Week 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What are Qualitative Methods

A
  • Focuses on qualities that are holistic in nature
  • Looks at instances in context
    • Interviewing
    • Observing with note taking
    • Ecinography
    • Auto-Ecinography - Focus on self
    • Analysing documents, text, data or social media or photovoice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why are Qualitative Methods Valueable

A
  1. Focuses on Lived Experience
  2. Honours Local Meaning - Focus on personal viewpoint not externa, imposed researcher viewpoint
  3. Preserves Chronological Flow - Which events occur in order and how they affect each other
  4. Bricolage - Makes sense of disparate data
  5. Rich, Holistic and Accessible\
  6. Explains Quantative Data
  7. Interdisciplinary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Generalise Qualitative Data

A
  • Statistical Generalisation
  • Take random sample in a small group
  • Then apply the result to the larger population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Statistical Resonance

A
  • Aesthetic Merit
  • Naturalistic Generalisations
  • Transferable Findings
  • Critical Incidence Sampling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Aesthetic Merit

A
  • Writing Beautifully
  • Evocative Writing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Naturalistic Generalisations

A
  • Emphasizes practical, functional application of research findings
  • Intuitively falls naturally in line with readers’ ordinary experiences.
  • Individuals learn from the generalizations mad in everyday experiences; Not just the authors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Transferable Findings

A
  • Extent to which writing can be applied in other contexts and studies.
  • Interchangeable for terms generalisability and external validity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Critical Incident Sampling

A
  • Choosing a sample that has the most likely comparison to gen pop
  • If it is true about this group then it can be true of a greater group
    *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bricolage

A
  • Making something from nothing.
  • Creation from a diverse range of things
  • Doesn’t worry about the coherence of the words or ideas it uses
  • Improvise a solution to a problem without proper or obvious tools or materials.
  • Asking a question after the data has been provided
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Research Questions as Maps

A
  • Often research is conducted without a clear direction
  • Having a question can restrain you
  • Maps can be a guide and doesn’t need accuracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Targeting Your Audience

A
  • Ask “which authors do I really want to capture their attention”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Empirical Research Question

A
  • Think about Research Problem not Topic
  • Who is the audience
  • Make question Empirical not Theoretical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why Questions in Interview

A

Adults can get defensive if you ask why

Instead ask . . .

How is it that you came to . . . ? as it can be less invasive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

5 Tasks of Psychology Research

A
  1. Examine - how people think, feel and behave
  2. Discover - what influences feelings, thoughts and behaviours
  3. Determine - consequences of feelings, thoughts and behaviours
  4. Exploring - Perspective and meaning of occurrences
  5. Examine again - how ideas and events are represented in language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nomothetic Research

A
  • Predicts future occurrences
  • Requires large samples
  • More suited to quantitative data
  • Trades depth for generality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Idiographic Research

A
  • Seeks deeper detail understanding
  • Requires more descriptive data
  • Samples can be smaller and more manageable
  • Trade generality for depth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is Qualitative Research

A
  • Primarily focused on making sense of context
  • Specific human experience
  • Not just predicting behaviour
  • Need to understand linguistics, history and social context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Different Approaches

A
  • A blend of approaches is needed
  • e.g. Case studies, feminism, naturalistic enquiry
  • Have Shared Characteristics
    • Description, context, meaning, interpretation, truth, process.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Thick Description

A
  • Thorough concentrated descriptions
  • Contains authors feelings & thoughts
  • Also add objective information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Research Contexts

A
  • Occurs in everyday context
  • Accounts for social, political, cultural and historical events
  • Immersion to deeply understand a perspective
  • Power relations have very real effects
  • Theory development happens within this context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Importance of Context

A

Objects take on meaning based on what we plan to do with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Importance of Meaning

A

Social experiences are concept-dependent

Unavoidably affected by the meanings attached to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Interpretation

A
  • How we see the world
  • Quantative screens out interpretation
  • Qualitative says this is impossible - Interpretation is who we are
  • Bridge between reality and understanding
  • Always a gap when we don’t understand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Surplus of Meaning

