UAM Flashcards

(15 cards)

1
Q

define UAM

A

D must have done a dangerous criminal act which causes death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

elements of UAM

A

1- D must have committed an unlawful act
2- which is dangerous
3- which causes V to die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what’s the MR for UAM

A
  • same MR of the unlawful act (crime)
  • MR does not need to be proven for death only intent/ SR for unlawful act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what’s element 1
what does this mean
what can it not be

A

D must have committed an unlawful act
-act must be a crime
-D must have the AR and MR for the crime
-cannot be an ommission
-doesnt have to be targeted at a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

good fellow

A

D had been harassed by 2 men so wanted to move from his council house, to get rehoused he set his house on fire, his wife and son died in fire
WAS UAM
POL- no requirement for the act to be targeted at a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Larkin

A

D waved a razor around intending to scare his friends , claimed his wife fell at the razor due to drunk state
WAS UAM
POL- was a dangerous act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

lamb

A

2 boys playing with a gun, believed it was unloaded and D shot at V, V died
NOT UAM
POL-not unlawful, D didn’t have MR or AR as V thought not loaded so didn’t apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is element 2
what is it measured against
what’s the case

A

-which is dangerous
-is measured against an ordinary person- would they realise the risk of some harm and not just fear it
-church 1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what’s the church 1966 rule

A

would a RM recognise the unlawful act would subject another person the risk of some harm, albeit not serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Newbury and jones

A

2 boys threw a paving slab off a railway bridge as a train approached, the slab went through a glass window killing a guard
GUILTY UAM
POL-D act was unlawful and caused death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what’s element 3
what’s an intervening act

A
  • Ds act must cause death
    -causation applies
    -self injecting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what points are considered in element 3

A
  • did D do the unlawful act
    -did D cause Vs death/ was self injecting an intervening act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

dalby

A

D supplied a drug, V self injected
NOT UAM
POL- self injecting is an intervening act breaking the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kennedy

A

D prepared injection of heroin and water for V to inject himself
WAS UAM
POL- D had assisted self injection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rodgers

A

D participated in self-injection of heroin by holding belt around Vs arm making it easier for V to find the vein
WAS UAM
POL- D helped self inject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly