The Role Of The Scientific Community Flashcards

(13 cards)

1
Q

7 sections of report (reporting psychological investigations)

A
  1. Abstract
  2. Intro
  3. Method
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Appendix
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Abstract is a ..

A

Brief overview of the participants and procedures of the study as well as results and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intro is an..

A

Overview of previous research and studies, aims and hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method is the..

A

Detailed description of what the researcher did, enough description so another researcher could replicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Results are..

A

Details about what the researcher found, either qualitative/quantative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Discussion is..

A

What the researcher concludes from their findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

References are..

A

Full titles and detail of all the journals and book references in the text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Appendix is..

A

End of the paper and contains info that is too big/distracting to have in the main body of the paper e.g. full questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are peers in peer review?

A

Experts in the specific field of your research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The peer review process:

Scientists __ something

__ about their results

__ __ receives an __ and sends it for peer review

Peer reviews read the article and __ __ to __

Editor may send __ __ to the __ who may __ and __

If article meets editorial and peer standards it is __

A

Scientists study something

Write about their results

Journal editor receives an article and sends it for peer review

Peer reviews read the article and provide feedback to editor

Editor may send reviewer recommendations to the scientists who may revise and resubmit

If article meets editorial and peer standards it is published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Allocation of research funding

A

Paid for by various government and charitable bodies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strengths of peer review

A

Published work is validated for accuracy/validity

Peers suggest improvements and allocate further funding

Any problem areas/weaknesses/suggestions for improvement are highlighted as necessary

Upholds the principles of science- prevents scientific fraud

Adds credibility to the research and the field of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weaknesses of peer review

A

Takes time (average 180 days) - delays publication

Peers bring their own bias

Hard to find other experts

Conflicts of interest

Publication bias ( positive findings that find a difference are more likely to be published over negative findings where no difference was shown )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly