The contract of employment Flashcards

(68 cards)

1
Q

Written statement of terms

A

ERA 1996 s1 once worked for one month a written statement of terms must be provided with 2 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Written statement of terms from April 2020

A

S1 statement to be provided on day one of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is contained in a written statement

A

Date of commencement inc any prev employment and continuous employment salary amount and payment info, hours of work/holiday/sick/pension/notice, Job title/description. Place of work, term if not permanent, collective agreements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

is a S1 statement the contract for employemet

A

no - but is evidence of the terms of an employment contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Changes to S1 statement

A

S4 era any changes must be made and new statement given at the earliest opportunity and no later then one month after the change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

if st 1 not corrected

A

both parties could be at a disadvantage as neither can deny that the terms are accurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S1 case law

A

Glitz v Watford electric 1979

Martin V Solus Schall 1979

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Type of terms

A

Express

Implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Express Terms

A

Written into the contract and override implied terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Implied terms

A

Not written - presumed intentions of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Implied terms tests

A

Business efficacy, Officious bystander, Status approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Business efficacy case law

A

The Moorcock 1889 (rarely used)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Officious bystander case law

A
  • shirlaw v southern foundries 1939
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Status approach

A

court will imply terms if they appear reasonable in the circumstance - Bank v Akhtar 1989, Judge V Crown Leisure 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conflict between Express and Implied terms

A

Normally express terms take precedence unless they conflict with tort duties such as duty of care - Johnstone V Bloomsbury Heath 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conflict cases

A

Johnstone V Bloomsbury 1991 (f)

Reda V Flag 2002 (a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Collective agreements

A

S 178 Trade union and labor relations Act 1992- contract can not be silent but separate from the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Incorporation by conduct or custom

A

if parties act on the basis of a collective agreement it becomes incorporated into contacts regardless if the individual is part of the union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Incorporation Case law

A

Singh v British Steel 1974
Dunlop Tyres V Blows and others 2001
Henry and other V London General Transport 2001 - established changes binding on union members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Express Incorporation

A

collective agreements only become enforceable when incorporated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Express incorporation Caselaw

A

National coal board V Galley 1958 (F)

Singh V British Steel 1974 (F)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Work Rules

A

ie Handbook can be binding - keeley v fosroc international 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Custom

A

widespread - more than a one off - can become part of the main terms is is custom, Employee must know about it.
Has management drawn the policy to the attention of the staff,
Has the policy been followed without exception for a substantial period
Did the employees have a genuine expectation that the policy would be applied to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Custom Case law

A

Quinn V Calder Industrial 1996 (F)

Meek V Port of London 1918(A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Implied Duties of Employers
Provide work, Wages, Reasonable care, mutual trust and confidence, Proper information, Accurate refereances
26
Provision of work
No duty to provide work Collier V Sunday Referee publishing 1940
27
Provision of work exceptions
when employing a skilled person you are bound to provide with work Failure causes loss of reputation/publicity, Failure leads to reduction in actual/potential earnings
28
Pay Wages
Although no implied duty to provide work there is an implied duty to provide wages providing-the employee is ready and wiling to work and there is no express contractual term
29
Pay wages case law
way V latilla 1937 - no express term | Beveridge V KLM Uk Ltd - Express term
30
Reasonable Care
Safe operating system of work Safe Tools/Plant/Materials Adequate supervision Trained and efficient personnel
31
Safe operating system of work
adequate warnings, provide safety equipment, Not cause foreseeable danger
32
Safe Tools/Plant/Materials
Tools/plant/materials must be safe/maintained and inspected periodically
33
Adequate supervision
conduct of the reasonable and prudent employer, positive thought for safety of workers in light of what is known/ought to be known
34
Trained and efficient personnel
if person injured by the joke of another can be liable if employer knew the responsible person was prone to such horseplay
35
Safe operating system of work case law
Thompson V smith ship repairs 1984 (NIHL) Pape V cumbria CC 1991 Johnstone V Bloombury HA 1991
36
Safe Tools/Plant/Materials case law
Bradford V Robinson Rentals 1958 Davie V new Meryon Board Mills 1959 Woods v Durable Suites 1953 Crookall V Vickers Armstrong 1955
37
Adequate supervision case law
Barber V Somerset CC 2004
38
Trained and efficient personnel case law
Hudson V Ridge Manufacturing 1957 Smith V Crossley Bros 1951 McCready V Securicor 1992 Heath & Safety at work Act 1974
39
Mutual Trust and confidence
Trust between employer and employee
40
Mutual Trust and confidence case law
Malik and another V Credit and commerce international 1997 Morrow V Safeway Stores 2002 Ogilvie V Neyrfor Weir 2003 GMB trade Union V Brown 2007
41
Provide proper infomation
employers owe a duty to keep employees informed about changes, such as pensions or other changes to the employment relationship
42
Provide proper information case law
scally V Southern Heath and social services board 1991 | HRA 1998 - right to private life
43
References
No duty to provide a reference but must be acurate, Failure to provide under protected characteristics
44
References Case law - protected characteristic
Coote V Granada Hospitality Ltd 1999
45
References Case law- inacurate
Spring V Guardian Assurance plc V Others 1994 | Harris V TSB 2000
46
Implied duties of employees
Obedience Personal service Reasonable care Good Faith/Fidelity
47
Obediance
Reasonable orders within scope of contract
48
Obedience case law
Pepper V Webb 1969 | Wilson V Racher 1974
49
Obedience case law - unlawful orders
Morrish V Henlys 1973
50
Obedience case law - outside scope
O'brien V Associated fire alarms 1969
51
Personal service
Be ready and willing to work - exc sickness | Illegal strike action breaches
52
Reasonable care
if employee acts negligently , Employee must take reasonable care of property
53
Reasonable care case law
Lister V Romford Ice & Cold storage 1957 | Superflex V Plaisted 1958
54
Good Faith and fidelity
act in best interests of the company, non compete, non disclosure
55
Not to disrupt employers business interest
going on strike/go slows
56
Not to disrupt employers business interest - case law
ticehurst V BT 1992
57
Work to Rule
not always classed as ind action
58
Work to rule case law
secretary state for employment v ASLEF (2) 1972 | Burgess and other V Stevedoring Services 2002
59
Duty not to compete
can't stop employees from having another job but can stop competetion risk of divulging trade secrets
60
Duty not to compete case law
hivac V park royal scientific instruments 1946
61
Confidential Infomation
protect employer from employees use of trade secrets - implied duty of good faith
62
Confidential Info during employment- case law
Robb V Green 1895 United Sterling corp V Mannion 1974 marshall V Industrial Systems and control 1992
63
Confidential info after employment - case law
faccenda Chicken v Fowler 1986
64
Inventions and patents
unless expressly written all inventions belong to the employer unless not sole reason for employment or incidental value
65
Inventions and patents case law
British Syphon company v homewood 1956 | Patents act 1977
66
Duty to disclose
employee has a duty to disclose information of benefit or detriment (if public interest unless in malice)
67
Duty to account
must account for all money and property during employment
68
Duty to account case law
``` boston deep sea fishing V ansell 1888 item software v fassihi and others 2005 tesco v Pook and others 2004 nottingham uni v fishel 2020 Bribery act 2010 ```