arch fractures)
- Type III - unilateral lateral mass fracture

What is the classification system for transverse ligament injuries?
[Orthobullets]
Dickman classification
- Type I - intrasubstance tear
- Type II - bony avulsion from tubercle at lateral mass of C1
What is the treatment of atlas (C1) fractures?
[JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
Depends on the integrity of transverse ligament injury
- If stable (ligament intact):
- Based on ADI <3, lateral ADI <2mm of asymmetry, combined lateral mass overhang <7mm
- External immobilization (halo or hard cervical orthosis)
- If unstable (ligament disrupted)
- Posterior C1-C2 fusion
- C1 lateral mass screw, C2 pars or pedicle
- Occipitocervical fusion
- If C1 lateral mass purchase inadequate due to comminution
- Posterior C1-C2 fusion

What are the radiographic parameters to assess for atlantoaxial instability?
- Atlanto-dens interval
* Normal <3mm in adults (<5mm in children) - Space available for the cord – SAC (posterior atlantodens interval – PADI)
* Normal >13mm
What is the classification and treatment of atlantoaxial instability?
[JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
Type A
- Rotationally displaced in the transverse plane (transverse ligament intact)
- Often nontraumatic
- Treatment – reduction and immobilization
Type B
- Translation between C1-C2 (Unstable)
- Transverse ligament disrupted
- Treatment:
- Type I transverse ligament disruption = C1-C2 fusion
- Type II transverse ligament bony avulsion = posterior C1-C2 fusion or halo immobilization following traction
Type C
- Distraction between C1-C2 (vertically unstable)
- Similar to craniocervical dissociation and often associated with it
- Treatment:
- C1-C2 fusion
- C0-C2 fusion if associated with craniocervical dissociation

What is the classification system for Odontoid fractures?
[JAAOS 2010;18:383-394]
- Anderson and D’Alonzo Classification
- Type I - odontoid tip fracture
- Oblique fracture due to bony avulsion of the alar ligament
- Type II - base of the dens fracture
- Does not involve the C2 superior articular facet
- High non-union rate due to watershed area
- Type III – C2 body fracture
- Does involve the C2 superior articular facet
- Grauer modification
- Type IIA - transverse fracture, <1mm displacement
- Type IIB- oblique fracture extending from anterosuperior to posteroinferior
- Type IIC- oblique fracture extending from anteroinferior to posterosuperior
- May be associated with significant anterior comminution

What is the treatment based on odontoid fracture type?
[JAAOS 2010;18:383-394]
- Type I
- Stable fractures (at least one alar ligament and the transverse ligament is intact)
- Cervical collar
- Unstable fractures (associated craniocervical dissociation)
- Posterior C0-C2 fusion
- Type II
- Young patient
- No risk factors for nonunion = halo immobilization
- Risk factors for nonunion = surgery
- Elderly patient
- Surgical candidate = surgical stabilization
- Posterior C1-C2 fusion
- Not surgical candidate = cervical orthosis
- Results in fibrous union in most cases
- Halo vest is associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality in elderly
3. Type III
- Surgical candidate = surgical stabilization
- Cervical orthosis

What are the risk factors for nonunion of odontoid fractures?
[JAAOS 2010;18:383-394]
- Age >40
- Posterior displacement >5mm
- Angulation >11°
- Comminution
- Fracture gap >1mm
- Delay in treatment (4 day delay)
- Concomitant neurological injury
What are the surgical options for odontoid fractures?
[JAAOS 2010;18:383-394]
- Anterior fixation (odontoid screw)
- Anatomic reduction and one or two partially threaded screws under biplanar fluoroscopy
- Indications:
- Grauer type IIb
- Contraindications:
- Osteoporosis, comminution, reverse obliquity (type IIc), short neck, barrel chest, nonunion
- Posterior C1-C2 fusion
- C1 lateral mass, C2 pars or pedicle
- Indications:
- Odontoid screw contraindicated
What is the classification for traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis (Hangman’s Fracture)?
Levine and Edwards Classification
- Type I
- Minimally displaced pars interarticularis fracture
- Translation <3mm of C2, no angulation
- MOI = axial load and hyperextension
- Type Ia
- Oblique fracture through one pars interarticularis and anterior to the pars within the body of the contralateral side (unstable)
- Type II
- Translation >3mm of C2
- MOI – axial load and hyperextension followed by flexion
- Type IIa
- Angulation (kyphosis) more than translation
- MOI = flexion-distraction
- Type III
- Similar pars fracture as type I plus C2/C3 facet dislocation
- MOI = flexion distraction followed by hyperextension
- ***Note: hyperextension causes the pars fracture and flexion causes PLL and disc rupture

What is the treatment of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis (Hangman’s Fracture)?
[JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
Type I - hard cervical orthosis (12 weeks)
Type Ia - halo immobilization
Type II - halo immobilization (12 weeks)
Type IIa
- C2-C3 ACDF or posterior fixation [JAAOS 2014;22:718-729]
- Reduction with gentle axial load + hyperextension, then compression halo immobilization for 6-12 weeks [Orthobullets]
Type III - posterior reduction and stabilization
- C2-C3 or C1-C3 fusion

What defines the subaxial cervical spine?
C3-C7
What is the classification system for subaxial cervical spine trauma?
- Allen and Ferguson
- 6 classes based on mechanism of injury and static radiographs (used in research)
- Flexion-compression, vertical compression, flexion-distraction, extension-compression, extension-distraction, lateral flexion
- Subaxial Injury Classification System (SLIC)
- Three components
- Morphology
- Integrity of the discoligamentous complex
- Neurological status
- Score dictates treatment
- <4 = conservative treatment
- 4 = treatment at discretion of surgeon
- >4 = surgical treatment





















