Voting In Practise Flashcards
(31 cards)
What is the difference between voting as a right or a duty
In some countries is a civic duty and citizens are punished if they do not vote
In many countries it is a civic right and the voting is voluntary in this case the turnout to elections varies depends on different factors ( across countries, type of elections, demographic and socioeconomic groups)
How many countries have compulsory voting
27 countries and 10 of them enforce it
When is voter turn out higher
Voter turnout is higher in general elections compared to local ones and it is higher when more senstive issues are a t stake e.g. refrudem, leaving the EU 2016
Why do voters vote
The rational voter will vote if the benefits of voting are greater than the cost of voting - this concerns the outcomee which would benfit the voter but only if they can affect the outcome
- this will depend on the probability of voter i being pivotal pi
- and the benefit from the outcome Bi
- the costs will include the informational ( processing and stressing and not living their life ) transportation opportunity costs Ci (aggregate cost)
What does PiBi> Ci mena
The probability of affecting the outcome pi is very small the voter is more likely to abstain
This proximity will affect the number of voters Therfore the larger the election the more likely agents are to vote
Leading to paradox of voting
What is the paradox of voting
Downs (1957) the probability of affecting thr outcome by one single vote is very small and the rational voter is likely to abstain
However historically we observe a much higher turnout - relevant is larger elections
Pi is a function of how many votes
If there are two options and 1,000,000 voters and it is 50/50 split whe will the vote mater
Your vote will only matter if you are the pivotal vote
Making the probability of being the pivotal voter
When is it rational or irrational for voters to vote
Voters should vote when the probability of there outcome happening is higher than the cost of
They should abstain from voting when the cost of voting is higher than the probability of there outcome is lower than the cost of
What does Aldrich 1997 say about voting
The rationality of voting is the Achilles heel of rational choice theory in political science
Explain voter turnout makes us challenge the economic assumption of rational agents
Alledgadly everyone that turns out to vote who is not the pivotal voter is irrrational
Rational voter is ignorant as info is costly
What does downs 1957 say about voters
Based on the fact that information is costly the rational voter must be ignorant about the relevant relevant aspects of his desicion marking
What is Dhillon and Peralta (2002) typology
- objective function theory
- voter rationality theory
- Benevolent or altruistic theory
- information based theories (are there informational problems that are crucial for turnout decision)
What is objectivite function explanation
- instrumental motivations
Voters only care about the outcome of their vote - vote value decreases as the number of voter increase ( and this is the discounted utility by the probability that her vote will count )
Given that the vote value per vote is small in large elections even a very small cost should encourage rational voter to abstain
Therfore these models cannot explain the voter turnout
What is the second explanation for the objective function based
Expressive motivations
- people care about the expressive value of voting ( avoiding ones self worth and illustrating you care and make you looks better - how you are perceived)
They vote as it attaches them to the outcome and not so much because of theor influence on the utcome
This however doesn’t rule out the instrumental motivations Voters only- and more so ads to the expressive benefits Di
What is expressive motivations
If the expressive outcome (Di) is greater than the cost then a rational voter will vote
Voting gives the voter utility
This will create a bandwagon effect - the more that vote the more those hesitating will regardless of their values
- however it hard to measure the expressive element
Rationality revision explanation
- this questions the rationality of the voters - voter do not calculate accurately the probability of being pivotal
- they may have regret from previous elections about not voting
- closing the opinion before the vote may make people vote even more and may make people think thy are the pivotal turnout
- this however doesn’t rule not predict why the turnout will be high
Altruism based explanation
- an altruistic voter is an active supporter if theor group and such voyer receives utility not only from voting but Leo from supporting the group
- receiving ethical values from helping other ( different from i hope to effect the outcome) and this maximises the chances of the group wining
Therefore the stronger the group the more likely the group is to support each other ( and more altruistic feeling within the group eg party memebersgip and feelings of belonging ) - this model doesn’t explain freerider behaviour and as an economist isn’t hard o pin everything onto altruism
-
Information based explination feeders en and pesendrfer (1996) swing voters curse
- They show that voters that think of themselves as uninformed will abstain from voting and let informed people vote and make decisions
- abstenation is considered optimal and rational choice when voter are uniformed
What is swing voters curse
Less informed/ indifferent voter prefer to abstain rather than vote
They may be indifferent because the are misinformed but they may be misinformed and Therfore be indifferent
This is rational and holds even if the voting is costless
What is the summary on why people vote ( 4 explanations)
- Objective function - caring about policy ( rational choice / caring about identity ( expressive choice) and people vote because there is value in their utility functions
- Rationality revision - relaxing the assumption on full rationality people cannot fully evaluate the probability of them being pivotal ( may overestimate or underestimate their impact
- Altruism theory - voting introduces social benfit fora group ( they believe its their ethical concern and sense of duty
- Information based theory - people will abstain from voting as they believe they are min formed and they will then deklegate their vote to informed voter ( considered rational)
Voting to tell others - DellaVigna et al 2017
- They propose that social image motivations matter
- model: happy to share if you did vote but feeling of shame or lying to say you didn’t vite
- field experiment: door to door canvassing in Chicago after 2010 elections
- motivation is large as they are paid 5-15 dollars to vote
- flyer
Different group served flyers in different ways and given out by undergrads in Chicago ( prewarned that they were coming) - findings: non voters feelshame but voters do not feel pride ( non voters are 20% more likely to open the door ) and in general non voters were less likely overall to open the door
Mainframn finding: non voters lie and Celiatat they vote half the time while voters tell the truth - evidence that non voters want to be seen as voters
h
Battaglini et al 2010
- This provides the first lab study at Princeton Lab for experimental social science (PLESS) and they find support for the swing voter curse
- main finding: almost all informed voters chose correctly and uninformed voter abstain from voting as they
- strong evidence supporting swing voters curse
- however not all others have the same prefrences ( to get it right and earn more payoffs)