Unit 3 - Social Challenges Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Three Methods of Social Change

A
  1. Behaviour Modification
  2. Social Cognitive Theory
  3. Social Persuasion Theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Part One: Behaviour Modification

A

Process where behaviour is changed due to experiences and environmental changes
* Classical - learning by association
* Operant - learning by reward/punishment system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who discovered Classical Conditioning?

A

Ivan Pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Classical Conditioning Function

A

Process of repeatedly pairing a neutral stimulus with a natural response - eventually elicit the desired response from the neutral stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Classical Conditioning Equation

A

Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) - Uncondidtioned Response (UCR) - Neutral Stimulus (NS) - Conditioned Stimulus (CS) - Conditoned Response (CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Classical Conditioning Equation (Extra)

A
  • UCS causes UCR
  • automatically, naturally, untrained, untaught, universally
  • NC becomes CS
  • starts neutral, than changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who discovered Operant Conditioning?

A

B.F Skinner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Operant Conditioning Function

A
  • operates on a reward - punishment basis
  • systems of rewards and punishments can change behaviour
  • uses positive and negative reinforcement
    “rewarding behaviour is likely to occur” - Edward Thorndike’s “Law of Effect”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Operant Conditioning Equation

A

Spontaneous Behaviour (SB) - Consequence (C) - Stimulus (S) - Response (R)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Operant Conditioning with Children

A
  • parents shape children’s action using operant conditioning: didnt finish dinner = no dessert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Learning by Observation

A
  • conditioning minimizes how much is learned through observation and modeling
    ex. Albert Bandura’s “Bobo Doll Study”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Part Three: Social Persuation Theory

A

all types of behaviour modification shape our behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Robert Cialdini

A
  • outlines the 6 levels of influence used by marketers to elicit automatic responses
  • argues humans rely on mental shortcuts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Level 1: Reciprocation

A

rooted in the social belief that we should repay in kind what others do for us
ex. free samples of products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Level 2: Commitment and Consistency

A

created by two general characteristics:
1. inner desire to meet out commitments
2. dislike appearing inconsistent
both drive people to become attached to something once they’ve committed to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Level 3: Liking

A
  • more likely to buy from those we like - like those who are similar to us
17
Q

Level 4: Social Proof

A

human behaviour

18
Q

Liking vs Social Proof

A

Liking: small scale, direct connection, persuaded by someone (similar) that we know
Social Proof: large scale; broad social observations; general influence

19
Q

Level 5: Authority

A
  • most people obey those in authority - more likely to ober those we trust
20
Q

Level 6: Scarcity

A

Human thought:
- opportunities seem more valuable when their availability is limited”

21
Q

Define Stereotype

A

a belief about the personal attributes of a group of people

22
Q

Define Prejudice

A

an attitude towards a person because of their group membership

23
Q

Define Discrimination

A

behaviour or action towards a group or its members

24
Q

Overt vs Subtle

A

Overt: out in the open
Subtle: less obvious

25
1970s Experiment With Whites
- group of white people watch a black man being pushed around by white men - seen as "playing aroud"; "horsing aroud" - group of white people watch a white man being pushed around by black men - seen as "violent"; "aggression"
26
The 2 Social Discrimination Theories
1. Socialization 2.
27
Socialization
stereotypes are taught at impressionable age especially by parents
28
Jane Elliott
American diversity educator and school teacher in Iowa
29
Blue eyes/Brown eyes Experiment
- the kids are told that Blue eyed kids are better (they get more recess, extra serving of lunch etc) - Blue eyes kids begin to other the Brown eyed kids - Next day the role is switched.
30
Impact on those facing discrimination
1. lack of control; helplessness; increased anxiety 2. self-esteem; not affected 3. mental health; higher chance of depression 4. stereotype threat: fear one will conform to negative stereotypes
31
Social Impacts
long-term social advantages: income, opportunities, choices
32
Muzafer Sherif Study
Name: Robber's Cave Experiment - experimented on 22 boys (11-12 years old), separate them in two groups (Eagles vs Rattlers)
33
Phase One of Robber's Cave Experiment
In-group formation - creates group identity, team-building
34
Phase Two Robber's Cave Experiment
Friction - create conflict between the two groups - competitions added: one group wins at the expense of others - name-calling, cabin raids, food fights
35
Phase Three of Robber's Cave Experiment
Integration - remixing the groups (doesnt work) - mutual cooperation approach (works) - creates crisis to promote team work
36
Aislinn Bohren Experiment
Defines discrimination as "differences in observable outcomes (wages, hiring, evaluation) that cannot be attributed directly to underlying differences in performance."
37
Possibility #1: Taste-Based Discrimination
- rooted in dislike for the group
38
Possibility #2: Belief-Based Discrimination
- expect different performance outcomes between groups - no preference or dislike for the group - action: judge an individual's likely outcome based on the belief about group membership
39