Types of Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

Schaffer and Emerson’s theory about the stages of attachment, although generally correct, doesn’t take into account many factors. State 3.

A

Individual differences.

Family size.

Family placement.

Disabilities.

Personality.

Environment you are born in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a secure attachment?

A

The result of a strong positive relationship between infant and caregiver, so that although the child shows separation, he or she is easily comforted by the caregivers return.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an insecure attachment?

A

Weak emotional relationship between child and caregiver, leading to an anxious and insecure relationship which can have a negative effect on development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State 3 factors that create insecure attachments.

A

Health of PCG.

Lack of attention from parents (same-sex).

PCG’s job.

Abuse.

Differences in maternal sensitivity in infants whose mothers lacks sensitivity.

Temperament, with which a child is born may be a biologically determined factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Baer and Martinez state in 2006?

A

Children who are maltreated are more likely to be insecurely attached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The nature of attachment is of great importance to what?

A

Development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What percentage of young children in most countries are securely attached? What about insecure?

A

70%.

30% are insecurely attached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Teens/adults with secure attachments are likely to be what 3 things?

A

Better development.

More socially-able.

More confident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Teens/adults with insecure attachments are likely to be what 3 things?

A

Untrusting.

Search/ run from affection. (Humanism links: conditional and unconditional positive regard).

Have a lower self-esteem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline Wartner et al’s study from 1994.

(Supports the idea that secure attachments increase an infant’s confidence and social strength)
(The value of secure attachments)

A

Supports the idea that secure attachments increase an infant’s confidence and social strength.

This is because they observed that securely attached children showed more competence in their play.

Children are able to confidently explore their environment, whilst using their PCG as a base.

This suggests that secure attachments are more beneficial for infant development than insecure attachments.

They also found that 82% of children at the age of 18 months and 6 years remained in the same category of attachment.

This reinforces the significance of early attachments, and how important it is for an infant to develop a secure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Belsky and Fearon state in 2002?

A

Securely attached children had a greater social confidence, school readiness, expressive language and receptive language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When did Harlow conduct his Baby Monkey study?

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

1959.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the aim of Harlow’s research?

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

Test learning theory by comparing attachment behaviour in baby monkeys given a wire surrogate mother producing milk with those given a soft towelling mother with no milk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the procedure of Harlow’s research?

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

Two surrogate mothers were constructed, one a ‘harsh wire’ and the other a ‘soft towelling’.

16 baby monkeys were used, four in each four conditions:

- Towelling mother (no milk) with wire mother (milk).
- Towelling mother (milk) with wire mother (no milk).
- Wire mother (milk).
- Towelling mother (milk).

The amount of time spent with each mother, as well as feeding time, was recorded.

The monkeys were frightened with a loud noise to test for mother preference during stress.

A larger cage was also used to test the monkeys degree of exploration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State 3 findings from Harlow’s study.

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

Monkeys preferred contact with the towelling mother when given a choice between both, regardless of whether milk was produced. They even stretched between the mothers in order to gather food and stay in proximity.

Monkeys with only a wire surrogate mother had diarrhoea, a sign of stress.

When frightened the monkeys clung to the the towelling mother when she was available.

In the larger cage conditions, monkeys with towelling mothers explored more and visited their surrogate mother more often.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was concluded from Harlow’s study?

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

Rhesus monkeys have an innate, unlearned need for contact comfort, suggesting that attachment concerns emotional security more than food.

Contact comfort is associated with lower levels of stress and a willingness to explore, indicating emotional security.

17
Q

State two evaluative points from Harlow’s study.

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

Study involved animals and therefore we cannot extrapolate the results to humans.

There are ethical issues involving the separation of baby monkeys and the stress caused to them.

18
Q

Overtime, Harlow publicly distanced himself from the work of who? What did Harlow think of Bowlby?

(Harry Harlow’s Baby Monkeys, 1959)

A

Bowlby and Ainsworth, as well as Lorenz’s views on imprinting.

He especially did not believe that his work supported Bowlby’s belief of a child’s innate need for mother love.

