Test Flashcards
(54 cards)
What society defines as right and wrong forms the basis from which laws and policies are developed
The law persuades ethical behavior
Why the study of ethics in CJ are important
How is the duty to act unethical
“Code of Silence”
Intervene in a violent encounter
Three Context of Understanding crime and ethics
Personal
Social
Criminal Justice Context
Represents how YOU see the world, formed by own personal experiences
Personal context
Examines the environment we live in and the people with whom we interact
Gives us an understanding of the environments that encourage criminals
Social Context
Sets legal limits for what we can do to each other and the consequences
CJ context
Use of Force and Coercion is central to criminal justice
Decisions on: whether to use force, how much force, and under what conditions
Society places trust in police officers
Factors that distinguish CJ from other disciplines
Investigates where our ethcal principles come from and what they mean
Metaethics
examines specific controversial issues (abortion, death penalty)
Applied ethics
examines moral standards that regulate right and wrong conduct
Normative ethics
Consequentialist ethical theory
Killing, lying, cheating, stealing are morally wrong because they produce bad consequences
Charity, benevolence, honesty are morally good
Utilitarianism
Finds fault with consequentialism
Point out that sometimes humans have a duty or obligation to perform, regardless of the consequences
Deontology
Teacher must fail underperforming student, though this causes unhappiness for both the student and the teache
Example of Deontology
Thief steals a TV from a home
Produces happiness for the thief but unhappiness for the victim, the community, and the officers investigating, therefore the majority is unhappy so it is morally wrong
Example of Utilitarianism
(18th century) The key to morality is…good will or INTENTION not consequences
Fundamental principle is Categorical Imperative
(18th century) The key to morality is…good will or INTENTION not consequences
Fundamental principle is Categorical Imperative
– for act to be moral, you must be willing to permit everyone else to do the same in similar circumstances; you cannot be an exception
Universalizability
One formulation of the categorical imperative
Treat people with respect and reverence, and not just as things
Cannot treat each other as “means” for our “ends”
Intrinsic Values
One formulation of the categorical imperative
Affiliated with utilitarianism
All humans desire happiness and everything is a part of or a means to happiness
John stuart Mill
Sometimes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people is a result of a morally indefensible action
Concern with utilitarianism
Does not provide guidance where this is conflicting duty
Concern with deontology
Differences among beliefs, laws, morals, customs and other characteristics that set large groups apart
Culture
Values and beliefs that set a group apart from the larger culture in which they exist
subculture
Enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence is personally or socially preferable
Value
An enduring organization of beliefs concerning preferable modes of conduct or end states of existence along a continuum of relative importance
Value system