W3 research methods Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

types of research

Qualitative

A
  • non-numerical
  • subjective experience (bottom-up)
  • small sample
  • collected in interview/group/natural
  • flexible

for sociology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

types of research

Quantitative

A
  • numerical
  • test hypotheses (top-down)
  • large sample size
  • collect in survey/experiments
  • inflexible structure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

error bars

A

represent the variability in scores
- standard error of the mean
- confidence interval 95%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

measurement in quantitative research

A

some things easy to measure (height, income)
others are difficult (anxiety, intelligence)
- eg constructs of live not observable but inferred from observable behaviour

psycs methods and instruments to assess constructs indirectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

example - operationalisation of love

A

intensity of feelings - scale no love to overwhelming
satisfaction - eg 1 strongly dislike, 10 strongly love
frequency of expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of variables
Scales of measurement

categorical + continuous

A
  1. nominal
  2. ordinal
  3. interval
  4. ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nominal scale

A

scale categories preferences without order

fav flavours choc vanilla, mint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ordinal scale

A

scale categories preferences with meaningful order

1. choc, 2 mint, 3 vanilla

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interval scale

A

scale has equal intervals
no true zero point

eg. ice cream enjoyment 0 strong dislike, 10 strongly like

0 doesnt mean no enjoyment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ratio scale

A

scale has equal intervals and zero point

eg. # of scoops eaten

0 means 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Measurement error =

2 types

minimise it means…

A

difference between observed and true score of variable being measured

1. random, 2. systematic

more reliability and validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. random error
A

unpredictable factors that vary across measurement

eg. mood/weather means less hand hold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. systematic error
A

consistent biases in measurement

eg. some cultures less public display of love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

assessing quality of a measure

Reliability =

A

consistent results and reproducibility of measurements across different instances
- similar result under similar conditions

not true score eg. im 75kg, it say 88,87,85

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Validity

A

extent to which it accurately measures what is claims to measure

valid, accurate, reliable
eg. 75kg, it says 75,74,75.5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 types of reliability

A

test-retest = consistent measurements over time
- internal = consistency across items in a test
- inter-rater = consistent across different observers

17
Q

Surveys

example

A

public opinion by structured interview/questionnaire
- objective
- widely used
- gain representative sample of popn
- cost effective

eg. measure attitudes likert 1-5

18
Q

Issues of survey research

A
  • corrupted by social desirable responding
  • differences in presentation influence responses
19
Q

Experiments

A

manipulate predictor IV eg water
allow outcome DV to vary naturally eg growth
- but impossible to know everything that affects outcome, thus randomisation

20
Q

True randomised experiments

A

cause and effect between variables
- randomly assign population to groups
- designs treatment (IV)
- requires control + experimental group
- analyse both outcomes

21
Q

Between-subjects design

A

random popn
half to treatment B, and other half to B
- simple
- eliminates carry over
- shorter testing, less fatigue

22
Q

Within-subjects

A

each participant is exposed to each treatment
- more statistical power
- smaller sample
- control of other variables like age
- efficient data collection

23
Q

limitation of true randomised

A

monster study 1939
- non-consensual study on stuttering
- positive - encouraged
- negative - criticised speech
–> negative group developed speech problems

ethical + practical

24
Q

Quasi experiment

A

lack randomisation, sacrifices control
- non-random assignment to groups
- researcher doesnt design the treatment
- pre-existing
- control groups not mandatory

25
Quasi example | foetal alcohol syndrome
compare children whose mothers drink/not during pregnancy - naturally occuring (didnt force change in consumption) - FAS associated with impairments - non-random between groups - other variables not controlled (diet, exercise)
26
4 types of validity | FCIE
1. face validity 2. construct validity 3. internal validity 4. external
27
face validity
extent to which a measure 'looks life' what it will measure - subjective
28
construct validity
extent to which a measure accurately measures the construct its intended to | eg. attitudes predict behaviour? need specific Q and phrasing ## Footnote specific = better prediction
29
Internal validity
extent to which a study establish causal relationship between IV and DV
30
External validity
extent which research findings generalise beyond context of study | real ecological false on twitter spreads faster truth reddit opposite ## Footnote false persuasive statements is ecologically unusual
31
balancing internal and external validity
Euphemism treadmill Pinker 1994 - new terms more respectful, but when gain a negative connotation are replaced Jackson 2023 - lexical evolution - naturalistic - more negative words evolve more quickly - experimental - new dialect created, individual decisions drive popuation outcomes
32
triangulation
using multiplease theories/method to increase validity + reliability | - mitigate biases - increase confidence of findings
33
Research quality is affected by: | 4 things
1. confounds (threat internal) + artefacts (threat external) 2. the scientist -bias, p-hacking, fabrication 3. demand/hawthorne effect - participants modify behaviour when observed 4. placebo - inactive treatment, nocebo