Trials, Hemodynamics, CP Flashcards
(40 cards)
PARADIGM-HF Trial:
- Clinical Question
- Bottom Line
- CQ –>
- Among patients with HFrEF, does treatment with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduce CV mortality or HF hospitalizations when compared to ACE inhibitor therapy?
- BL –>
- Among patients with HFrEF, treatment with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduces CV mortality or HF hospitalization when compared to enalapril.
- It is also associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality
PARADIGM-HF TRIAL:
What is neprilysin?
- endopeptidase that breaks down vasoactive peptides (BNP, bradykinin, and adrenomedullin)
- its inhibition may lead to:
- reduced remodeling
- vasoconstriction
- renal sodium retention
- –> improved outcomes in HFrEF
Paradigm-HF TRIAL:
- What was the trial preceding the Paradigm-HF trial?
- What was the major limitation of this trial and the target of the Paradigm-HF trial?
- OVERTURE TRIAL (2002)
- Increased rates of angioedema with omapatrilat (aminopeptidase P + ACE + neprilisyn) –> ARB + NI –> targeting multiple points in the pathophysiologic pathway and reducing angioedema
PARADIGM-HF TRIAL (2014):
- Study design
- Major inclusion criteria
- Major outcome
- Guideline generated from study
- Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF)
- Design:
- Multicenter, prospective, randomized, comparative trial - N = 8,399 with median follow up of 27 months
- Inclusion:
- HFrEF (LVEF <40% and <35% were used at different points in the trial) + NYHA class II-IV symptoms randomized to ARNI vs. ACE.
- Major outcome:
- ARNI had a significant reduction in CV mortality (21.8% vs. 26.5%), all-cause mortality (17% vs. 19.8%), as well as each individual component –> trial stopped early.
- Guideline:
- In patients with NYHA Stage II-III HFrEF tolerating ACE inhibitor or ARB, replacement with ARNI is recommended to improve morbidity and mortality.
What are the aldosterone antagonist trials for HFrEF demonstrate mortality benefit and dictate the guidelines?
- RALES (1999) - spironolactone
- EPHESUS (2003) - eplerenone
**TOPCAT (2014) - spironolactone in HFpEF
What are the BB trials for HFrEF demonstrate mortality benefit and dictate the guidelines?
- MERIT-HF (1999) - metoprolol succinate
- CIBIS-II (1999) - bisoprolol
- COPERNICUS (2002) - carvedilol
- COMET (2003) - carvedilol > metoprolol tartrate
RE-LY Trial:
- Clinical Question
- Bottom Line
CQ –>
- Among individuals with chronic atrial fibrillation, how does dabigatran compare to warfarin in terms of stroke risk and the risk of major bleeding?
BL –>
- Compared to warfarin, high-dose dabigatran (20mg) reduces stroke risk without increasing the risk of major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation
RE-LY TRIAL:
What is dabigatran?
- Pradaxa
- Direct Thrombin inhibitor
RE-LY TRIAL:
- Study design
- Major inclusion criteria
- Major outcome
- Guideline generated from study
- Dabigatran vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation - NEJM (2009)
- Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation (RE-LY)
- Design:
- Multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, N=18,113, median follow up ~ 2 years
- low-dose dabigatran
- high-dose dabigatran
- Warfarin
- Multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, N=18,113, median follow up ~ 2 years
- Inclusion:
- Nonvalvular A-fib + moderate-high risk of thromboembolic stroke
- Major outcome:
- Reduced incidence of stroke compared with warfarin
- Guideline:
- Approved for storke prevention in A-fib (2014)
What are the two major axes of cardiac hemodynamic assessment?
- Volume status
- “congestion” characterized as elevated LV filling pressure, often measured as elevated PCWP
- Adequacy of perfusion
- characterized by cardiac index
What does assessment of each axes guide in decision making:
- volume status
- adequacy of perfusion
- Volume status
- titration of diuretics
- suitability for, and/or tolerability of BB’s
- Adequacy of perfusion
- need for inotropic agents and advanced therapies (LVAD, transplant)
What are the noninvasive modalities for assessing cardiac hemodynamics?
- H&P
- Biomarkers (BNP)
- CXR
- Impedance cardiography
- Echo
What are the invasive modalities for assessing cardiac hemodynamics?
- RHC
- Implantable monitors
What are the invasive hemodynamic measurements obtained from RHC?
- RA
- RV
- PA
- PCWP (used as index of LV filling pressure and CO)
- CO (via Fick or TD method)
What is the key parameter/measurement obtained in RHC?
PCWP
- correlates well with left atrial pressure –> usually (in the absence of mitral stenosis) is equivalent to LVEDP
When is PCWP obtained during RHC?
after balloon inflation while balloon wedged in PA
What are the two waves forms that should be identified on PCWP pressure tracing?
What should be obtained simultaneously with these tracings?
PCWP pressure tracings:
- A wave
- V wave
EKG tracing to compare timing and recogniation of wave forms
CVP waveform: -a wave
-atrial contraction -precedes S1 -EKG: correlates with the P wave -disappears with atrial fibrillation -prominent in patients with reduced RV compliance
Where are Canon “a” waves seen
- AV dissociation
- RA contracts against a closed TV
CVP waveform: -c wave
-Cusp of the TV, protruding backwards through the atrium as the RV contracts -EKG: Correlates with QRS
CVP waveform: -x descent
-movement of the RV, descends as it contracts -downward movement –> decreases pressure in the RA -concurrent atrial diastolic relaxation, which further decreases the RA pressure -EKG: occurs before the T-wave
CVP waveform: -v wave
-back pressure generated from blood filling the RA -EKG: occurs after the T-wave -Occurs just after S2 -Huge v-wave = TR *represents blood flowing back ouf of the contracting RV –> V wave would be most prominent wave, and RVSP (30 mmhg)
CVP waveform: -y descent
-pressure decrease caused by the TV opening in early ventricular diastole -EKG: occurs just before the P wave -Loss of y descent = tamponade (restricted RV filling) or TS -Rapid y descent = pericardial constriction
What are the five primary risk factors for increased risk of SCD/candidate for ICD therapy (primary prevention) in HCM?
- FH of premature HCM-related death, particularly sudden death, in close or multiple relatives
- Unexplained syncope, judged non-neurocardiogenic, particularly if recent, in young patients
- NSVT on serial ambulatory EKGs, particularly when bursts are multiple, repettitive, or prolonged
- Hypotensive or attenuated BP response to exercise
- Extreme LV hypertrophy (LV wall thickness > 30mm)