19
Q

What was the aim of Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

Investigate individual variation in infant attachments; in particular differences between secure and insecure attachments.

20
Q

When did Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation occur?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

1970.

21
Q

What was the procedure of Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

The strange situation test lasts for just over 20 minutes and was used on American infants ages between 12 and 18 months.

It takes place in the laboratory and the method used is controlled observation.

22
Q

What happens in the first stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

30 seconds.

Mother/ caregiver, infant and researcher in the room.

Researcher brings the other into the room and rapidly leaves.

23
Q

What happens in the second stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Mother/ caregiver and infant in the room. Mother/ caregiver sits; infant is free to explore.

24
Q

What happens in the third stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Stranger, mother/ caregiver and infant in the room.

Stranger comes in and after a while talks to mother/ caregiver and then to the infant.

Mother/ caregiver leaves the room.

25
Q

What happens in the fourth stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Stranger and infant in the room.

Stranger keeps trying to talk and play with the infant.

26
Q

What happens in the fifth stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Mother/ caregiver and infant in the room.

Stranger leaves as mother/ caregiver returns to the infant; at the end of this stage the mother/ caregiver leaves the room - infant is alone.

27
Q

What happens in the sixth stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Infant in the room.

Infant is alone in the room.

28
Q

What happens in the seventh stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Stranger and infant in the room.

Stranger returns and tries to interact with the infant.

29
Q

What happens in the eighth stage of the Strange Situation?

(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

3 minutes.

Mother/ caregiver and infant in the room.

Mother/ caregiver returns and interacts with the infant, the stranger leaves.

30
Q

What categorises a secure attachment?

(Findings)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

Infant is distressed by the caregiver’s absence.

Quickly content after his/her return.

Clear difference in the infant’s reaction to a stranger.

Infant will explore environment using PCG as a secure base.

31
Q

What percentage of American infants showed secure attachments?

(Findings)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

70%

32
Q

What categorises an insecure resistant attachment?

(Findings)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

Insecure in presence of caregiver and becomes severely distressed when her/she leaves.

Infant resists contact with the caregiver upon return.

Wary of the stranger.

33
Q

What percentage of American infants showed insecure resistant attachments?

(Findings)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

10%.

34
Q

What categorises an insecure avoidant attachment?

(Findings)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

Infant doesn’t seek contact with caregiver and shows little distress when separated.

Avoids contact with caregiver upon return.

Treats stranger in a similar way to their caregiver.

35
Q

What percentage of American infants showed insecure avoidant attachments?

(Findings)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

20%.

36
Q

Outline Main and Solomon’s study from 1986.

(Challenges the validity of the Strange Situation, as well as the presence of a fourth attachment type)
(Evaluation)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

Challenges the validity of the Strange Situation, as well as the presence of a fourth attachment type.

This is because they found that a small number of infants displayed disorganised attachment, in which the infants showed no consistent pattern of behaviour, and fitted none of the 3 main attachment types.

Although they accepted Ainsworth’s 3 attachment types, they highlight how reductionist it is to limit the number of available attachment types, not acknowledging individual differences that may not be universal.

37
Q

The Strange Situation was created and tested in the USA. Evaluate.

(Evaluation)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

As a result, it is subject to an ethnocentric culture bias, only reflecting the norms and values of American culture.

This is then incorrectly applied as a universal standard for all attachment behaviour.

38
Q

The Strange Situation is artificial in ways that may well distort behaviour. Evaluate.

(Evaluation)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

This may be due to either social desirability bias or demand characteristics.

For example, some mothers or other caregivers are likely to behave differently towards their child’s when they know they are being observed than they would do at home when they are alone with their child.

39
Q

Ainsworth and Bell put infants into 3 categories, this is deterministic. Why?

(Evaluation)
(Ainsworth and Bell’s Strange Situation, 1970)

A

It oversimplifies the attachment process, as infants within any given category differ from each other in their attachment behaviour.

To presume that all individuals will fit one of three categories is also highly reductionist - not considering the role of individual differences (Main and Solomon, 1986).