unit 4 barron's Flashcards

1
Q

social influence theory

A

the idea that how people feel and act is affected by others around them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

attribution theory
+ what are the two components?
+examples?

A

the theory that explains someone’s behavior using either situational factors or personal dispositions.
dispositional attribution: a person behaves a certain way because of their traits.
situational attribution: a person might behave a certain way because of situational factors, ex: when you act angry because your car broke down.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

self-fulfilling prophecy
+which experiment?

A

the expectations/predictions we have of others can influence those others’ behavior or “become true”.
+pygmalion in the classroom experiment where random students were treated like intelligent people and they actually increased their IQ scores.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

fundamental attribution error
+example?
+ what aspect about collectivist vs individualistic cultures?

A

when you underestimate the impact of the situational factors and overestimate the impact of personal dispositions:
ex: Claire gets tackled by accident by another runner at a marathon which leaves her unable to complete the marathon. she believes that the other runner did that on purpose.
- psychologists now argue that collectivist cultures show less fund. attributional error than individualistic cultures because they understand the situational factors better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

actor observer bias
+example?

A

people are more likely to make situational attributions about themselves than about others.
ex: if you are quiet in a class you might attribute it to the fact that it is a boring class, but your classmate might think that you are shy in general.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

false consensus effect

A

the tendency for people to overestimate the amount of people who agree with them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

self serving bias

A

when people overestimate their impact on good outcomes and underestimate their impact on bad outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

just world phenomenon
+example

A

believing that good things happen to only good people and bad things to only bad people.
- ex: if somebody thinks unemployed people are just lazy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mere exposure effect
+example

A

the more you are exposed to sth the more you will come to like it.
+ ex: when you go to the store and see a huge ad sign about Ruffles chips, and you see it several times so you decide to buy it and like it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

elaboration likelihood model
+what are the two types associated with it?

A

suggests that persuasion takes two forms:
central route to persuasion: deeper processing as to what a product contains, benefits, etc. “LOGIC”
peripheral route to persuasion: when people are persuaded more by incidental cues, ex: who the advertiser is.
If it is a celebrity that advertises the product people are more likely to buy it.
“EMOTIONS, ETHOS”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

cognitive dissonance theory

+example
+conscious/unconscious?

A

when a person’s attitudes(beliefs) and behaviors contradict, causing discomfort. either the attitudes or the behaviors have to change.
ex: if somebody believes alcohol is bad then starts drinking beer, they might change their attitude about alcohol.

+ this change happens without conscious awareness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

foot in the door technique
+example

A

suggests that when you ask for a small request and then follow up with a larger request, the second request is more likely to be accepted.

ex: when you ask your friend for $5 and then $15.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

door-in-the-face technique

A

when people refuse a large, unreasonable request, a second, smaller and much more reasonable request is more likely to be accepted.

ex: if you ask your friend for $100 and they refuse, so you ask for $ 15 instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

social reciprocity norm/ norms of reciprocity

A

when people do something nice to you you feel like you have to return that favor.
ex: when you cast your vote on that one SGA president candidate that provided food for the entire school.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social responsibility norm

A

the belief that we should all try to make the world a better place by doing what we can do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

social traps

A

a situation in which we all have to contribute to solve a problem but our personal influence is so small that we act upon our immediate personal interests rather than trying to solve that problem.
ex: climate change, environmental problems.

17
Q

stereotypes
+example?

A

typical representation of a social group: race, ethnicity, geography

ex: New Yorkers are rude.

18
Q

prejudice vs discrmination

A

prejudice is looking negative on a group. discrimination is acting with your prejudice.

19
Q

explicit attitude vs implicit attitude in prejudice

A

explicit: conscious prejudice
implicit: unconscious prejudice

20
Q

out-group homogeneity bias

A

when you view your own group as more diverse and other “out-groups” as more similar, homogenous.
ex: a new yorker knows that not all new yorkers are rude, some are really nice. but they may view a californian as fake.

21
Q

in-group bias

A

people tend to view their own group more favorably than other groups.

22
Q

superordinate goal and contact theory

A

the contact theory suggests that by putting a diverse group of people together that have prejudices toward one another and making them all work towards one goal that benefits all (superordinate goal), their prejudice will decrease.

23
Q

instrumental vs hostile aggression
+examples for both

A

instrumental aggression has a clear purpose, the individual wants to achieve sth by showing aggression.
ex: bank robbery

hostile aggression has no clear purpose.
ex: somebody yelling

24
Q

frustration aggression hypothesis

A

the more someone is frustrated the more likely they will be aggressive.

25
bystander effect
the larger a group of people to witness an emergency the less likely each person is going to intervene, because everyone will think that another person is going to step up.
26
social facilitation
suggests that the presence of others improve task performance
27
upward social comparison
when you compare yourself with people that do better than you
28
downward social comparison
when you compare yourself with people that do worse than you
29
relative deprivation theory
suggests that people who practice lots of upward social comparison feel less satisfied with their lives.
30
conformity
going along with a group's behavior to fit in
31
normative social influence +example
when you conform to fit in within a group and not stand out ex: wearing a hoodie and pants like everyone else at school instead of a pink dress
32
informative social influence +example
when you conform because you think the group is doing something for the best reason ex: wearing bright sportswear to a night run club bc the others are also wearing bright clothing to avoid accidents.
33
social loafing +example
when individuals do not put in as much effort in a group as when they are alone. ex: a group project
34
group polarization
when a group itself is more likely to make more extreme decisions than the individuals of the group alone.
35
groupthink -by whom? -example? -reasoning?
the tendency of a group to make bad decisions, proposed by Irving Janis. example: when a group engages in rioting when the individuals themselves would not do that on their own. - reasoning: it is usually because the individuals feel more protected and anonymous, also might try to "fit in". (deindividuation)