THEORY - Class Flashcards
MARXISM - Karl Marx
There is a class conflict in which the proletariat are exploited by the bourgeoisie, creating a ‘reproduction of inequality’. Capitalism is the root of this problem as it promotes: polarisation of social classes, alienation, and economic crisis.
MARXISM - Bowles and Gintis (could be critical of functional uniqueness).
They argue that meritocracy is a myth and your family class background is more of a predictor then your talent or skill.
NEO-MARXISM - Gramsci (Hegemony)
The ruling class use ideological control as a form of class domination. Hegemony is an invisible mechanism and the ruling class’s ideas permeate the whole of society, i.e., they are unquestioned and become normalised through constant exposure.
NEO-MARXISM - Gramsci (Counter hegemony)
Gramsci did not believe that hegemony goes unchallenged. Gramsci called this ‘counter-hegemony’, whereby in some societies (such as in the West) ruling class ideology is questioned. For example, this could occur after a recession, which leads to high levels of unemployment - leads to industrial action / strikes and riots (eg, the london riots in 2011).
NEO-MARXISTS - Westergaard and Resler
Argued that there was little evidence of class divisions in British society disappearing and suggested that such inequalities could only be understood as the result of the way that the capitalist system operates. Divisions have actually grown since 1970.
NEO-MARXISM - Braverman
Argues that many so-called ‘middle class workers’ have in reality been de-skilled. For example the skills of clerical workers and even professionals have been programmed into machines or broken down into simple tasks that can be preformed by less skilled workers. This reduces the control such workers have over work processes and also means that employers can pay them lower wage.
MARXISM (Ao3) 1
Marxists are criticised for being too deterministic. This means that they think that individuals do not have much free will, instead they are controlled by external forces. In this case, the proletariat act like robots and simply accept their unequal position.
MARXISM (Ao3) 2
Marxist ideas are dated. Marx was writing in the 1800s when monarchies were in control, even Neo-Marxists such as Gramsci was writing in the early 1900s. According to the OECD, the middle income group is 55% (the largest class group). This group enjoy very comfortable lives. This is different to the inequalities of the 1800s and early 1900s.
MARXISM (Ao3) 3
The New Right argue that the welfare system has been very generous for the underclass and that they enjoy many housing and income benefits.
MARXISM (Ao3) 4
Another reason why Marxism is considered out of date is because technology and globalisation has advanced rapidly. This means that most in the western world enjoy the many benefits of technology at a relatively cheap price. The internet has also offered many economic opportunities for those in lower social classes. Moreover, globalisation has allowed workers to migrate more easily to enjoy the economic benefits of working in countries other than their home country.
MARXISM AO3 - Weber
Weber criticised Marx for failing to explain the status differences that exist within social class strata. For example, within the upper class, ‘old wealth’ such as that symbolised by the Royal Family and the aristocracy seems to have more status than ‘new wealth’ symbolised by owners of companies or wealthy celebrities.
Within the middle-classes, there exist status differences between the upper middle-class, the professional and managerial middle-classes and white-collar workers
Within the working-class, there are status differences between the ‘labour aristocracy’, (i.e. skilled well paid workers), those who are semi-skilled and unskilled but in work and those who are long-term unemployed and dependent on benefits.
WEBERIAN - Max Weber
Max Weber (2012) paints a more complex picture of social stratification than Marx. Weber saw society stratified in 3 main ways: social class, status, and power. He focused on how each of these affect our ‘life chances’. The class system should be divided by:
Property owners (owners of companies and properties),
Professionals (e.g. doctors, lawyers, engineers, judges, accountants, consultants,)
Petty bourgeoisie (e.g. shopkeepers, independent contractors),
Working class (e.g. factory workers, cleaners, delivery drivers, retail assistants).
WEBERIAN + MARXIST CONNECTION - Bourdieu
Influenced by Weberianism, Bourdieu argues that the lower classes suffer from a lack of capital (social, economic, and cultural) which means that they don’t have a ‘leg up’ in advancing in society. Socialization plays a huge part in a persons life chances.
WEBERIANISM Ao3 - Marxists
Marxists argue that focusing on multiple social classes and different dimensions of inequality obscures the fundamental importance of class divisions in capitalist societies. Marxists argue that status distinctions within the working class are often encouraged as a means of ‘divide and rule’ by the ruling class, and that the really important political struggles are linked to the class struggles and conflicts over economic interests.
