Topic 2: The Causes of the American Revolution Flashcards
All needed to know about the causes of the American Revolution. (32 cards)
What were the benefits of the Seven Years’ War? [3]
<ul><li><span>The </span><span>Treaty of Paris</span><span> gave </span><span>Britain control over Canada,</span><span> including the 80,000 French-Canadians living there.<br></br></span></li><li><span>The French defeat effectively </span><span>wiped them off the American map</span> <span>and removed most of their influence on the continent.<br></br></span></li><li><span>The colonists</span><span> now (SO THEY BELIEVED) had more land to expand on and prosper from.<br></br></span></li><li><span>There was</span><span> no more fear </span><span>of </span><span>French oppression</span><span> from the colonists.</span></li></ul>
What were the drawbacks of the Seven Years’ War? [3]
- The war created tremendous debt, DOUBLING the British National Debt.
- By 1763 it cost £4.4mn, with an £8mn govt. income
- Britain was trying to avoid hostilities between the Native Americans, which expanding westward would have caused.
- The British now needed to station troops in the colonies to prevent further hostilities between the Natives, which they wanted to make colonists fund.
- This led to an increase from an already high £350,000 spent on colonial defences by 1763
- This made colonists frustrated and to some extent intimidated or anxious of British military presence in the colonies.
Which British PM decided to station troops in the colonies? How many did he station in the colonies? [2]
It was the Earl of Bute. He decided to station 10,000 men in the colonies.
What happened in Pontiac’s Rebellion? What was this an example of? [4]
- Natives in the Ohio Valley feared that, post-war, the colonists would expand westward and take their land.
- As a result they, in a series of attacks killed or captured around 2,000 colonists.
- They besieged Detroit until the British recaptured it in August.
- This was an example of the British helping the colonists at their own expense,which they became tired of.
When was the Proclamation Act brought in and what did it do? [2]
Proclamation Act brought in October 1763. It made crossing the line drawn along the Appalachians illegal, and any property beyond it null and void.
From a colonist point of view, why were they angry at the Proclamation Act? [3]
- They had a rapid growing population and thus felt like the westward land was necessary to facilitate this.
- They saw the act, enforced by a standing army, as military despotism which prevented their self-determination.
- They saw this Act as a flagrant violation of their policy of salutary neglect.
By the time the Proclamation Act had emerged(inclusive), what complaints did colonists have?[2]
- The inability to move westward due to the British Army and the Proclamation Act.
- The fact that they were now being taxed to fund this British Army in America
- The further fact that they had no representation in the Commonsto protest this tax.
What was the anti-smuggling legislation passed? [3]
- Colonial customs officials had to live in the colonies and were not allowed to just delegate work; they had to do themselves.
- Colonial courts had rights to handle smuggling cases removed as they were often very lenient with their fellow colonists.
- These cases were passed onto a Vice-Admiralty Court, which had no jury and a British, Crown-appointed judge who was much harsher on the colonists. The colonists under trial had to make their own way in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and had to pay for the proceedings regardless of the outcome.
What was the outcome and significance of the anti-smuggling legislation? [2]
- They felt very disrespected by the fact that their rights to jury duty had been removed.
- It implied that they were being treated as second-class citizens; marked slight shift from salutary neglect to more active approach. It did, however, slightly discourage smuggling.
Talk to me about the Sugar Act 1764. [4]
- 5th April 1764
- Tried to amend the issue of smuggling by halving the tax to 3d/gallon to funding the British Army in America
- Rigorously enforced.
- Any official caught accepting a bribe was fined £500 and barred from serving in any govt. post again.
- Supposed to allegedly raise £78,000/year if done right.
Talk to me about the Currency Act. [2]
- It was passed on the 1st September 1764.
- The Currency Act made only British currency legally usable in the colonies, which directly attacked money printing in colonies like Virginia.
- Led to a severe economic depressionwhich threatened many colonists with financial ruin.
- By this point colonists began to look towards John Wilkes, who attacked the king, calling his ministers “tools of despot and corruption”.
Talk to me about the Stamp Act. [8]
It was announced on the 22nd March 1765
* Internal tax
* The British saw this as reasonable, as they believed making the colonists pay for their own land was completely fair.
* The Stamp Act taxed any formally written piece of paper (some 50 items), such as a legal document, that circulated in the colonies
* Marked the end of salutary neglect and was the first direct tax levied on all colonists.
* Attacked in the Virginia House of Burgesses (Assembly); Virginia Resolves brought in by Patrick Henry asserting rights by Royal Charter
* Would have raised £60,000 a year
* October 1765 27 delegates from 9 colonies met at the Stamp Tax Congress to condemn it.