A
  • Changes in relation to our understanding
  • Understanding is changeable so continually changing
  • There is always more to add, with new points of view
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Truth
* Qualitative challenges "what is true?" * Single events are questionable because: * One account is governed by one context * Research by people about people * One account based on one researchers opinion
26
Aspects of Truth
* Reflexive - Researcher is central so they must reflect on themselves and the process * Fidelity - Be committed to presenting a true representation of the study * Created from agreed upon meanings as people talk * Shared meanings become codified for medicine, law, education etc * Recognised as normal and natural and central to arguements
27
Process
* Meaning is negotiable - can change over time * Need to understand ways meaning can change over time * Continually revisit data to clarify and confirm understanding and reveal nuances
28
Cycles of Research
* Cyclical & Non-Linear process * Often go back to seek new evidence that might modify existing theory * Generate new theory and repeat
29
Emergent Design
* Nothing is assumed - even theories, and hypotheses can change context * Theory emerges as we investigate * Data collection is relativeley unstructured
30
Neumann 1994 - Qualitative/Quantitative Divide
Allegedly separate and internal coherent approaches to research and theory * These methods can be characterised below;
31
Critiquing Definitions
* Commonality of Definitions * need to counterpose methods that reflect quantification
32
Commonality of Definitions
Examine & Compare qualitative methods against quantitative methods
33
Negative Definitions
* Inevitably begin by stating what qualitative methods are not * Need to understand both quantitative an qualitative * Both methods arose as criticism of the other * Responses address problems of both methodologies
34
Critiquing Definitions
* Commonality of definitions - Examine and Compare both methods * Qualitative - emerge recently as an alternative to mainstream * Difficult to define and measure separate from Quantification
35
Development of Qualitative Research
* Psychology is the science of the mind * Research follows the hypothetic-deductive model (Scientific Method) * Seeks to discover relationships with cause and effect * Empirical testing: if correct it is true, if incorrect then it is rejected
36
Experimentation and Qualitative Research
* Theories are adjusted to accommodate new facts * Eventually, false theories are rejected * Truth stands as false theories disappear * Other sciences are the same
37
Criticisms of the Scientific Method
* The Method is considered superior because it is objective and observable * Problems such as ecological validity, ethics, volunteer characteristics, etc * Parker 1994 - 3 Methodological Horrors
38
THE 3 METHODOLOGICAL HORRORS
1. Indexicality 2. Inconcludability 3. Reflexivity
39
Indexicality
* Explanations are always tied to situations and change with time and context * Problems of: * Reliability, validity , generalisation * Notions of replication
40
Inconcludability
* An account is always incomplete * Theories always supplemented and evolves this way * Problems of theory building, definitiveness and deductive closure
41
Reflexivity
* How we characterise ideas changes how it works for us * This changes our perception, which changes characterisation etc * Instability of social and psychological reality are obstacles to objectivity
42
Stagnating Theory Development
* Scientific Method doesn't leave space for theory development * Emphasis on testing to replicate means new theories are unlikely to be generated * Scientists unlikely to reject theories based on evidence * Kuhn 1962 said When evidence fails a theory, scientists blame flaws in the experiment not flaws in the theory
43
The Kuhn Cycle - Theory Development
* Science does not progress in a piecemeal manner * Takes leaps in scientific revolutions that lead to paradigm shifts * Qualitative methods contribute to new theory development * Particularly in grounded theories with no priori hypothesis
44
3 Horrors - Bridging the Gap
* Revolve around issues of context, meaning, interpretation * The ***Gap*** between perception of objects and their representations * This gap not acknowledged by science - Parker 1992 * Quantitative research works against the gap; Qualitative works with it * Qualitative deals with horrors and has processes that acknowledge the gap and attempts to bridge it. *
45
Fighting the Horrors - Indexicality
* Admit work is never perfectly replicable * Include accounts of changes over time * Aim to describe a specific context instead of formulating rules (Idiographic)
46
Fighting the Horrors - Inconcludability
* Aims to tell a plausible story not a complete one * Welcomes change and openness * Welcomes opportunity to supplement accounts * Results are always provisional
47
Fighting the Horrors - Reflexivity
* Regards subjectivity as a resource not a problem * Researcher can't be neutral so they can interact by knowing themselves * By looking at the role of Researcher, plausible rounded accounts can be compiled
48
Fighting the Horrors - Crisis in the 60's + 70's
An expression of the awareness that it is impossible to deal with interpretation by suppressing it.
49
POEM Paradigm
**P -** Purpose **O -** Ontology **E -** Epistemology **M -** Methodology
50
POEM - Purpose
Why is research conducted
51
POEM - Ontology
* What is the nature of reality * What can be known about it.
52
POEM - Epistemology
* The relationship between the Knower and what can be known * What can we know about the world and how do we know it
53
POEM - Methodology
How is the research carried out and investigated
54
Research Paradigms
* * Background knowledge tells us what we think exists * How do you understand it? - Most concretely * How do you think it should be studied Systems of interrelated ways of thinking that define four dimensions: 1. Purpose 2. Ontology 3. Epistemology 4. Methodology
55
POEM Paradigm
* Positivist * Interpretive * Constructionist
56
Anti-Positivist Paradigm
* Developed into several paradigms - interpretivism, constructionism, critical * Anti-Positivist common themes: * Too much information lost in quantification * Observation influenced by prior knowledge and opinion * Different theories explain same data just as well * Research is affected by other researchers purpose
57
Choosing Sides - Qual or Quant