FUNCTIONALIST quote - Davis-Moore
“Inequality is not only inevitable but also necessary for the smooth functioning of society” - Davis-Moore
FUNCTIONALISM - Davis and Moore 1
Western Society is a meritocracy where social mobility is common.
Social class stratification is a good thing because class societies are meritocracies - high rewards motivate people to perform.
FUNCTIONALISM - Davis and Moore 2 (Role allocation)
Role allocation - education sifts and sorts students into the careers that best fit their ability and interests. All UK students can take GCSE and A Level exams at no cost. Examiners are neutral and anyone can achieve if they are good enough.
FUNCTIONALISM - Davis and Moore 3 (Functional uniqueness)
Society requires the most suitable individuals for certain jobs. Anyone could be a cleaner but not everyone can be a surgeon, these people must be more qualified and therefore there must be a natural hierarchy built in the system.
FUNCTIONALISM Ao3 - Tumin’s criticisms of Davis and Moore
- Is it possible to decide the relative importance of each occupation? (Which positions are the most important is a matter of opinion rather then fact.
- Is there a consensus about reward? (Arguably there is considerable conflict and resentment about the unequal distribution of rewards such as incomes).
- Does pay simply reflect power rather than ability and intelligence? (The high pay of jobs such as business executives reflects their power rather then agreement among the rest of society that they deserve it).
- Is training really a sacrifice and deserving of higher pay? (Going to university is a fun experience rather than a sacrifice don’t you think?)
- Davis and Moore seem to think that we all motivated by monetary reward. Is this true?
- Does capitalist society run as smoothly as Davis + Moore argue?
FUNCTIONALISM - Parsons
People have to work hard + strive for success, therefore, surely those who do deserve the highest rewards? (eg, Alan Sugar).
FUNCTIONALISM- Durkheim
Has some agreement with Marxists “The more unequal distribution of wealth, the more UNSTABLE the society.” + “Capitalism can lead to inequality, alienation, and ANOMIE.”
BUT - “Inequality is the price we pay for progress.”
“The degree of inequality that can be tolerated in a society depends on the degree of social solidarity.”
(eg, to have people such as Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Dyson there must also be people left behind. Someone must fill in the role of cleaners shop workers who need to fill in the gaps of lower paying jobs that people do not necessarily want to do but are needed.)
(eg, The trickle down effect of economics also takes place, as when people at the top of firms and businesses gain more money, it gives them the resources to pay those that work for them more.Things like the welfare state and free health care are provided by the government to help support those in lesser financial situations and help create a sense of social solidarity in society.)
FUNCTIONALISM Ao3 - Marxist criticism
Marxists are deeply critical of the functionalist argument:
- Meritocracy is a myth - think of the many advantages those from higher social classes enjoy
Social mobility is nowhere as prevalent as functionalists argue.
- There are many obstacles in the way of those from lower social classes from rising up the social classes eg, labelling in school, disengaged parents, less school equipment, self fulfilling prophecy, false class consciousness.
FUNCTIONALISM Ao3 - Social mobility
Functionalists argue that UK society is a meritocracy where social mobility is common BUT the evidence on the right suggests that this is NOT the case.
(eg, 77% of the richest 20% of the population apply to uni and get in compared to only that of the 49% of the 20% poorest population).
(24% of vice-chancellors, 32% of MPs, 51% of top Medics, 54% of FTSE-100 chief execs, 54% of top journalists, 70% of High Court judges …went to private school, though only 7% of the population do).
(Education is an engine of social mobility. But achievement is not balanced fairly - for the poorest fifth in society, 46% have mothers with no qualifications at all. For the richest, it’s only 3%)
FUNCTIONALIST Ao3 - Feminism
Feminists argue that:
- The value consensus is a myth, the dominant values in society reflect the patriarchy.
- Meritocracy is often questioned because it is men who dominate the top jobs.
- Role allocation is not considered to be a perfect system as Davis and Moore seem to argue. Instead, feminists argue that women are ‘sifted and sorted’ into traditional ‘feminine’ roles, whilst men are socialised to target the highest status roles.