* Boycott of British goods arranged there
* Andrew Oliver’s effigy hung and house attacked
Talk to me about the Townshend Duties. [5]
- The Townshend Duties were passed 1767-68.
- Pitt needed to recover from the Depression, the War, and the 1765 boycotts.
- He also needed British soldiers in America.
- External taxation, not internal so technically acceptable by colonial parameters
- Townshend then created the American Board of Customs Commissioners in Boston, which enforced the duties by paying the officials with the money collected. Weakened assembly power. NY resisted, so 1767 New York Restraining Act suspended assembly until they complied 1767 [+Quartering Act (NO IT WAS 1765) mandated people to provide food and accomodation for soldiers if they entered their house]
- John Dickinson, 1768 wrote Letters of a Pennsylvania Farmer
- Boston organised a boycott of British goods; all but New Hampshire involved by 1769
- It would only have raised £40,000 anyway had the colonists paid in full
Who were the Sons of Liberty? What was their involvement in opposition to the 1760s Acts passed? [4]
- They were a semi-secret society run by Samuel Adams.
- Mainly in the Northern colonies; little Southern control.
- Disunited and not widespread; only 5% of the population were townspeople.
- Thus their role in this action can often be overstated.
- They also ensured that political consciousness was kept high.
Talk to me about the Declaratory Act. [2]
- In March 1766, Rockingham repealed the Stamp Act
- Passed the Declaratory Act, which stated that Parliament had not abandoned its rights to tax or legislate the colonies+reasserted parliamentary sovereignty
What ideological issues did the Stamp Act raise? [2]
- People were also calling back to Lockean ideas from the Enlightenment, that property was a natural right; used to show that the government could govern as long as they didn’t abuse their power.
- If they accepted this, it would pave the way for an unbearable long trail of further taxation.
Why and when were British troops deployed in Boston? How did their presence affect the city? [3]
- Colonial Secretary ordered the Massachusetts Assembly to rescind the Circular Letter (which criticised the Townshend Acts), but this didn’t happen and the governor shut down the Massachusetts Assembly.
- They refused to submit to British authority and he ordered 4000 British troops to reassert order in Boston in October 1768.
- Newspapers spread fake news about the soldiers being brutal and violent and this built up into tension that culminated in the next few weeks.
What were the actual events of (and just before) the Boston Massacre? [2]
- The Sons of Liberty were informed that an 11 year old boy was killed during a riot; 5,000 people attended his funeral.
- On the 2nd March 1770,rope factory workers attacked some soldiers seeking jobs
- On the 5th March 1770 British troops under extreme pressure opened fire, killing 5 Bostonians and creating the impression that it was a deliberate massacre.
What was the Committee of Correspondence? When was it created? [3]
- First created in 1764 in opposition to the Currency Act, and invigorated with the 1765 Stamp Act
- Following the Boston Massacre, Samuel Adams reestablished the Committee of Correspondence in the 1772 Boston Town Meeting:
- This was so networked that by mid-1773, 50 Massachusetts towns had their own committees
- While they didn’t take action, it was useful in spreading correspondence between colonies
What did Lord North(elected 1770) do to try and improve colonial relations? [2]
- He did this by removing Hillsborough and replacing him with a more moderate man, the Earl of Dartmouth in 1772.
- He believed in accommodation as opposed to confrontation.
- He also repealed all of the Townshend Duties in March 1770 except the duty on tea.
What did Lord North pass that further frustrated colonists? [3]
- In 1773, North passed the Tea Act in order to keep colonial trading company The East India Company from bankruptcy by allowing it to export cheap tea directly to the colonies.
- This gave the EIC a monopoly on the tea trade
- It also threatened colonist smugglers from the Dutch West Indies who were importing tea.
- Attack on liberty
What happened at the Boston Tea Party? [2]
In Boston, November 1773 Samuel Adams organised the Sons of Liberty to throw 342 chests of tea, worth about £10,000, into the harbour.
What was the British response to the Boston Tea Party?
They saw the Boston Tea Party as a flagrant act of disrespect. North, thinking they were challenging British security and prosperity, saw Boston as the centre of the chaos, so he introduced the Coercive Acts between 1774 and 1775
What 5 acts formed the Coercive Acts?
- The Boston Port Act (closed until £10,000 repaid)
- The Massachusetts Government Act (North replaced the Governor of Massachusetts, Hutchinson, General Gage - much harsher + banned town meetings)
- The Imperial Administation of Justice Act (allowed British officials to be tried in Britain not the colonies)
- The New Quartering Act (now extended to private property)
- The Quebec Act (angered colonists at Canadian Catholic treatment – double standards)