W6 Flashcards
(56 cards)
Moderation Definition
A moderator (V2) changes the strength or direction of the effect of an independent variable (V1) on a dependent variable (Y). The moderator “interferes” with the relationship between IV and DV.
Moderation Examples
Effect of salary (IV) on job intention (DV) depends on age (moderator), - Effect of advertisement (IV) on sales (DV) depends on message clarity, - Effect of discount (IV) on sales (DV) depends on whether it’s in-store or online (moderator) (moderator)
How Moderators Work
Strengthening: A high value of moderator makes the IV effect stronger (more positive or more negative), - Weakening: A high value of moderator makes the IV effect weaker (less positive or less negative)
Graphical Representation of Moderation
Two regression lines are used when a moderator is present (e.g. low vs. high moderator), - The difference in slopes shows how the moderator changes the relationship between IV and DV
Strengthening Effect
Moderator increases slope steepness (absolute value), - Sign of moderation is the same as the sign of the main effect
Buffering Effect
Moderator decreases slope (absolute value), - Sign of moderation is opposite to the sign of the main effect
Antagonistic Effect
Moderator reverses the sign of the relationship (slopes go in opposite directions), - High and low levels of moderator flip the relationship between IV and DV
Summary of Types of Moderation
No moderation = parallel lines, - Strengthening = steeper slope for higher moderator, - Weakening = flatter slope for higher moderator, - Antagonistic = slope changes direction between levels of moderator
Moderation - Foundation
Moderation occurs when the effect of an independent variable (IV) on a dependent variable (DV) depends on a third variable (moderator). It can strengthen or weaken the effect.
Strengthening vs Weakening Effects
Strengthening: Moderator increases the IV → DV effect., - Weakening: Moderator decreases the IV → DV effect.
Buffering and Antagonistic Effects
Buffering: Effect remains in same direction but becomes weaker., - Antagonistic: Effect changes direction (e.g. positive to negative).
Visualising Moderation Effects
Different slopes on regression lines: - Steeper slope with moderator = strengthening, - Flatter = buffering, - Opposite slope = antagonistic
One-Way Interaction Regression
Use formula: Y = b0 + b1IV + b2Mod + b3*(IV×Mod) + error. The b3 term shows how the moderator alters the IV’s effect.
Dummy Variables as Moderators
Dummy variables coded 0 or 1. Interaction terms formed as IV × dummy. R handles this automatically with lm() by including IV*Mod in the formula.
Interpreting R Output
Look for significance (p < 0.05) in the interaction term. Positive value = strengthening, negative = weakening.
Example: Price Discount & Ads
IV = price discount, Mod = feature ad, - Interaction term is +11.675 and significant, - Conclusion: Feature ads strengthen the effect of discounts.
Detecting Moderation Types
Check direction and significance of IV and interaction term: - Both positive = strengthening, - Opposite signs = antagonistic/weakening
Graph Interpretation
Higher moderator = steeper line if strengthening, - Shallower slope = buffering, - Crossed lines = antagonistic
One-way Interaction with Metric Variables
Used when both the independent variable (IV) and moderator are continuous (metric). Example: Advertising spend (IV) and individualism score (moderator).
Regression Formula
Y = b₀ + b₁ × V₁ + b₂ × V₂ + b₃ × (V₁ × V₂) + error, Where V₁ is the IV, V₂ is the moderator, and V₁ × V₂ is the interaction term.
Scenario Overview
The researcher wants to see how advertising affects intention to adopt, and whether this depends on individualism scores.
R Output Interpretation
b₁: Effect of advertising, b₂: Effect of individualism, b₃: Interaction effect (how individualism moderates the impact of advertising)
What the Coefficients Mean
Example output:Advertising = –0.037 (not significant), Individualism = 0.010, Interaction = –0.013 (significant), → This suggests higher individualism weakens the effect of advertising (i.e. antagonistic).
Effect Interpretation
1 pt increase in advertising = –0.038 – 0.013 × individualism, 1 pt increase in individualism = 0.010 – 0.013 × advertising