* No one paradigm is best - both are valid * Depends on what you are trying to do * Qual can be seen as a voice of the investigation * Quant describes the scope and extent of an experience
58
Comparative Shoppers
Fitting the methodology to the question being asked and they type of data needed to answer it.
59
Understanding Paradigms - Top Line
**Purpose** - Research Question **Ontology -** Nature of reality **Epistemology -** Role of the Researcher **Methodology -** How research is conducted
60
Understanding Paradigms - 4 Paradigms
* Positivist * Experiential Interpretivist * Interpretivist * Constructionist
61
Understanding Paradigms - Positivist
* **P -** Determine differences and establish differences between groups * **O -** Objective Truth, Naïve Realism, Materialism * **E -** Neutral/detached observer, Empiricism * **M -** Quantitative Method
62
Understanding Paradigms - Experiential Interpretivist
* **P -** Exploring experience meaning, Assumes truth can be accessed through language * **O -** Experiential Realist, Critical Realist * **E -** Empathic Realist * **M -** Some Thematic Analysis, Glaserian Grounded Theory
63
Understanding Paradigms - Interpretivist
* **P -** Exploring meanings of stories, assumes truth cannot be accessed through language * **O -** Critical realist, Pragmatic relativist * **E -** Contextualist * **M -** Straussian Grounded Theory, IPA or Narrative Analysis
64
Understanding Paradigms - Constructionist
* **P -** Examine the construction of meaning * **O -** Discursively Constructed through social norms/relativist * **E -** Critical/Social constructionist * **M -** Discourse Analysis or Foucauldian Discourse Analysis
65
Positivism/Neo-Postivism
* Coined by Auguste Comte * Study social science by using the same methods as natural science: * e.g. Empiricism, Colleting data through observation * Became neo-positivism when observation became an impediment to studying the mind * Admitted that mental states can be ***inferred*** rather than observed directly * Epistemology Framework and Ontology - Realism (naive realism, materialism)
66
Interpretivist
* Cognitivism relies on deducing mental states * Observable behaviour can infer mental states
67
Social Constructionist
* Emerged in the 70's in response to criticisms of scientific method * Method might be inappropriate to understanding human behaviour * Relativist Ontology - rejection of single reality * Truth is relative * Socially constructed through language * Pursuit of psychology should study langauge
68
Pragmatist
* Research uses philosophy and methodical approach * This works best for problems being investigated * Does it work? Then it's probably right * Associated with mixed methods research
69
Psychology Research - 5 Tasks
1. Examine 2. Discover 3. Determine 4. Explore 5. Examine again
70
Language in Research
We examine ideas and how they are represented in language and their perspectives
71
2 Different Objectives in Research
1. Nomothetic Research 2. Ideographic Research
72
Nomothetic Resarch
* Dictates future outcomes * Needs large Sample sizes * Quantitative * Very General
73
Ideographic Research
* Deep and detailed understandings of events * Thick descriptive language * Small sample sizes * More in depth but not general
74
Qualitiative Research is . . .
* Focused on making sense of the human experience * Within context and not future prediction * Reflexive - Encourages study of subjective and objective experiences * Insists on linguistic, historical and social context to observe human behaviour
75
Types of Qualitative Research Approaches
There are many and numerous styles but they all have these characteristics: * Description * Context * Meaning * Interpretation * Truth * Process
76
Context of Research
* occurs in everyday contexts * Accounts for wider social political and cultural context * Is immersive to understand at many different levels * Power relations have real effects
77
Context Shapes . .
* Subject of investigation * Standpoint of the investigators * How we approach research * Objects take on meaning in relation to the context in which we use them
78
Interpretation
* How I see the world * Quant screens out interpretation - tries to be objective * Qual believes this is impossible * The world is always interpreted * Not what we do but who we are
79
Gap Between Interpretation and Understanding
* Bridges reality with what we know * Notice there is a gap between the things we know and the account of what they are
80
Surplus of Meaning
* Meaning and interpretation are unstable * changes in as our understanding of the world changes * There is always more to add and different ideas to develop
81
Truth
* Notion of truth raises doubts by the Qualitative Method * Any single explanation of a phenomenon is questionable because it is incomplete * There is only one context or history * Done buy people about people * Don't just study one phenomenon, Also motivations intentions and beleifs
82
Reflexive Practice
* Researcher must: * Reflect on themselves and the process * Be committed to a TRUE representation of the study
83
Fidelity in Research
Researcher must: * Be committed to preset a true representation of the study * Remain objective about the outcome and not manipulate the result
84
Truth
* Created within social interaction * Created by agreed upon meanings as we talk about experiences * Shared meanings become normalised in law, medicine etc
85
Meaning is negotiable
* Can change and evolve over time * We examine the process of meaning change by revisit ideas and data * Cyclical Process/Non-Linear process often looking back to old data, modifying theories and repeat * Theory is expected to emerge as investigation proceeds
86
Emergent Design
Theories emerge from investigation Few/No prior hypotheses Data Collection is relatively unstructured
87
Positivist Paradigm
* Ontology * Stable, external reality * Law-like * Epistemology * Objective * Detached observer * Methodology * Experimental * Quantitative * Hypothesis
88
Interpretive Paradigm
* Ontology * Internal reality of subjective experience * Epistemology * Empathetic * Observer intersubjectivity * Methodology * Interactional * Interpretation * qualitative
89
Constructionist Paradigm
* Ontology * Socially constructed reality * Discourse * Epistemology * Suspicious * Political * Observer constructing versions * Methodology * Deconstruction * textual analysis * Discursive psychology
90
Social Constructionist View
* Truth is constructed through language * Study of psychology should include the study of **Language**